saucony excursion or peregrine

Shoes Fulcrum

“As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.” I may receive a small commission (at no cost to you) if you purchase something through the links provided on this website. Read more …

Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine: Best Trail Running Shoe?

Are you a passionate trail runner seeking the perfect footwear for your off-road adventures?

Are you all set to begin a thrilling journey across challenging landscapes, magnificent forests, and awe-inspiring scenery?

Then, look no further, as today I will dive into the comparison between two top-notch trail running shoes : the Saucony Excursion and the Peregrine . Because, trail running has always been my passion, and I’ve had the opportunity to test various shoes on different terrains.

I understand the importance of finding a reliable companion that offers a perfect blend of performance, comfort, and durability . When it comes to running on trails, having the appropriate footwear can have a significant impact.

 The right pair will keep your feet protected, provide optimal traction, and enhance your overall running experience. With multiple options available in the market, it’s essential to understand the features that set two popular models the Saucony Excursion and the Peregrine apart.

Moreover, trail running requires reliable footwear that can withstand rugged terrains and provide you with the necessary comfort and support .  

In this article, I will examine the unique features of both shoes , evaluate how they perform when compared, and offer you useful information to help you make a knowledgeable decision.

So, let’s embark on this journey together and discover which shoe is the ultimate trail running companion for you.

Before we began let’s know a little bit about trail running shoes.

Al so, Check Out : Saucony Wide VS Regular: Choose The Right Fit For Your Feet

Table of Contents

What Are Trail Running Shoes?

Unlike traditional road running shoes , trail running shoes are specifically made to withstand the harsh conditions encountered on various terrains.

The three crucial elements that make these shoes a revolutionary choice for trail runners are

1) Traction,

2) Durability and

3) Protection.

1) Traction

Trail running shoes are engineered with robust outsoles that offer superior grip on a variety of surfaces.

The outsole features aggressive lugs or multidirectional treads, strategically placed to provide maximum traction on loose gravel, muddy paths, slippery rocks, and uneven terrain.

 This enhanced grip allows you to maintain stability and control , even when navigating steep ascents, descents, or unpredictable obstacles.

With every step, you’ll feel confident knowing that your shoes will keep you firmly grounded, enabling you to tackle any trail with ease.

2) Durability 

Trail running shoes are designed to endure the challenges of running on non-paved terrains.

The upper portion of the shoe is constructed using durable materials such as reinforced mesh, synthetic overlays, or even protective toe caps .

These elements offer resistance against abrasion from rocks, branches, and other debris you may encounter on the trail. 

Additionally, the midsole of trail running shoes is often fortified with supportive cushioning and resilient materials, ensuring long-lasting comfort and preventing premature wear and tear.

By investing in a pair of durable trail running shoes , you can confidently take on countless miles of rugged terrain without worrying about the shoes giving out.

3) Protection

One of the most important elements of trail running shoes is their capacity to safeguard your feet from possible dangers.

The rugged outsole not only provides traction but also acts as a barrier between your feet and sharp rocks or roots , preventing injuries from punctures or bruising. 

Additionally, many trail running shoes incorporate features like rock plates or shanks in the midsole , offering extra protection against stone bruises or uneven terrain.

The upper of the shoe often includes a gusseted tongue to keep debris out, minimizing discomfort and the risk of blisters.

With every stride, you’ll feel the confidence that comes with knowing your shoes are shielding you from potential harm , allowing you to focus on the exhilarating experience of the trail.

Also, Check Out : Hoka Anacapa VS Kaha: Which Trail Running Shoe Should You Choose?

Major Differences: Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine

To make your decision-making process more enjoyable and interactive, I have created an exciting comparison table that highlights the key differences between Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine.

Fit And Comfort : Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine

When it comes to trail running, having a shoe that offers the perfect fit and exceptional comfort is paramount .

The Saucony Excursion and Peregrine are two popular options that trail runners often consider.

Let’s dive in and find out which shoe reigns supreme in the battle of the perfect fit.

Anatomical Design And Foot-Hugging Capabilities

The Saucony Excursion and Peregrine both excel in providing a supportive and anatomically designed fit. 

Saucony Excursion

The Excursion features a well-crafted upper that contours to the shape of the foot, offering a snug and secure fit.

Its anatomical design allows for natural foot movement while providing stability and support. 

The Excursion’s foot-hugging capabilities ensure that your foot stays in place during challenging trail runs, reducing the risk of discomfort and potential injuries.

Saucony Peregrine

Similarly, the Peregrine incorporates an anatomical design that embraces the contours of the foot.

It boasts a seamless upper construction that minimizes friction and hot spots, providing a comfortable and irritation-free experience. 

The Peregrine’s foot-hugging capabilities create a sense of connection between your foot and the shoe , enhancing overall stability and control on various terrains.

Available Width Options And Lace-Up Systems

Selecting the appropriate width for your foot can have a considerable impact on how well your shoes fit and how comfortable they feel. 

The Saucony Excursion offers various width options , catering to different foot shapes and sizes. 

Additionally, the Excursion incorporates a traditional lace-up system that allows for personalized adjustments, enabling you to fine-tune the fit to your liking.

On the other hand, the Peregrine also offers multiple width options, ensuring that runners can find the ideal fit.

Moreover, it features a dynamic fit system t hat adapts to the movement of your foot, providing a customized and secure fit. 

The Peregrine’s dynamic fit system dynamically adjusts to changes in foot volume and shape during a run , promoting a more comfortable and supportive fit throughout your trail running adventures.

Dynamic Fit System And Adaptive Features

The dynamic fit system in the Peregrine sets it apart from the Saucony Excursion.

This innovative feature enables the shoe to adapt to the natural movement of your foot, providing a dynamic and responsive fit. 

As I discussed above, The Peregrine’s dynamic fit system ensures that the shoe moves with your foot, accommodating changes in volume and shape as you tackle various terrains. This adaptability enhances overall comfort and reduces the risk of blisters and discomfort during longer runs.

While the Excursion lacks a specific dynamic fit system, it may not have the same adaptive features as the Peregrine, but the Excursion still delivers a reliable and comfortable fit for trail runners.

Sizing Options And Customizable Lacing Systems

Sizing options.

Both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine offer a range of sizing options to accommodate different foot sizes. This ensures that you can find the perfect fit, regardless of your foot dimensions. 

• Excursion’s sizing options allow for precise fitting,  
• while Peregrine’s sizing options cater to a wide range of foot shapes and sizes , ensuring that every runner can find their ideal fit.

Customizable Lacing Systems

In terms of lacing systems, the Excursion incorporates a traditional lace-up system, allowing for personalized adjustments and a secure fit.

The adjustable lacing system allows you to personalize the tightness according to your preferences, guaranteeing the utmost comfort and support throughout your off-road runs.

Similarly, Peregrine offers customizable lacing systems, allowing you to achieve a personalized fit.

Whether you prefer a snug fit for technical terrains or a more relaxed fit for longer distances, Peregrine’s customizable lacing system allows for adjustments to accommodate your specific preferences.

Important Point

Both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine excel in providing a comfortable and supportive fit for trail runners. 

• The Excursion’s anatomical design , foot-hugging capabilities, available width options, and customizable lacing system ensure a secure and stable fit, promoting confidence on the trails. 
• On the other hand, Peregrine’s dynamic fit system , adaptive features, sizing options, and customizable lacing system offer a more personalized and adaptable fit.

Also, Check Out : Hoka Kawana VS Clifton: Which Running Shoe Is Best For You?

Performance On Different Terrains : Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine

When it comes to trail running, having a shoe that performs well on diverse terrains is essential for a confident and enjoyable running experience.  

Keep on reading to find out how both Saucony shoes perform on different surfaces.

Gravel Paths : Finding Stability And Traction

When running on gravel paths, stability, and traction are paramount. 

The Saucony Excursion is designed to provide excellent stability on uneven surfaces.

Its durable outsole with multidirectional lugs offers reliable traction, ensuring a confident stride on gravel paths.

The Excursion’s grippy rubber compound helps to maintain traction, allowing you to navigate these terrains with ease.

Similarly, the Peregrine boasts impressive performance on gravel paths.

Its aggressive outsole pattern, featuring multidirectional lugs, provides exceptional traction, giving you the confidence to take on various gravel terrains.

The Peregrine’s outsole is designed to grip the ground securely, ensuring stability and reducing the risk of slipping or sliding on gravel surfaces.

Muddy Trails : Conquering The Slippery Challenge

When faced with muddy trails, having a shoe that can handle slippery conditions is crucial.  

The Saucony Excursion features a water-resistant upper that helps to keep your feet dry in muddy environments.

Additionally, the shoe’s drainage capabilities allow water and mud to escape , preventing excessive weight gain and maintaining a comfortable running experience.

The Peregrine takes muddy trails in stride with its impressive waterproofing capabilities .

Its waterproof upper acts as a shield , keeping water and mud at bay and ensuring dry and comfortable feet even in wet conditions.

The Peregrine’s breathability also plays a vital role, allowing moisture to escape , and preventing a clammy and uncomfortable feel during your muddy trail runs.

Rocky Surfaces : Protecting Feet From Impact

Running on rocky surfaces requires a shoe that provides ample protection against impact. 

The Saucony Excursion is equipped with features that cushion your feet and absorb shock .

Its supportive midsole and cushioning technology help to mitigate the impact of rocky terrain, reducing discomfort and potential injuries.

Similarly, the Peregrine offers reliable protection on rocky surfaces.

Its responsive cushioning system delivers a comfortable and cushioned ride, minimizing the impact of uneven and rocky terrains.

The Peregrine’s midsole provides adequate support, ensuring that your feet remain comfortable and protected throughout your runs on rocky surfaces.

Loose Soil : Maintaining Stability And Traction

Loose soil can present a challenge due to its unpredictable and shifting nature. 

The Saucony Excursion performs admirably on loose soil, providing stability and traction .

The shoe’s lugged outsole effectively grips loose soil, allowing you to maintain control and stability even in challenging conditions.

The Excursion’s stability features, such as its supportive midsole and secure fit, further enhance its performance on loose soil.

The Peregrine is also well-suited for running on loose soil.

Its outsole design, featuring multidirectional lugs, excels at gripping loose soil, providing the traction needed for confident running.

The shoe’s stability features, including its dynamic fit system and secure upper construction , contribute to a stable and comfortable experience on loose soil.

Steep Slopes : Conquering Uphill And Downhill Challenges

Running on steep slopes demands a shoe that offers reliable grip and stability. 

The Saucony Excursion rises to the occasion, providing a secure foothold on steep slopes.

Its outsole design, featuring multidirectional lugs and a durable rubber compound, ensures excellent traction, allowing you to navigate uphill and downhill sections with confidence.

The Peregrine also excels on steep slopes, thanks to its aggressive outsole pattern and multidirectional lugs.

These features work in harmony to deliver exceptional grip, allowing you to tackle uphill and downhill challenges with ease .

The shoe’s secure fit and stability features further enhance your control and stability on steep slopes.

Technical Trails : Agility And Responsiveness

Technical trails require a shoe that offers agility and responsiveness to navigate tricky obstacles. 

The Saucony Excursion’s lightweight design and responsive midsole make it a capable companion on technical trails.

Its low-profile construction allows for quick and nimble movements, while its cushioning provides a comfortable and responsive feel on uneven terrain.

The Peregrine shines on technical trails, offering agility and responsiveness.

Its lightweight and flexible construction allows for swift and precise movements, enabling you to navigate technical sections with confidence.

The Peregrine’s responsive cushioning and secure fit contribute to a heightened level of control and agility on challenging trail obstacles.

From the above discussion, both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine demonstrate impressive performance on a variety of terrains.  

• The Excursion excels on gravel paths, muddy trails, and rocky surfaces, offering stability, water resistance, and drainage capabilities. 
• On the other hand, the Peregrine performs exceptionally well on loose soil, steep slopes, and technical trails, showcasing its traction, waterproofing, and breathability features. 

I would advise Consider your specific needs and the terrain you plan to tackle when choosing between these two outstanding trail running shoes.

Also, Check Out : Hoka Gaviota VS Clifton: Which Is Best For Road Running?

Support And Stability : Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine

In this comparison, I will explore the support and stability features of each shoe, including arch support, impact absorption, reinforced heel and ankle support for the Excursion ,

midfoot and torsional support, toe protection, and stability features for the Peregrine.  

Let’s dive into the details and find out which shoe offers the ideal support and stability for your trail running adventures.

Arch Support And Impact Absorption

The Saucony Excursion prioritizes arch support and impact absorpti on to ensure a comfortable and stable running experience.

Its supportive midsole is designed to pr ovide excellent arch support, cradling your foot and reducing stress on the arches.

This feature is particularly beneficial for runners with high arches or those who require additional support during their runs. 

The Excursion’s midsole also incorporates cushioning technology that effectively absorbs impact, reducing the strain on your joints and providing a smoother ride on uneven terrains.

Similarly, the Peregrine offers reliable support and impact absorption through its midfoot and torsional support features .

The s hoe’s midfoot shank provides stability and prevents excessive twisting of the foot, ensuring a secure and supported stride. 

Additionally, the Peregrine’s midsole cushioning delivers impact absorption, reducing the strain on your feet and legs during intense trail runs . The combination of midfoot support and impact absorption enhances the overall stability and comfort of the Peregrine.

Reinforced Heel And Ankle Support

The Saucony Excursion goes the extra mile in providing reinforced heel and ankle suppor t. The shoe features a supportive heel counter that helps stabilize the rearfoot, preventing excessive movement and promoting proper alignment. 

This reinforced support is particularly beneficial when running on uneven and challenging terrains, offering a secure and locked-in feel for your foot.

Additionally, the Excursion’s padded collar and tongue provide cushioning and support around the ankle, further enhancing stability and reducing the risk of discomfort or injury.

On the other hand, the Peregrine focuses on stability through toe protection and additional stability features.

The shoe’s reinforced toe bumper safeguards your toes from potential impacts and obstacles on the trails, providing an added layer of protection. 

Furthermore, the Peregrine incorporates stability features throughout its design, such as a secure lacing system and a well-structured uppe r, ensuring a supportive fit that minimizes foot movement and enhances stability.

• The Excursion excels in arch support and impact absorption, ensuring a comfortable and stable ride. Its reinforced heel and ankle support add an extra layer of security, promoting proper alignment and reducing the risk of discomfort or injury. 
• On the other hand, the Peregrine prioritizes midfoot and torsional support, along with the protection and stability features, providing stability and protection on challenging terrains.

Also, Check Out : NoBull Vs Nano Shoes | Which Is The Ultimate Fitness Shoe?

Durability And Longevity : Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine

Let’s see how both shoes perform in this category.

Upper Materials: Building For Toughness

The upper materials used in a trail running shoe play a crucial role in determining its durability and longevity . 

The Saucony Excursion is constructed with high-quality materials designed to withstand the elements.

Its upper is crafted from durable synthetic overlays and breathable mesh , providing a balance between protection and ventilation.

These materials are built to withstand abrasion and resist tearing, ensuring long-lasting performance on the trails.

Similarly, the Peregrine boasts durable construction with a focus on trail endurance.

It’s upper utilizes rugged synthetic overlays and mesh , providing a combination of durability and breathability.

These materials are engineered to resist wear and tear , allowing the shoe to withstand the demands of challenging terrains over an extended period.

Overall Construction : Building For The Long Haul

In addition to specific components, the overall construction of a trail running shoe contributes to its durability and longevity. 

The S aucony Excursion is built with attention to detail, focusing on reinforcing areas that endure the most stress.

The shoe features sturdy stitching, reinforced overlays, and a well-constructed upper , ensuring long-lasting performance even in the most challenging trail conditions.

The Excursion’s durability is further enhanced by its solid midsole and well-cushioned insole , which maintain their supportive properties over time.

Similarly, the Peregrine is crafted with durability in mind.

Its construction incorporates sturdy stitching and reinforced overlays in areas prone to wear, such as the toe box and heel counter .

These reinforcements provide added protection and longevity to the shoe.

The Peregrine’s overall structure is designed to withstand the demands of trail running, allowing it to endure over extended periods while maintaining its performance.

Important Point  

• The Excursion’s synthetic overlays, breathable mesh, and durable outsole contribute to its longevity, ensuring it can withstand the demands of trail running. 
• The Peregrine’s rugged upper materials , durable outsole, and reinforced construction also offer excellent durability and longevity on the trails.

Breathability And Moisture-Wicking Properties : Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine

Both shoes have breathability and moisture-wicking properties.  

Upper Materials And Ventilation

The Saucony Excursion incorporates breathable upper materials to enhance airflow and prevent heat buildup.

Its combination of synthetic overlays and breathable mesh allows air to circulate within the shoe , promoting ventilation and preventing your feet from feeling overly hot and sweaty. 

The mesh panels in the Excursion’s upper actively wick away moisture, keeping your feet cool and dry even during intense trail runs.

This breathability feature is especially beneficial for longer runs and hot weather conditions , ensuring a comfortable running experience.

Similarly, the Peregrine is equipped with a breathable upper designed to enhance airflow and maintain a cool environment for your feet.

The shoe’s combination of synthetic overlays and mesh materials allows air to flow through, preventing heat from getting trapped inside the shoe.

 The Peregrine’s upper also features strategically placed ventilation holes or panels that further enhance breathability and facilitate moisture evaporation.

This ventilation system helps keep your feet dry and comfortable, even during challenging trail runs.

Moisture-Wicking Technology

The Saucony Excursion incorporates moisture-wicking technology to actively manage sweat and keep your feet dry throughout your run.

The inside of the shoe is created to remove moisture from your skin , helping it to absorb the sweat and stop it from gathering inside the shoe .

This special feature helps keep your feet drier and more comfortable, and it lowers the chances of getting painful spots, feeling uncomfortable, and having bad smells caused by too much sweat .

The Peregrine also features effective moisture-wicking properties that actively combat sweat and moisture buildup.

The interior of the shoe is designed to absorb perspiration from your feet, transferring it to the outer sections of the shoe where it can dry up.

This helps keep your feet feeling fresh and dry. By wicking away sweat, the Peregrine keeps your feet dry and comfortable, minimizing the risk of discomfort and blisters.

Important Point 

• The Excursion’s breathable upper materials and moisture-wicking technology actively work together to provide ventilation and prevent sweat buildup. 
• The Peregrine’s well-ventilated design and moisture-wicking features also contribute to a dry and comfortable running experience.

Weight : Uncovering The Difference In Lightness And Agility

The weight of your footwear plays a vital role in trail running, as it has a significant impact on your performance and overall satisfaction while engaging in the activity.

Lighter shoes offer enhanced agility and a more effortless stride, allowing you to navigate the trails with greater ease.

In this comparison, I will explore the weight of the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine, highlighting their differences and how they may affect your trail running endeavors.

Saucony Excursion : Striking the Balance

The Saucony Excursion is designed to strike a balance between durability and weight .

Although it may not be the most lightweight trail running shoe available, it provides a manageable weight that ensures a pleasant and agile running experience. 

On average, the Saucony Excursion weighs around 10.5 ounces (298 grams), depending on the shoe size and specific model. This weight provides a stable and supportive platform without sacrificing too much in terms of agility.

The Excursion’s weight is attributed to its construction and cushioning.

The shoe features a robust outsole and midsole that provide excellent durability and impact protection. The added cushioning offers a comfortable underfoot feel, making it suitable for longer runs and more challenging terrains.

While the Saucony Excursion is not the lightest option, it strikes a balance between durability, cushioning, and weight to ensure a reliable and comfortable trail running experience.

Peregrine : Embracing Lightweight Agility

In contrast to the Excursion, the Peregrine embraces a lighter weight to enhance agility and speed on the trails.

On average, the Peregrine weighs between 9.0 and 10.3 ounces (255 to 292 grams). The weight may vary based on the shoe size and particular model of the Peregrine. 

The Peregrine achieves its lightweight design through careful material selection and a focus on streamlined construction .

The shoe’s upper utilizes lightweight materials that provide a balance between durability and weight reduction. 

The midsole is designed to offer responsive cushioning without excessive bulk , contributing to the overall lightness of the shoe.

In my experience, The Peregrine is a good option for runners who want a lighter shoe, as it allows for a more nimble and speedy experience when running on trails.

Choosing The Right Weight For Your Needs

•  If you prioritize durability and a more cushioned feel, the slightly heavier weight of the Saucony Excursion may be a suitable choice. 
• Alternatively, if you appreciate flexibility, quickness, and a sleeker sensation, the reduced weight of the Peregrine might be more attractive. 

However, it’s essential to remember that weight alone should not be the only decisive element when selecting a trail running shoe. Other aspects such as fit, comfort, terrain-specific requirements, and personal running goals should also be taken into consideration.

Common Misconceptions : Debunking Myths About Trail Running Shoes

When it comes to shoes specifically designed for running on trails, many people have misconceptions that can often cause confusion and spread incorrect information. 

In this section, I will address and debunk some common myths associated with trail running shoes, specifically focusing on the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine models . 

Myth 1 : Trail Running Shoes Are Just Like Regular Running Shoes

One popular misunderstanding is that trail running shoes are identical to ordinary running shoes. While both types of shoes are designed for running, trail running shoes are specifically engineered to withstand the challenges of off-road terrains.  

The Saucony Excursion and Peregrine are prime examples of trail running shoes that feature specialized components and design elements to provide the necessary traction, stability, and protection required on the trails.

They incorporate durable outsoles with aggressive tread patterns , protective toe caps, and rugged upper materials to ensure optimal performance on uneven surfaces.

Myth 2 : Trail Running Shoes Are Heavy And Bulky

Another misconception is that trail running shoes are heavy and bulky, which can deter runners looking for a lightweight and agile experience. However, modern trail running shoes, including the Excursion and Peregrine, are designed with a focus on lightweight construction without compromising durability and support. 

These shoes utilize innovative materials and design techniques to reduce weight while maintaining essential features such as impact absorption, stability, and protection.

The Saucony Excursion and Peregrine strike a balance between durability and weight, providing a comfortable and responsive running experience without unnecessary bulk.

Myth 3 : Cushioning Is Not Important In Trail Running Shoes

Some people believe that cushioning is not essential in trail running shoes because the uneven terrain provides enough natural cushioning.

However, this is a misconception that can lead to discomfort and potential injuries. Cushioning plays a crucial role in absorbing impact forces, reducing strain on joints, and enhancing overall comfort during trail runs . 

Both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine feature cushioned midsoles that provide excellent shock absorption, helping to alleviate fatigue and protect your feet on longer runs or challenging surfaces.

The level of cushioning can vary between models , allowing runners to choose the option that suits their preferences and needs.

Myth 4 : All Trail Running Shoes Offer The Same Level Of Traction

Traction is a vital aspect of trail running shoes, but not all shoes provide the same level of grip and traction on different terrains. It is a misconception to assume that all trail running shoes, including the Excursion and Peregrine, offer identical traction capabilities.

While both models are designed for off-road running, they have different outsole patterns and rubber compounds optimized for specific trail conditions. 

The Saucony Excursion and Peregrine incorporate aggressive and multidirectional tread patterns, along with durable rubber compounds, to deliver superior traction on various surfaces such as gravel, mud, and rocks.

The specific design elements of the outsole contribute to the shoes’ ability to grip and navigate different terrains effectively.

Myth 5 : All Trail Running Shoes Are Waterproof

It is important to clarify that not all trail running shoes, including the Excursion and Peregrine, are fully waterproof.

While these shoes might provide a certain degree of protection against water, they aren’t specifically built to ensure your feet stay entirely dry when it’s wet outside.

Water resistance varies depending on the materials used in the upper construction and the presence of additional waterproofing technologies. 

The Saucony Excursion and Peregrine prioritize breathability and moisture management to ensure your feet stay comfortable and dry by allowing sweat and moisture to escape.

However, if you frequently encounter wet conditions or require full waterproofing, I would advise you to consider additional waterproof accessories or alternative shoe options.

Pros And Cons : Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine

Both shoes have the following Pros and Cons.

Conclusion  

After a detailed discussion on Saucony Excursion VS Peregrine , I hope you will have a clear picture of both trail running shoes. Moreover, both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine offer remarkable features and performance for trail running enthusiasts. 

The Excursion excels in durability, support, and impact absorption, making it a reliable companion on rugged terrains. On the other hand, the Peregrine shines with its lightweight and agile design, excellent traction, and customizable fit . 

While the Excursion may be slightly heavier, the Peregrine may lack cushioning and durability. Ultimately, the choice between these two shoes depends on your own preferences, terrain conditions, and specific running needs. 

Whichever shoe you select, both the Excursion and Peregrine are capable companions that will elevate your trail running experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are the saucony excursion and peregrine suitable for beginners in trail running .

Yes, both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine are suitable for beginners. They offer the necessary support, traction, and durability required for trail running, helping beginners navigate various terrains with confidence.

Do the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine come in different width options?

Yes, both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine offer multiple width options to accommodate different foot shapes and sizes. This allows for a more comfortable and customized fit.

Are the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine suitable for wet or rainy conditions?

While the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine offer some level of water resistance, they are not fully waterproof. They prioritize breathability and moisture-wicking properties to keep your feet dry and comfortable, but additional waterproofing measures may be required for prolonged exposure to wet conditions.

Can I use orthotic inserts with the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine?

Yes, both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine are generally compatible with orthotic inserts. The removable insoles allow for customization and the use of orthotics if needed, enhancing comfort and support for those with specific foot conditions.

How do I clean and maintain the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine?

Typically, gently brushing off dirt and debris and allowing them to air dry is sufficient. Avoid machine washing and excessive exposure to direct sunlight or heat sources to prolong the lifespan of the shoes.

Can I use the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine for road running?

While the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine are primarily designed for trail running, they can be used for occasional road running. However, their outsole design and traction may not provide the same level of performance and durability on paved surfaces compared to specialized road running shoes.

Are the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine true to size?

Generally, the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine are true to size. However, it is recommended to refer to the manufacturer’s size chart and consider individual foot characteristics to ensure the best fit. Trying them on or consulting with a footwear specialist can also help determine the ideal size for you.

Can I use the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine for long-distance trail running?

Yes, both the Saucony Excursion and Peregrine are suitable for long-distance trail running. Their cushioning, support, and durability make them capable of providing comfort and protection during extended runs on challenging terrains.

About Author :

Hammad Qadir is a passionate fashion blogger with a passion for shoes, spanning over seven years. As the driving force behind “ShoesFulcrum.com” he offers unparalleled insights into iconic brands like Crocs, Hey Dude, and Birkenstock. With a collection of a hundred pairs, his expertise extends to industry giants like Nike and Adidas. Through insightful reviews and recommendations, Hammad guides readers to their perfect pair. Hammad’s knack for differentiating between brands and guiding readers makes him a trusted authority. Active on Quora, Reddit, Medium, LinkedIn, and Pinterest, he fosters engagement and shares exclusive content. Read more. ..

Related Posts

Hey Dude VS Allbirds: Which Brand Is Better? (2023)

New Balance Vs ASICS: Which Brand Is Better? (2023)

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

6 Key Differences Between Saucony Excursion and Peregrine

If you are looking for some high-quality trail running shoes, Saucony has quite a few models to offer. Almost all of their shoes have been well-received in the past, but the two lines that gained the most popularity are the Saucony Excursion and Saucony Peregrine. 

The first one has a combination of Comfort, quality, and flexibility while the second one is built to stand the test of time. Having clear contrast in features, it’s hard to choose one between the two. That is why I am here to help you with common inquiries regarding them. 

Saucony Excursion vs Peregrine (Key Differences)

But first, let’s take a quick glance to see what both have to offer.

◈ Materials 

Saucony is well-known for its lightweight shoes. So materials for all of their shoes tend to be lighter but strong and sturdy at the same time. Excursion and Peregrine models are no different. 

The excursion models have knitted mesh upper on top. Besides that, all the models have synthetic overlays that help lock the feet in place. As for the outsole, they went with a regular rubber outsole for a lighter feel. The lugs on the outsoles however are made with carbon rubber for better strength and toughness.  

What I personally like about the Excursion models is their midsoles. The brand uses VERSARUN midsole which is an EVA-based cushioning. Plus they have the usual padded collar and tongue, and removable insoles.

Now let’s take a look at the second model which is the Saucony Peregrine. This one has the same mesh upper as the excursion model. But here, it is more padded with a rubberized overlay. 

PWRTRAC outsole is used for superior grip and stability. Additionally, the rubber contents used on this line are top-grade and extremely durable. They have also used PWRRUN midsole on some of the models from the peregrine line. 

I have also written an article on Saucony Regular vs Wide shoes .

As a former owner of a pair of Saucony Excursion TR14 and Saucony Peregrine 11, I would say Excursion had the upper hand in this department. 

The mesh upper on the Excursion models is breathable to some degrees and at the same time strong so your feet are gripped tightly but comfortably. 

The 6mm lugs on the outsole are naturally hard. Before I purchased them a lot of people claimed that the lungs were uncomfortable and dug into your feet. However, I have found them quite helpful for the grip on rocky and hilly areas so I guess it varies according to your preference. 

Now, I wouldn’t exactly call the Peregrine model uncomfortable. They are just a bit more rigid, stiffer, and heavier than the Excursion line. At the same time there are plenty of other elements of comfort you’ll find. They have better arch support, don’t wobble or slip on rough surfaces and the traction is to die for.

Unlike the Excursion line, peregrine models come with wide-toe boxes so there’s more room for your feet to breathe. 

You may also like my article on Saucony Kinvara 12 vs Kinvara 13 .

◈ Durability 

When you are buying a pair of trail-running shoes, you expect them to last for at least a good one or two years at best. And Saucony definitely passes the test of time. 

The brand defines the durability of its shoes as a measure of miles as in how many miles you can run in a pair of their shoes. They have stated that their shoes will last you at least a good 400 miles. So considering you are going 20 miles a week, a pair of Saucony will last you for about 5 months. This is pretty doable in my opinion since most running or trail shoes last about the same. 

However, it’s important to take in some factors as well such as the weather, the condition of the trail you’re running on, etc. I wore my Saucony Excursion pair for over a year and the Peregrine pair for almost 2 years. Since the trail I used to run is fairly well-groomed, the performance was satisfactory for me. But if you are planning on a rocky mountain trail in the summertime, the heated surface is going to wear it down in a matter of a few months. 

The mesh upper on both shoes is sturdy and holds up well. But the Peregrine pair clearly has superior durability. The padded upper plus the strong rock plate in these shoes can withstand anything on the trail.

Here is another article on the key differences between Saucony Jazz and Hornet shoes .

◈ Flexibility 

Saucony Excursion has the upper hand in this section too. They are more cushiony and softer feeling, unlike Peregrine shoes which are one of the sturdiest trail running shoes on the market. Additionally, excursion shoes come without any rock plate which makes these shoes more flexible and bendable at the cost of durability. 

On the other hand, all the Peregrine models come with a rock plate. Add that with a stiffly padded upper with a rubberized overlay and the flexibility goes out the window. Since they were made especially for rougher and harsher trails, they bend very little even when walking on rocks.

You can also go through my article on the differences between Brooks Cascadia and Saucony Peregrine .

Frequently Asked Question 

1. are peregrine shoes waterproof.

Not all but some of the models from the Peregrine line are waterproof such as the Peregrine 13 GTX.

2. Do Saucony peregrine shoes run true to size?

Ans: Yes, but they are very snug on the feet so if you have wider feet going up a size is better. 

Final Words

As you can already guess, there is no clear winner between the two shoes. Both have something unique to offer while having some shortcomings as well. So it depends on what features are more important to you and what you can compromise. I like peregrine for its durability and performance on rougher trails. But if you want more comfort and flexibility, definitely go for Excursion.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Trail Running |

The Saucony trail running shoe range explained

We break down and the explain saucony's comprehensive trail running shoe range..

Saucony's trail running shoe range is extensive and includes models for terrains of all types. Here, we're taking a look at that comprehensive Saucony range, and checking out the technologies behind them.

The Saucony brand has been around for over a century. And for a long time it's been one of the big names in running. Its range of trail running shoes builds on decades of experience, resulting in superb options for runners of all types and levels.

Saucony Peregrine 13, Peregrine 13 ST and Peregrine 13 GTX

Weight: 260g (men's)/ 230g (women's) Drop: 4mm Lug depth: 5mm (13 and GTX, 6.5mm ST) Support: Neutral

This shoe is named after the fastest animal on Earth for a reason. Lightweight and yet fantastically comfortable, the Saucony Peregrine 13 is for blistering speedy trail runs.

Shaving even more weight off the already lightweight Peregrine 12, the Peregrine 13 helps deliver more speed than ever before in the range. Weighing just 260g for men and 230g for women (across an average size curve), this model is one of the lightest shoes in the pack.

This updated version of the classic Peregrine trail shoe has a redesigned lug pattern with deep 5mm lugs. And the Peregrine 13 ST (soft terrain) shoe provides the most aggressive grip of all the Saucony trail shoes at 6.5mm. It also features an in-built gaiter for added protection against debris. In short, there should be no amount of rugged terrain you can’t tackle.

Saucony Peregrine 13

Terrain: A versatile shoe for lightweight speed and versatility on variety of terrain; from forest paths, to grass, to rocky trails.

Technology & key features:  PWRTRAC rubber outsole (grip), PWRRUN cushioning (midsole), a protective rock plate, and deep 5mm lugs for tackling mud.

Distance:  Short- to middle-distance runs.

Feel of the shoe:  A lightweight, nimble trail shoe with good grip and cushioning.

Saucony Peregrine 13 ST

Terrain: Designed specifically for providing the most grip in soft ground conditions.

Technology & key features:  PWRTRAC rubber outsole (grip), PWRRUN cushioning (midsole), a protective rock plate, and aggressive 6.5mm lugs for tackling mud.

Feel of the shoe:  Nimble and lightweight with an aggressive outsole.

Saucony Peregrine 13 GTX

Terrain: For the same terrain as the 13 but keeps feet dry in wet conditions.

Technology & key features:  PWRTRAC rubber outsole (grip), PWRRUN cushioning (midsole), a protective rock plate, deep 5mm lugs for tackling mud, and invisible fit GORE-TEX upper material to keep your feet dry.

Feel of the shoe:  Nimble and lightweight. The GORE-TEX upper doesn’t change the fit - choose your usual size.

Shop all Saucony Peregrine 13 trail shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Endorphin Trail and Endorphin Trail Mid

Weight: 275g (men's)/ 235g (women's) Drop: 4mm Lug depth: 4.5mm Support: Neutral

The Endorphin shoes feature revolutionary SPEEDROLL technology, which aims to propel you forward effortlessly towards that athletic edge, so you can run faster and not harder. Delivering an off-road running experience like no other. This lightweight, yet maximally cushioned, shoe is designed to carry you up, down, and over even the gnarliest of trails, taking speed to a whole new height.

Made to provide incredible spring and return from a thick bed of ultralight PWRRUN PB cushioning, the midsole used works to cushion the foot on impact, reducing the stress and strain your feet endure, which translates to reduced risk of injury as your feet are protected.

The midsole also works to provide a springy rebound, utilising the force from your last step to power you into your next one. The intended result is less energy loss and a reduced rate of fatigue, meaning you can go further and faster. A net mesh also covers the midsole area to protect it from the rugged terrain.

Saucony Endorphin Trail

Terrain: The propulsive shoe suited best to hard-packed trails .

Technology & key features:  SPEEDROLL technology to allow you to roll over the trails, PWRRUN PB cushioning to give you a light and fast feel, and an ultra-grippy PWRTRAC outsole.

Feel of the shoe:  Soft cushioning with SPEEDROLL technology aims to push you onto your toes and help propel you forwards.

Saucony Endorphin Trail Mid

Terrain: The protective shoe for the same terrain as the Endorphin Trail but with a more protective upper suited to dusty paths and gravel.

Technology & key features:  SPEEDROLL technology to allow you to roll over the trails, PWRRUN PB cushioning to give you a light and fast feel, and an ultra-grippy PWRTRAC outsole. A mid-cut upper for a more protective fit.

Distance:  Short to middle-distance runs.

Feel of the shoe:  Soft cushioning with SPEEDROLL technology pushes you onto your toes and helps propel you forwards. The higher-fitting upper makes your feet feel more protected.

Shop all Saucony Endorphin Trail shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Endorphin Edge

Weight: 255g (men's)/ 221g (women's) Drop: 6mm Lug depth: 4mm Support: Neutral

Break boundaries and release your inner trail seeker with the Saucony Endorphin Edge - a shoe designed to be super-fast, lightweight and cushioned for next-level performance.

The Endorphin Edge is packed with PWRRUN PB foam cushioning and a Carbitex™ carbon-fibre plate that helps propel you forward. This flexible carbon-fibre plate should provide speed and efficiency, and despite featuring a high-stack cushioned midsole, you can still enjoy a close connection to the ground. Featuring 4mm lugs on the outsole for ample grip on rugged terrain.

With both higher absorption and faster evaporation, the lightweight mesh of the upper helps pull moisture away from your foot, which means you keep cool and stay dry.

In comparison to other models, it's the only one to feature a 3-quarter length plate carbon-fibre plate and is the lightest and fastest Saucony trail shoe in the range. It also has a higher drop (6mm) than the Peregrine 12 and Endorphin Trail, which are both 4mm.

Terrain: The light and fast shoe for hard packed trails and forest paths – the kind of ground you can run fast on.

Technology & key features:  Carbitex™ carbon-fibre plate to propel you up hills and along the trails, Speedroll technology to allow you to roll over the trails, PWRRUN PB cushioning to give you a light and fast feel and an ultra-grippy PWRTRAC outsole.

Feel of the shoe:  Lightweight, fast and plenty of cushioning.

Shop all Saucony Endorphin Edge shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Xodus Ultra

Weight: 293g (men's)/ 259g (women's) Drop: 6mm Lug depth: 4.5mm Support: Neutral

For those who see the horizon and dare to explore further, meet the Saucony Xodus Ultra. Built for long trails, this shoe is made to go the distance.

Specifically designed for the long-haul, the Xodus Ultra aims to provides the ultra-comfort you desire for the ultra-distance you demand. Featuring a new design that’s been formulated to give you more room and more comfort as you take on extra miles. Get maximum spring with ultralight and ultra-plush PWRRUN PB cushioning and added durability and support, with a resilient PWRRUN Frame to help revive your stride and a stable feeling.

This shoe aims to provide maximum energy return and has a redesigned 3-piece PWRTRAC outsole for traction on off-road terrain. This shoe has a 6mm drop and 4.5mm lugs for superb grip.

Enjoy more comfort with a roomier toe box and a contoured sockliner which hugs your foot for a perfect fit. a more minimal upper should decrease irritation hotspots and a new debris shield keep out mud and loose stones. It also features a rock-plate in the midsole for added protection against sharp rocks underfoot.

Terrain: A cushioned shoe for covering a variety of terrain over a long period of time.

Technology & key features:  A max cushioned trail shoe without any extra weight. PWRRUN PB cushioning combines with a durable PWRRUN Frame to help revive your stride and an ultra-grippy PWRTRAC outsole. Durable protection with an improved rock plate.

Distance:  Ideal for long runs and ultra-distances.

Feel of the shoe:  Soft, ultra-plush cushioning, with a roomy toe box allows your feet to spread.

Shop all Saucony Xodus Ultra shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Ride 15 TR and Ride 15 GTX

Weight: 261g (men's)/ 241g (women's) Drop: 8mm Lug depth: 3.5mm Support: Neutral

Built using softer cushioning and grippy tread, the Saucony Ride 15 TR road to trail shoe has more foam, a durable feel, and everything you need to go further.

The Ride 15 TR has a PWRTRAC outsole and lightweight and durable upper, with a FORMFIT design and supportive webbing, which aims to hug your foot to provide a more personalised feel.

The soft PWRRUN cushioning formula gives you more cushion and less weight for springy trail and road runs. A higher stack and a PWRRUN+ sockliner give you an extra layer of cushioning to help deliver an easy stride from heel-to-toe.

Like the Excursion TR16, this shoe has the highest drop of any Saucony trail shoe at 8mm, which means it's more suitable for heel strikers.

Saucony Ride 15 TR

Terrain: The road to trail shoe suited for mixing road and trail in one run.

Technology & key features:  PWRRUN cushioning for comfortable road miles coupled with a PWRTRAC grippy tread for light trails. A FORMFIT design for a more personalised fit.

Feel of the shoe:  Feels like a road running shoe with extra grip.

Saucony Ride 15 TR GTX

Terrain: The waterproof shoe for the same road to trail terrain as the Saucony Ride 15 TR but with a Gore-Tex upper.

Technology & key features:  PWRRUN cushioning for comfortable road miles coupled with a PWRTRAC grippy tread for light trails and an invisible fit GORE-TEX upper to keep your feet dry when mixing road and trail.

Feel of the shoe:  Feels like a road running shoe with extra grip. The GORE-TEX upper doesn’t change the fit - choose your usual size.

Shop all Saucony Ride 15 TR shoes on SportsShoes here

Saucony Excursion TR16 GTX

Weight: 286g (men's)/ 241g (women's) Drop: 8mm Lug depth: 4.5mm Support: Neutral

The springy, comfortable Excursion TR16 GTX trail shoes are designed for all-round performance on the trails and are made to be suitable for both walking and trail running. Featuring GORE-TEX membrane in the upper material which provides protection against, rain, mud and moisture, meaning you remain comfortable and dry in all-weather conditions.

This shoe has a thick and responsive Versarun midsole which gives long-lasting, high performing cushioning, for protection and comfort to last a long day on the trail. This cushioning offers a soft landing with every step, absorbing heavy impacts but also dispersing energy evenly for a smoother ride.

The durable outsole features an XT-900 carbon rubber for outstanding performance and grip, with 4.5mm carbon-rubber lugs to provide the best traction. Whether you are clambering through muddy terrain or grassy grounds, you should feel unstoppable.

Like the Saucony Ride 15 TR GTX, this shoe has an 8mm drop, which is the highest heel-to-toe offset in the Saucony Trail Collection.

Terrain: The all-rounder trail shoe for a mixture of walking and running on grass and light trails with a GORE-TEX upper to keep your feet dry.

Technology & key features:  Featuring VERSARUN Cushioning and GORE-TEX upper to keep your feet dry from your morning walk to your trail run.

Distance:  Short walks and runs.

Feel of the shoe:  Comfortable cushioning and a rugged outsole.

Shop all Saucony Excursion TR16 GTX shoes on SportsShoes here

Header image credit: SportsShoes

This article was originally published on SportsShoes.com

For all the latest news, tips and gear reviews, sign up to the  Trail Running Newsletter .

Author Description

• Shoe Reviews
• New Runners
• Stability Guide
• Plated Shoes
• Walking Guide
• Running Science

DOCTORS OF RUNNING

Physical Therapists Using Clinical Analysis To Discuss The Art And Science Behind Running and The Stuff We Put On Our Feet

• Beginner's Guide

Post Page Advertisement [Top]

• Saucony Peregrine 12 Review

Saucony Peregrine 12 Price: $129.95 at Running Warehouse Weight: 9.7 oz, 275 g (men's size 9), 8.3 oz, 235 g  (women's size 8) Stack Height: 26.5 mm, 22.5 mm Drop: 4 mm Classification: Neutral Trail Trainer

RUNNING SHOE SUMMARY Megan: These shoes are an excellent option for trail runners of all experience levels. Except for the lugs on the outsole and the forefoot rock plate, they aren’t drastically different from the typical daily trainer in terms of stability and weight. Compared to other trail shoes (Hoka Speedgoat 4 = 9.2oz (W), Altra Lone Peak 6 = 8.7oz (W), Nike Pegasus Trail 3 = 9.3oz (W)), the Peregrines a relatively light option making it easier to navigate more technical trails including avoiding rocks, branches, roots, etc. With the forefoot rock plate, this shoe is a solid option regardless of the terrain. Living in the Northeast, and testing these shoes in the winter season is an important note to address. The PWRRUN EVA foam is at a disadvantage in these colder conditions, causing the foam to be stiffer than it would be in warmer spring/summer weather. In turn, this effects the responsiveness and flexibility of the shoe. Andrea: I was really excited to receive the Peregrine 12 for testing. I did a lot of trail running a few years ago as I transitioned from cycling to running, and the Peregrine was my favorite for Connecticut’s technical trails and on snow. My only gripe about older versions of the Peregrine was how stiff the outsole was; if I did any running on pavement, I would get hot spots at my lateral forefoot. The updated 12 is lighter and has a more flexible outsole, which made me very curious to see if its performance on firmer ground had improved while still maintaining its excellent grip.

FIT Megan: The Peregrine 12s fit true-to-size in terms of length and width (I’m a size 6.5 regular width). The heel cup is firm allowing for added stability in the rearfoot which is useful when navigating technical trails. One downside of the heel cup for me is that it came up higher on the heel, leading to rubbing and blisters on the back of my heels. Luckily this didn’t irritate the actual Achilles tendon, however is something to keep in mind for runners with chronic Achilles’ tendinitis. The shoe also offers a firm toe bumper, providing protection from kicking rocks, branches, ice, etc. There’s also a toe gaiter attachment, providing the option to add a gaiter for more protection of the foot/ankle.  The shoe offers a comfortable and secure lockdown throughout the foot which can be attributed to a couple different factors. First, there is an added sock liner in the shoe which essentially hugs and contours to the foot increasing comfort. Second, the lacing system provides lockdown throughout the midfoot. The lacing lockdown provides the security needed for sharp turns and quick steps on the trails/snow. Combine that with the sock liner and you get the perfect combination of security AND comfort.  The upper is a lightweight mesh with pliable overlays to protect from trail elements. While the mesh is thin, breathable, moisture-wicking, the feet tend to get pretty cold in winter weather. The sock liner serves as an additional layer throughout the midfoot, however leaves the forefoot cold in wintry conditions requiring thicker/warmer socks when wearing these. Again, I tested these during a cold, Northeast winter. In the warmer spring/summer months, these will likely be a great option because of the breathability factor. Andrea: The Saucony Peregrine 12 fits true to size in my usual women’s 9.5. The fit is similar to any non-Endorphin Saucony shoe (I go ½ size up in the Endorphin line). I find that the fit of the Peregrine is most similar to the Kinvara. The width of the forefoot is moderate; there is enough room to move my toes, but this is definitely not a “foot-shaped” shoe like Altra or Topo. The Peregrine feels slightly wider in the forefoot as compared to the Kinvara. The new upper is mesh and stabilizes the foot without being constrictive. It is very breathable and drains well when running in rain or through puddles. There is a firm external heel counter that wraps around the calcaneus on both sides and a lightly padded internal heel counter. I did experience some heel irritation during one run in which I wore thicker wool socks, but had no irritation when wearing normal thickness running socks. The gusseted tongue is lightly padded and stays in place. The flat laces lock the foot down securely. The PWRRUN+ sockliner adds some cushion and comfort. The Peregrine has always been a stiff shoe due to the rockplate and I found older versions of the Peregrine to be too stiff for any pavement running. The 12 feels slightly more flexible than previous versions and I was able to run about 3 miles on pavement in them before getting hot spots at my lateral forefoot.

PERFORMANCE Megan: The Saucony Peregrine provides a smooth and comfortable ride on all surface types tested, making it a solid option for runs consisting of trails, both roads and trails, and snow/icy conditions. The shoe has some responsiveness and bounce (albeit limited), but the lightweight feature of the shoe makes up for this. In a trail shoe, a primary focus is on stability and protection of the foot against various terrain. The Peregrine 12s have a rock plate which adds protection, but may serve to limit some of the responsiveness/bounce. If I had to choose between responsiveness or element-protection, I would choose protection for a trail shoe. The new lightweight design of the 12s makes up for the decreased responsiveness of the midsole, making it easier to navigate trails and clearing obstacles (rocks, branches, roots, etc.). The forefoot has a toe spring which helps to propel you forward onto your toes. The forefoot also offers a new rock plate, providing necessary protection when landing on rocks, branches, ice, etc.     As mentioned earlier, the EVA component of the midsole foam results in increased stiffness during colder conditions which also decreases the responsiveness of the shoe. The midsole has a relatively low stack height, which allows for some ground feel while running. Despite not keeping the feet warm on cold winter days, the upper is a redeeming quality of the Peregrines when it comes to performance. The upper is durable and contours to the foot allowing for free motion of the midfoot and forefoot. However, the lockdown of the upper and sock-liner adds enough security required for making sharp turns, lateral movements, quick steps – all motions required for a successful trail run.      The PWRTRAC outsole of the Peregrine 12s was updated with a new multi-directional lug pattern which increases efficiency of clearing debris from the bottom of the shoe. When running through piles of snow after a recent snowstorm, the shoes quickly lost any packed snow/slush from the bottom, making it easier to push off step after step. In conjunction to the ease of debris clearing, the PWRTRAC outsole provides excellent grip and traction on all surface types. Andrea: The Peregrine 12 has the best traction out of any trail shoe I’ve worn. It gives me complete confidence when running on snowy or muddy trails. I was even able to run on a packed down, icy dirt trail with confidence and with minimal loss of traction. The 5mm lugs really bite into the ground and allow me to plant my foot and push off with confidence, without changing my stride. The PWRTRAC outsole sheds mud and snow very well; it has never gotten bogged down, even after 4 miles on a muddy dirt road. The 4mm drop makes the shoe more nimble and helps me maintain my preferred midfoot landing pattern, which also improves stability on loose surfaces. I find that shoes with drop >8mm tend to result in some heel contact for me, which can cause slippage on loose trails. I had no problem picking up the pace in these shoes off-road, but they feel a little flat on pavement due to the stiff outsole. Previous versions of the Peregrine felt a little too heavy for racing, but the 12 is light enough that it would excel for races on very technical terrain. The cutouts in the mid and forefoot as well as the decoupled heel contribute to improved outsole flexibility. The improved flexibility of the 12 also results in slightly improved ground feel, a feature that was lacking in previous Peregrines. The shoe is best suited to technical or loose terrain and would not be my first choice for firm trails or roads. While the PWRRUN+ sockliner provides some cushioning, it is not enough to make this a shoe of choice for hard surfaces.

STABILITY Megan: Being a trail shoe, stability is an important factor when it comes to efficiency, protection, and comfort. The Peregrine 12 provides adequate stability thanks to a few main factors. First, the lockdown of the midfoot provides the necessary stability for quick movements and turns required on trails. Second, the multidirectional lugs provide added stability and traction on a variety of surface types. Third, while the outsole narrows at the midfoot, it still provides enough width to support the midfoot, specifically the medial arch. Fourth, the dense PWRRUN foam adds firmness to the midsole resulting in more stability. Due to the stiffness of the foam, it does place some additional stress on the lower leg due to decreased surface compliance. The stiffness of the foam is less responsive than a typical neutral trainer which is necessary in this shoe for comfort and protection on the trails. The toe spring in the mid/forefoot helps account for this firmness of the foam, providing a forward propulsion and rocker for push-off. Andrea: The Peregrine 12 is a neutral shoe with mild non-traditional stability features. The external heel counter is very firm and does a great job of stabilizing the heel without causing irritation. The wider midfoot provides some stability through mid-stance and may provide mild resistance to inversion sprains. The mild toe spring promotes push off without feeling aggressive. The redesigned, slipper-like upper helps lock the foot down and promotes stability on uneven terrain or when making sharp turns.

THOUGHTS AS A DPT / FOOTWEAR SCIENCE What is “ground feel” and why is it important?, By Megan Flynn Ground feel refers to the ability for the foot to feel and detect the surface underneath it which aids in proprioceptive awareness (the body’s ability to orient itself through space or movement). We use proprioception with every movement and the more feedback, the better the quality of movement. A majority of this feedback comes from pressure receptors which are mostly located in the feet. In less than a split second, these pressure receptors relay information back to the spinal cord via an afferent neural pathway. The spinal cord then sends a message via an efferent neural pathway back to the muscles, tendons, and joints of the foot and ankle with instructions on how to respond to the sensory information. With all of this happening faster than the blink of an eye, it is clear how important the feedback of ground feel is when running on either roads or trails. The level of cushioning in a shoe increases or decreases ground-feel. In maximally cushioned, high-stack shoes the ground feel is decreased due to the high amount of foam in the midsole. The cushioning essentially acts as a barrier, blocking the proprioceptive system’s effectiveness, and therefore the body’s awareness of position in space. Conversely, in minimalist shoes with less foam and cushion the foot has an increased ability to feel the ground beneath it and respond appropriately. For trail running, a balance is needed because without enough cushioning the feet aren’t protected from the elements encountered including roots, rocks, and uneven terrain. In trail shoes ground-feel and proprioception are arguably more important than in road shoes due to the need for agility and quick responses to different surfaces and terrain. Having more ground-feel allows for more sensory feedback, thus resulting in muscles, tendons, and joints working together to provide awareness and quick adaptations on uneven surfaces. Increased awareness and feedback can help to improve quality of movement and avoid injuries such as ankle sprains when running on uneven trails. One of the best features (in my opinion) of the Saucony Peregrine 12s, relates to the ground feel.  They have a relatively low stack height (26.5mm heel/22.5mm toe) when compared to other common trail shoes. For example: Hoka Speedgoat 4 (32mm heel/28mm toe), Altra Lone Peak 6 (26mm heel/26mm toe), Nike Pegasus Trail 3 (36mm heel/26mm toe), Hoka Challenger ATR 6 (37mm heel/32mm toe). The low stack height of the Peregrine 12s provide an advantage over most trail shoes because they allow for more proprioceptive feedback and ground feel thus resulting in more stability and injury-prevention on the trails. Despite the lower stack height, the Peregrines don’t sacrifice protection due to the added rock plate, toe bumper, and outsole lugs. Overall, the ground-feel of the Peregrines combined with adequate protection on the trails make them an outstanding choice when hitting the trails.

RECOMMENDATIONS Megan: The Peregrine 12s are a lightweight, secure trail shoe serving as a great option for runners of all levels. One recommendation for future models – which could result in an even lighter shoe – is to lower the heel cup to avoid irritation at the heel/Achilles. As mentioned earlier, the heel cup rubs higher on the back of the heel leading to blisters and could be a potential irritator to the Achilles tendon. Andrea: The Peregrine 12 is the best version of the Peregrine I have tried. I would be hard pressed to think of another trail shoe that performs better on loose terrain, particularly snow and mud, as compared to the Peregrine. I think that the overall performance of the shoe could be improved if Saucony could make the outsole even more flexible while maintaining the lug pattern, which is what provides such excellent grip. It does appear that Saucony made the forefoot slightly wider than previous versions and I would encourage them to maintain this feature, which allows for slight toe splay and improved forefoot stability.

WHO THIS SHOE IS FOR Megan: The Saucony Peregrine 12 is a good option for runners of all levels from new to experienced trail runners. The lightweight quality makes them a potential option for trail racing, providing the comfort, traction, and stability required for quick movements on the trails. With a midsole consisting of EVA foam, these will likely perform better in warmer temperatures (>40deg) and will increase the responsiveness of the shoe. I’m looking forward to testing these out more in warmer temperatures where the EVA foam won’t be as stiff and the breathability of the upper can be taken advantage of. With the new and improved outsole, rock plate, lower weight, and sock liner, I would consider these one of the more versatile trail shoes on the market. Andrea: The Saucony Peregrine 12 is for runners looking for a trail shoe that performs exceptionally well on technical, loose terrain. It is my #1 choice for snowy runs due to its unrivaled traction. It is for runners who do not require traditional stability features and prefer a lower drop shoe. If you enjoy the fit and ride of the Kinvara on the road, you will probably like the Peregrine for the trails.

GRADING Megan Fit: B+ ( The fit is true-to-size in terms of length and width. The irritation caused from the high heel cup was enough to decrease points for me in this category.) Performance: B+ ( The EVA foam in the cold weather resulted in lost points in this category. The increased stiffness of the foam led to decreased responsiveness and bounce) Stability: A- ( Between the midfoot lockdown, sock-liner, and lacing system, these shoes provide adequate stability for all surface types that I was able to test them on) DPT/Footwear Science: A ( The relatively high ground feel of the Peregrines when compared to other trail shoes, puts this shoe above most when it comes to sensory feedback and injury prevention on the trails.) Personal: A- ( The biggest negative for me was the high heel cup irritating and causing blisters. The traction, comfort, and stability of the shoe make up for this minor irritation) Overall: A- (The Peregrine 12s have become a go-to option for me during the winter months when running in snowy and icy conditions. They’re a great option for tough terrain/conditions while not adding too much weight relative to a typical trainer. The traction provided by the lugs and the grip of the PWRTRAC outsole provide stability on all surfaces.) ) Andrea Fit: A (wider forefoot allows for slight toe splay, slipper-like upper provides excellent lock down, secure heel counter)           Performance:  A- (the best on snowy or muddy terrain due to excellent traction. A- due to outsole being too firm for much pavement running) Stability: B- (not a stability shoe, for runners who can tolerate 4mm drop and do not require traditional stability features) DPT/Footwear Science: B (improved ground feel as compared to previous versions, but lacking compared to other low drop trail shoes) Personal: A- (the best shoe for loose terrain, A- due to stiff outsole limiting pavement running) Overall:  B+/A- (my #1 choice for technical trail running, could be improved with more flexible outsole)   

SHOP | SUPPORT DOR * Saucony Peregrine 12 Price: $129.95 at Running Warehouse * Using the link to purchase helps support Doctors of Running. Thanks so much! Check out Gear We Love New Balance Rebel v2 : One of the most fun trainers of 2021 so far Asics Metaspeed Sky : Chief Editor Matt Klein can't stop racing in it, even on trails (not advised) Feetures Socks : Massively grippy socks that will make you feel more one with the shoe Ultraspire Fitted Race Belt: The best way to carry your phone and goods on the run. No bounce and various sizes for waist Skratch Recovery, Coffee Flavor : Mental and physical boost post run. Coffee flavor is excellent and goes great straight into a fresh brewed cup Trigger Point Foam Roller : Help get those knots out post-run and feel better for tomorrow Theragun Massager : This small version is great on the go for working tired legs Ciele Hat : Our team's favorite running hat of choice!

FOLLOW DOCTORS OF RUNNING ON SOCIAL MEDIA Facebook: Doctors of Running Youtube Channel: Doctors of Running Instagram: @doctorsofrunning LinkedIn: Doctors of Running Strava: Doctors of Running Podcast: Virtual Roundtable Pinterest: Doctors of Running

Bach Pham, MA

Bottom ad [post page], search doctors of running, brooks ghost 16 review, brooks ghost 16 review (2024).

Brooks Ghost 16  Review By Matthew Klein and David Salas The Brooks Ghost is one of the long standing daily trainers that most runners can n...

• Shoe Reviews Archive at Doctors of Running (2024)
• Guide to Stability Running Shoes (2024)
• Doctors of Running Podcast
• Carbon Plated Resource Page
• Running Shoe Science
• Running Research Archive - Doctors of Running
• Beginner's Guide to Running Shoes
• Guide to Walking Shoes

DOR Archive

• ►  May (2)
• ►  April (26)
• ►  March (22)
• ►  February (21)
• ►  January (24)
• ►  December (24)
• ►  November (17)
• ►  October (20)
• ►  September (21)
• ►  August (21)
• ►  July (22)
• ►  June (17)
• ►  May (18)
• ►  April (22)
• ►  March (20)
• ►  February (15)
• ►  January (15)
• ►  December (20)
• ►  November (19)
• ►  October (19)
• ►  September (19)
• ►  August (18)
• ►  July (18)
• ►  June (20)
• ►  April (20)
• ►  March (19)
• Nike Structure 24 Review (2021 Release)
• Best Shoes for Posterior Tibialis Pain | DOR Podca...
• Hoka Speedgoat 5 Review (2022 Release)
• Craft CTM Carbon Race Rebel Review
• What are Rocker Soles and What Benefits do they Ha...
• Puma Velocity Nitro 2 Review (Updated)
• Craft CTM Ultra Carbon 2 Review
• Craft CTM Ultra 2 Review
• Topo Athletic MTN Racer 2 Review (2021 Release)
• Defining Shoe Categories, Favorite Long-Distance R...
• Hoka Cielo X LD Track Spike Review
• The Best Run Commute Apparel (PT Tested and Approved)
• Selecting Shoes for Newer Runners, How Long Should...
• January 2022 Round-Up at Doctors of Running
• ►  January (13)
• ►  November (12)
• ►  October (10)
• ►  September (14)
• ►  August (15)
• ►  July (12)
• ►  June (7)
• ►  May (13)
• ►  April (9)
• ►  March (13)
• ►  February (10)
• ►  January (6)
• ►  December (7)
• ►  November (5)
• ►  October (13)
• ►  September (4)
• ►  August (5)
• ►  July (9)
• ►  June (3)
• ►  May (6)
• ►  March (8)
• ►  February (4)
• ►  January (3)
• ►  December (3)
• ►  November (4)
• ►  October (4)
• ►  September (6)
• ►  August (4)
• ►  July (7)
• ►  June (4)
• ►  May (5)
• ►  April (1)
• ►  March (3)
• ►  February (3)
• ►  December (2)
• ►  November (3)
• ►  October (1)
• ►  September (3)
• ►  August (3)
• ►  July (2)
• ►  May (3)
• ►  April (2)
• ►  February (2)
• ►  January (2)
• ►  December (4)
• ►  November (2)
• ►  October (2)
• ►  July (5)
• ►  June (6)
• ►  May (1)
• ►  January (5)
• ►  December (5)
• ►  September (1)
• ►  August (2)
• ►  March (1)
• ►  February (1)
• ►  June (1)
• ►  March (2)
• ►  December (1)
• ►  August (1)
• ►  June (2)

Contact Form

Strava - join the doctors of running run club, doctors of running strava club activities.

• All Reviews: Road & Trail Run Shoes, Gear & Tech By Brand
• Latest Run Shoe, Hiking & Gear Reviews & Articles
• 2024 Run Introductions
• Reviewer Bios
• RTR German, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Polish Run Shoe & Gear Reviews
• RoadTrailRide Bike and Bike Gear Reviews
• Fastpacking/Backpacking/ Trekking/ Ski Mo Reviews
• Race Reports & Racer Stories
• Privacy Policy

Thursday, January 20, 2022

Saucony peregrine 12 multi tester review: same great taste, less filling lighter, grippier, faster & superb fitting. 12 comparisons.

Article by Renee Krusemark, Jeff Valliere, John Tribbia, Jacob Brady, and Mike Postaski

Saucony Peregrine 12 ($130)

Introduction

Jeff V:  I have run in every Peregrine since version 5 and they have always been a favorite of mine.  Early iterations were well protected, reasonably light, fast, but super stiff and I had trouble with heel lift and blistering. Even so, I appreciated their competence in technical terrain.  

Eventually, those concerns I had with stiffness and heel blistering were eliminated, but there was a steady upward trend in weight, mass and bulk, to the point where the Peregrine morphed from a lowish, lightish trail racer, to a more all around daily trainer for longer distances. I still liked the newer versions a lot, but in my mind, they were really no longer related to the Peregrine of old.  

Enter the Peregrine 12.  The Peregrine 12 has dropped 1.5 oz in my US men’s size 10, mostly due to the full reworking of the upper, as well as a new outsole.  While the midsole remains unchanged, the drop in weight along with the aforementioned changes brings the Peregrine back to being a fast, technical trail racing shoe.  They are also significantly more flexible, without really losing any underfoot protection.

Significant drop in weight from previous versions, now racing-class weight for such a capable shoe - Jacob/Jeff V/ Sam/Renee /Mike P

Excellent fit; soft materials, enough space to be comfortable, but locked in and secure - Jacob/Jeff V/Sam/Renee/John /Mike P

Stable with good ground feel from the relatively firm midsole combined with a substantial TPU bead sockliner - Jacob/Jeff V/Sam/Renee/John /Mike P

Style: streamlined, bright, and fun but not overly flashy - Jacob/Jeff V/Sam/Renee

Great traction on a variety of terrain - Jacob/Jeff V/Renee/Mike P.

Almost 100% recycled content in the upper-Sam/Jacob/Jeff V/Mike P

Updated lug pattern much improved at shedding mud - Mike P

A bit firm for my preferences on hard surfaces such as pavement - Jacob/Sam/Jeff V/John

Ride can feel a bit flat on moderate/runnable terrain - Mike P

Weight: men's 9.6 oz  / 272g (US9)  /  women's 8.32oz / 237g (US8)

  Samples: men’s  9.29 oz  /  263g US (8.5),  9.8 oz / 278g (US 9.5), 10.1 oz / 285g (US10)

                   women's 8.32oz / 237g (US8)

Stack Height: 26.5mm  heel / mm 22.5 forefoot 

$130. Available now including at our partners at the end of the article.

First Impressions and Fit

Jeff V: Out of the box I am immediately struck by the noticeable drop in weight, the retooled, minimal and streamlined upper, the newly redesigned outsole and increased flexibility. The Peregrine is back!  The yellow colorway of my review sample is for sure loud, but I like the look and they certainly do pop.  Fortunately, there are more mellow color options available for those who prefer a more modest look.  Fit is true to size and the new streamlined and pared down upper is exceptionally comfortable and accommodating, with a little bit of stretch, which I believe will accommodate a wider range of feet.

Renee: Jeff V said it all. The weight is the story here. Eve nbefore weighing the shoes, the difference in weight in hand between the 11 and 12 is dramatic. I ran the Peregrine 11, GTX, and ST, and my only major fault for those shoes was the weight. Losing more than 1 ounce in a women’s size 8 is a miracle, but Saucony somehow made it happen. Still more amazing is the performance and fit of the Peregrine are not compromised. For sizing, typical Saucony size for me.

John: Out of the box, the Peregrine 12 looks so awesome. The yellow is fun and brings a great contrast to the trails. The upper looks refined and, as Jeff said above, it is less bulky and padded than the previous models. The fit is true to size and has great midfoot and heel hold with enough toe room to not feel constricting.  Not only are the 12s considerably lighter, they feel lighter on the foot and are very responsive.

Mike P: Out of the box, the first thing that jumps out at you is that they look so much more streamlined than previous versions. The upper feels much thinner and more flexible than previous versions which seemed to be a sandwich of overly thick layers. The weight loss is clearly noticeable both in hand and on foot. If you looked at the shoe and disregarded the trail outsole, you could easily mistake them for lightweight Kinvaras. I’m glad to see Saucony re-positioning this shoe into the lightweight/possible racer category. They don’t really have a presence in that category, aside from the Switchback which is not technically-oriented.

Jeff V:  The upper of the Peregrine 12 is a radical improvement over the previous version.  Don’t get me wrong, the upper of the Peregrine 11 is amazing, exceptionally comfortable, padded and secure, but Saucony has really trimmed the fat so to speak, reducing a lot of the extraneous padding in the tongue, the heel collar and overall replacing with thinner, lighter, more flexible and breathable materials.  

In doing so, they really reduced the weight of this shoe, without compromising comfort or foothold.  The lighter, more compliant and flexible upper materials allow for a bit of flex, or perhaps a better way to describe is it just less stiff and confining, which provides the sensation of more roomy flexibility and give to them.  

While the foothold does not have quite the same “locked in” feel as before (Peregrine 11 right above) I have found that the new upper provides an equally secure, predictable and confidence inspiring feel when running fast on technical terrain, be it fast rock hopping, steep off trail, off camber side hilling, etc…..  In fact, I set an unexpected PR on a very steep, technical, sometimes off camber and dynamic off trail segment which caught me off guard, as I was not trying and I also never once thought of the shoe on my foot or the security.  This lack of thinking about the shoe is the ultimate testament in my opinion to a shoe’s performance and prowess.  

I have found the reduction in padding around the heel collar and tongue to not have any negative effects on comfort, nor do I feel any lace bite, as Saucony has strategically placed bolstered tabs at the top center of the tongue for added protection.  While the upper is thinner and lighter than the previous model, I first wondered if protection from rocks and dings might be compromised, but thus far have not noticed any weakness as there are plentiful protective overlays down low.

Renee: As compared to the previous version, the upper is now a lighter, more race-orientated fit, style, and weight. The security remains great, as was the case with the Peregrine 11. As Jeff V wrote, the padding in the tongue and heel collar is reduced. I did not notice a change in comfort from the upper changes, but I did notice the improvement in flexibility. The breathability seems improved from version 11. 

For cold weather running, I wore wool socks and had no issues with cold weather or moisture. The upper will show a lot of dirt/mud, but it cleans up well enough. 

Over time, I wonder if the durability of the upper will hold up as compared to the previous version. 

The heel collar sat higher on my foot as compared to the previous version, which might be caused by a change in the midsole instead of the upper’s collar. I had some slight irritation from the high collar, but not a deal breaker. 

John: The upper provides a comfortable and secure fit. This updated version is notably focused on less and that’s a good thing. Overall, there is reduced padding throughout, the upper material is thinner, and the toe bumper is more strategically built into the upper as opposed to being a rubber toe cap.  

The minimal overlays and integrated sockliner ensure that the fit envelopes your foot, providing exceptional security. 

And, as Jeff and Renee point out, despite the reduction in padding in upper I noticed no compromises with performance. 

I felt secure and protected in mellow to gnarly terrain. The lacing is extremely efficient that secures the foot easily and well; there is still a convenient lace storage strap that keeps laces from going all over the place in this version. I’ve worn the shoe in warm and cold temperatures and I found it breathable enough for the warm days and my feet didn’t turn to icicles on the really cold runs. 

Jacob: The Peregrine 12 upper is sleek and streamlined with enough structure and padding to be comfortable and locked in but without much excess. The nearly 100% recycled mesh is soft on the foot and breathes well. In sub-freezing temperatures (with wool socks) my toes didn’t freeze, so it’s not overly airy. 

The elegant, gusseted, semi-bootie tongue reminds me of the Endorphin road line and works very well here in being simple to lay flat, hugs the foot, and is easy to dial in the right lace pressure. 

The foothold for my medium-width foot is glove-like with a bit more space in the toebox which matches my preferences exactly. There is no slop at all. It is overall similar to the fit of many of Saucony’s road line which typically fit my nearly perfectly true to size. It is an excellent upper overall without unnecessary bulk, a great balance of comfort and hold, and use of recycled materials.

Mike P: Not much for me to add on top of the others’ commentary. I agree that the upper is absolutely secure, but as Jeff V mentions, perhaps not the exact “locked in” feel as the previous version 10/11.  Not issues whatsoever though.  I do find there is slightly more room in the forefoot - which is a very welcome addition. This is possibly due to the upper being slightly more stretchy, but also visually, it seems to me as if the front of the shoe does not taper as sharply toward the very front (in comparison to my version 10’s). 

I did find the heel cup also has slightly more volume, but not by much - it was noticeable with a very thin sock. But I also tried a sock with slightly more heel padding, and the fit was nice and snug. The tongue is also very lightweight, and wraps the foot well. They’ve also (strategically?) placed an extra diamond-shaped piece of thicker material with the Saucony Trail logo and a pull tab at the top of the tongue. I find this sits directly under the lace knot and eliminates any pressure that might have been felt through the thinner tongue.

Sizing-wise, it seems Saucony has adjusted ever slightly to be a true 9.5. I find just a slight touch more volume all around, bringing it in line with other brands’ sizing. I found that previously my Saucony size 9.5’s were always the most snug in that size.

Renee: While Saucony advertises the midsole as a “soft, springy PWRRUN cushioning,” I don’t quite get a “soft” or “springy” feel from the midsole. For me, the midsole is firm but not harsh. With the dramatic weight reduction, the Peregrine 12 works well for me during short fast runs or long runs. As compared to the previous version, the shoes now function as a race or trainer option, and all at a decent trail shoe price. 

I ran an 18-miler on uneven surfaces and my feet felt great. 

Jeff V:  I find the PWRRUN midsole to have a perfect balance of firmness, cushion, protection, response and predictability that makes the Peregrine 12 ideally suited for technical running at any speed.  While the midsole has reportedly not been changed, I have found that with the overall reduction in weight, the added flexibility due to the improved upper and retooled outsole, the 12 feels so much more quick, responsive and agile.  No matter the terrain, I find this midsole to be adequately cushioned and protective for hours of hard running.  The combination of the PWRRUN midsole and rock plate provide excellent protection, while the now improved flexibility allows for very good ground feel and contouring that I appreciate when running fast through rocky, technical terrain.

Another nice improvement over the previous version is the upgrade to a PWRRUN+ TPU sockliner, which very much improves the overall ride, cushioning and enhances the overall feel of the midsole through the gait cycle.

John: Hard to disagree with what has already been said above. The Peregrine 12 offers a wonderful balance between comfort, response, light weight, and stability. In fact, like Jeff, I felt more inclined to be aggressive in this shoe because the midsole offers a nice balance of cushion that stays comfortable and protective all day long, and predictability + control.  

The midsole performs well at a variety of speeds and distances, though still a bit stiff for it to be a go-to road shoe. Notwithstanding, whether on roads for a brief duration, or on longer outings in the trails with extended downhills, the cushion is really effective at absorbing impact and helping the legs stay fresh.

Jacob: The midsole primarily uses Saucony’s PWRRUN foam which in this deployment is relatively dense and firm. It is also relatively low stack, but is accompanied by a braided rock protection layer and most importantly a thick PWRRUN+ TPU bead sockliner. The sandwich of rubber outsole, flexible rock protection, firm foam, then softer energetic foam creates a stable, protected, and performant shoe with balanced flexibility. It has a touch of bounce from the PWRRUN+ on top of the connected feel of the PWRRUN. I find that overall it is nearing feeling harsh on hard terrain like frozen dirt and pavement, but appreciate the lower feel on more rugged terrain. 

Mike P: The standout feature update for me is the PWRRUN+ TPU beaded insole. It’s quite thick- I’d estimate 5-6mm. I’m sure Saucony was able to shave some weight by eliminating the layer of PWRRUN that was glued to the footbed of previous versions, and integrating that layer of cushion into the new insole. 

In my opinion, TPU insoles are the future - they are much more durable and show very little/no compression over time. I have several of Inov-8’s Boomerang insoles that I swap in and out of different shoes, and they show zero compression. I actually prefer this Saucony TPU version, as it has more contouring and support under the arch. I will definitely be testing this insole in a variety of other shoes.

In terms of cushioning, it is perfectly adequate for what the shoe is designed for. This is really an all-mountain shoe, but not an all-day shoe. Short to moderate distance runs over varied terrain where you value traction, protection, and a bit of ground feel - that is the sweet spot. Saucony really does do a good rock plate. I find it very protective, but flexible enough where you almost don’t notice it’s there. 

As mentioned by others, it’s not a great road shoe, but that’s more due to the outsole than anything else. The cushioning and ride is obviously not tuned to the road. I would say it performs well on dirt or fire roads - the softer the better, since the traction would be an advantage. For extended sections of hard-packed dirt, it wouldn’t be the pick.

Renee: I have seven (I think?) trail shoes with the Saucony PWRTRAC outsole, and all of them work well in mud or soft conditions. The rubber shreds mud easily, the 5mm lugs provide grip and traction, and the spacing between lugs ensures mud is not caked to the bottom. The pattern of the lugs is slightly different from the previous version, but I did not notice any difference. 

Jeff V:  I first thought that the outsole, despite modest changes to the 5mm lugs would be comparable to the already great outsole of the 11, but I was mistaken.  It is surprisingly better!  The new lugs are not quite as broad, leaving a bit more space in between and I believe that the smaller lugs actually penetrate better on loose terrain as well as on frozen, snowy surfaces.  

Additionally, the rubber compound feels a bit more sticky and the added flexibility of the shoe from the front outsole chevron shaped cut outs that now cross the forefoot instead of being longitudinal help the outsole/lugs better conform and adhere to the undulations of the terrain underfoot.  

Even on ice, they grab better than any shoe I have worn without metal spikes built in and while I would not run them on steep bulletproof ice, I was able to safely navigate lower angle strips of icy trail without incident.  Durability thus far has proven to be average to slightly above average and I am confident that they will last a long time over many miles of rough and rocky terrain.

John: The PWRTRAC is awesome. In addition to the comments above, I took these on one of my standard Boulder mountain routes that starts with groomed trail and eventually takes you through highly technical terrain with steep incline/decline. I also tested the Peregrine 12s in snow, ice, mud, dried rutted mud, dry trail, and on road. Let me just say the outsole can handle pretty much anything you throw at it. Like Jeff mentions, the PWRTRAC outsole allows you to confidently navigate a variety of terrain, even some ice. 

Jacob: The Peregrine 12 outsole is awesome. It is all I could ask for in a shoe for all types of runs on technical terrain. Like other shoes I have tested with Saucony’s PWRTRC outsole, the rubber material grips very well in all situations. 

The tried and true directional chevron lugs work on all surfaces and feel fine on smooth terrain. The decoupling in the heel and cutouts in the forefoot contributes to more natural flexibility. Like Jeff and John, I was impressed by the traction on ice.

Mike P: Jeff V sums it up best. The lugs maintain the same shape, but have been spaced out a bit. They absolutely shed mud better. I tested them on wet and soggy dirt roads, and didn’t have any issues with mud caking to the outsoles. This was an issue with previous versions, including my V 10’s. I also feel the outsole performs just as well as previous versions, perhaps even better. The improved flexibility of the shoe does help the lugs “bite” a bit more - as Jeff mentions. 

I had good test conditions with mixed dirt, mud, slush, snow, and solid ice. Traction was excellent on everything aside from solid, polished ice. Side note - raised ice screw anchor spots have been removed, likely to save a bit of weight. I’m sure you could add ice screws directly into the outsole between the lugs, but they would sit a bit lower, so they wouldn’t be as effective as previous versions.  

Renee: Between the secure upper and light weight, the ride is now faster and more nimble as compared to the previous version. For me, the new Peregrine rides quick for fast runs and comfortable enough for longer distance runs. As with any rock-plated shoe with 5mm lugs, I would avoid hard or buffed out trails (ie. terrain you can run with road shoes); otherwise, the Peregrine 12 is versatile. The Peregrine’s ride favors more technical terrain.

John: When I first tested the Peregrine 10s and then the 11s, I found myself feeling flat-footed when running at faster paces. With the 12s, the shoe feels smoother and more responsive, but doesn’t sacrifice the feeling of protection that the previous models boast. As was pointed out before, there is some firmness to the ride making it less enjoyable for longer distances on smooth terrain, but that added structure/support from the platform is nice security when going over anything that would make you wobbly. To that end, I also found it to feel quite nimble on technical terrain, especially when you account for the efficient and secure fit of the upper and perfect amount of midsole cushion that allows for some ground-feel.

Mike P: I ran 50+ miles in these the first week I had them. The longest run was 3 hours, 18 miles, with 3,600 ft of gain over mixed dirt, snow, and ice. I found them well suited up to and probably slightly beyond that range. Beyond 3-4 hours, I’d probably look to something with a bit more cushion - hello Xodus 12?

The ride can feel a bit flat over moderate terrain, but that’s to be expected at a 4mm drop with not much rocker involved. The shoe is tuned more towards security and varied technical running versus smooth straight-line speed. The terrain conditions over my long run were perfect for the Peregrine 12, as I had to navigate constant uneven packed snow and frozen ice. I felt very stable, and protection was adequate for that range, even with the ground being very harsh underfoot.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Renee’s Score: 9.3/10 (-.35 upper durability as a trainer, -.35 high heel collar)

Jeff V:  Renee beat me to the punch, as I was going to say the exact same thing about whether or not to buy the older version at a discount.  I may have encouraged buying the older version at a discount over the last few versions, but the 12 is enough of an overhaul and a major improvement, that I would highly encourage moving on to the 12 (although if you are not pushing the pace, racing, striving for PR’s, then the previous version is still an excellent daily trainer for those who want security, protection, durability and traction). 

Jeff V’s Score:  9.6/10

Ride: 9.5 Fit: 9.5 Value: 9.5 Style: 9.5 Traction: 10 Rock Protection: 9.75

John’s Score:  9.6/10

Ride: 9.5 (energetic and protective)

Fit: 9.5 Value: 9.5 (the 12 is a do everything mountain shoe)

Style:  9.5 (Bright and fun!) 

Traction:  10 (solid shoe for basically anything you put in its way)

Rock Protection: 9.5 (best in class)

Jacob: The Peregrine 12 is an excellent update and a performant, race-ready, technical trail shoe. It is suitable for a variety of paces from jogging to racing on moderate to very technical terrain. It has a locked in but still comfortable fit, stable and quick ride, and 10/10 traction. It uses recycled materials in the upper and has a sleek style that is bright and energetic but not too flashy. I think it would work for most runners as a do-it-all trail shoe. The biggest negative for me is the performance on smooth, hard pack and pavement where it feels a bit flat and hard. For its intended terrain of technical singletrack, you can’t go wrong.

Jacob’s Score:  9.3/10

Ride: 8.5 (30%), Fit: 9.5 (30%), Value: 9.5 (10%), Style: 9.5 (5%), Traction: 10 (15%), Rock Protection: 9.5  (10%)

Mike P : The Peregrine 12 is a great improvement and it feels like this will be a big winner for Saucony. The weight loss as well as streamlined look and feel opens it up to a wide audience.  If you are sticking mainly to trails, and less concerned about road versatility, this is an extremely capable trail/mountain shoe.  If you’re heading out to a new trail, and you’re not sure about the terrain, the Peregrine 12 would be an excellent and versatile choice to bring along.  Value-wise, at $130 you can’t go wrong. This shoe will definitely be a staple in my all around trail running quiver.

Mike P’s Score: 9.30/10

Ride: 9 - Great for varied, technically-oriented terrain

Fit: 9.5 - Slight extra volume in the heel, but otherwise perfect

Value: 9 - Do-it-all trail/mountain shoe for a great price. Will streamlined upper be as durable?

Style: 9.5 - Streamlined look as well as feel

Traction: 9.5 - Classic traction gets even better with improved mud shedding

Rock Protection: 9.5 - Protection while maintaining flexibility over all but the roughest terrain

RoadTrailRun Editor Sam's Video Review from the Snow Trails in Park City, Utah

12 Comparisons

Index to all RTR reviews: HERE

Peregrine 11 ( RTR Review )

Renee: Same great taste, less filling. Seriously, the 12 is the same shoe at a significantly lighter weight. Version 11 has more padding in the tongue and heel collar, but I did not notice a comfort difference. 

Jeff V:  The 12 is not only remarkably lighter, but the fit is more spacious and less confining feeling, while offering comparable foothold, with a more flexible/comfortable upper, which is in and of itself is a remarkable feat.  On top of that, add in the improved flexibility and ground feel, while retaining underfoot protection, a retooled geometry, more responsive and agile feel, with improved and dare I say about the best traction out there (durable too), the 12 is an absolute hit!

John: What else is there to add? The 12 is the plain and simple better choice because it offers the same quality protection and traction, while improving the runnability and shaving ounces from the 11. 

Mike P (US 9.5 - V10): Same points as everyone else. Just want to point out that V12 seems to have a touch more volume all around than my V10, especially in the forefoot. It’s easier to get a snug fit without having to cinch the laces super tight. Also, V12 sheds mud much better.

Inov-8 Terraultra G 270 ( RTR Review )

Renee: The TU G 270 is overall my favorite trail shoe, and is slightly (but noticeably) lighter in weight. While both shoes are nimble, the TU G 270 has a quicker, more nimble ride for me. For protection underfoot and soft terrain/technical trails, the Peregrine might have an advantage. The Peregrine costs less and might work better for runners who do not like zero drops. I wore a women’s size 8 in both, with slightly more room in the toe box in the TU G 270.

Jeff V:  I am the black sheep of the RTR crew, in that I was not crazy about the TU G 270.  At least for my running style and preference for steep mountain terrain, I found the 270 to not have a well enough held upper, nor enough protection underfoot.  It is quick and light, with good traction, but the zero drop is also a bit of a drawback for me.  The Peregrine 12 for my use, exceeds the TU G 270 in every way.

Jacob: I love the G 270 and out of the box was excited that the Peregrine 12 would match or exceed it as it is similar in weight, ground feel, and stack height. Both share a firmer midsole with a softer TPU bead sockliner and excellent secure fit. After testing, the G 270 remains my clear preference as it is more comfortable for me with a wider toebox, softer and more flexible underfoot feel, and better smooth terrain performance. However the traction of the Peregrine 12 is a notch above the already good G 270 and it is more protected which is appreciated on sharp rocks and similarly harsh terrain. I would race the Peregrine 12 on rugged singletrack but tend to not use the G 270 unless terrain is more moderate or I’m going slower. Both are great shoes, my foot shape and ride preferences just lead my to the G 270 for general use. 

Salomon Sense Pro 4 ( RTR Review )

Jeff V:  The Sense Pro 4 is lighter, quicker and more agile, but the Peregrine 12 has better traction and protection, so is more suited to runs exceeding 2 hours and on even more technical terrain.

John: The Sense Pro 4 is one of my favorites. The Salomons are more sock-like and form fitting in the upper, while the Sauconys provide more play and more midsole cushion. If I am going fast and short in more technical terrain, I’ll go with the Sense Pro 4s, but I will put the Peregrines on for anything else.

John: The Sense Pro 4 is one of my favorites. The Salomons are more sock-like and form fitting in the upper, while the Sauconys provide more play and more midsole cushion. If I am going fast and short in more technical terrain, I’ll go with the Sense Pro 4s, but I will put the Peregrines on for anything else. 

Mike P (US 9.5): I find the SP4 much narrower. I mentioned in previous comps that I couldn’t seem to get a good fit with them that didn’t squeeze my forefoot too much. The Peregrine 12 should be much more accommodating to more foot shapes. I also find Saucony’s rock plate is more substantial than Salomon’s Pro Film.  The Peregrine has a wider base than the SP4, which is a bit more agile due to being narrower. In summary, with V12’s weight loss, I find these shoes now very similar - differences being wider fit/platform, and better protection for the Peregrine 12.

Hoka Torrent 2 ( RTR Review )

Jeff: Torrent 2 is 0.3 oz lighter and maybe quicker on moderate trails, but the Peregrine 12 is much more competent on technical trails with better protection and traction.

Topo MTN Racer 2 ( RTR Review )

Renee: Both shoes have secure uppers. The MTN Racer 2 does not have a rock plate and is slightly heavier. As for sizing, I wore a women’s 7.5 in the MTN Racer 2 and a women’s size 8 in the Peregrine. Even at a half size smaller, I have more room in the toebox of the Topo. The MTN Racer 2 has better ground feel and a lower sitting heel collar. For long distances needing protection underfoot, I’d choose the Peregrine. For shorter efforts and a roomy toe box, I’d choose the MTN Racer 2. 

Jeff V:  I find the Peregrine 12 to be much more quick and performance oriented, with slightly better foothold.  The MTN Racer 2 however for me is more suited to longer distances, slower paces and less technical terrain, but only just slightly as the MTN Racer 2 is one of my top performers for 2021.  Peregrine 12 for racing or all out efforts, MTN Racer 2 for less intense daily training.

Mike P (US 9.5): These feel like very different shoes to me. The MTN Racer 2 is more of a cruiser/long distance shoe. I enjoy it as a trainer, as I don’t find the forefoot protection to be enough for very long ultras. The Peregrine 12 is more protective, but less cushioned, so it feels more at home during more technical, but shorter runs. The Peregrine fit is great, and more secure than the Topo, but again the Topo is oriented towards much greater distance/duration.

Topo Ultraventure Pro ( RTR Review )

Renee: Both shoes have a rock plate, an outsole for soft conditions, and secure uppers. The Ultraventure Pro had a harsh ride for me and I had forefoot pain after running it. The Pro might have better ground feel, but the Peregrine 12 is a far better shoe for me. For sizing, the Peregrine 12 runs a half size longer. 

Jeff V:  Agreed with Renee.  As much as I loved the MTN Racer 2, the UV Pro fell flat in my opinion and I also found it to be particularly unstable.

VJ Ultra ( RTR Review )

Jeff V:  The VJ Ultra is a faster, lighter and more responsive shoe, but underfoot protection is not as good as the Peregrine 12’s, which can make a big difference on longer runs that consist of rocky technical terrain.  The VJ Ultra also has a more race like fit with less wiggle room, which some may find constricting in comparison to the Peregrine 12 depending on foot shape/size and preference.  Traction is comparable, but given the outsole durability concerns with the VJ Ultra, I would favor the Peregrine 12 for the durability and longevity.

Jacob: I am surprised to see the Peregrine as Jeff’s pick as I knew he was a big fan of the VJ Ultra. Well, I am also a huge fan of the VJ Ultra and it was my pick for racing shoe and technical trail shoe of the year for 2021. I raced it several times from 6 miles to 32 miles on a variety of terrain and couldn’t imagine a more performant shoe. However, immediately after weighing and trying on the Peregrine 12 I thought it could contend with the VJ Ultra as my pick for technical trail racing this upcoming season. 

There are pros and cons to both for me. The biggest con of the VJ Ultra is, as Jeff noted, the tighter fit. It gave me blisters on my toes on numerous occasions. The Peregrine is nearly as locked in but more comfortable and notably softer around the foot. 

As for ride, the Ultra is softer and foamier feeling. It is also more laterally flexible which can be problematic on uneven terrain. I like the softer underfoot feel for cruising descents and wish the Peregrine were a bit softer, but the additional protection of the Peregrine helps on some terrain. For general training, the Peregrine is more versatile. Overall, both are great shoes for moving fast in technical terrain and which you should choose depends on your foot shape, ride preferences, and intended usage. 

Mike P: These shoes seem like they should occupy different spaces, but due to some limitations with the VJ Ultra, they do end up overlapping quite a bit. The VJ Ultra has much softer cushioning, and is much more flexible. The uppers to me are equally secure, but the VJ toebox definitely tapers sharply leading to a bit of a squeeze up front unless you have narrow feet. The VJ also has a stiffer and taller ankle collar. That being said, I did feel comfortable racing the VJ’s up to the 7-8 hour mark before those issues started to become a problem.  I wouldn’t take the Peregrine’s that far mostly due to the lesser amount of cushion. But like Jeff mentions - the Peregrines are far more protective over more technical terrain. Choosing between the two would likely come down to preference, target terrain, as well as fit/foot shape.

VJ Spark ( RTR Review )

Renee: The VJ Spark is a fun shoe for quick paces, and especially on inclines/declines. The Peregrine 12 offers more protection underfoot because of its rock plate. I would choose the VJ Spark for distances less than 13.1 and the Peregrine 12 for longer distances. I wore a women’s size 8 in both. 

Jeff V:  Agreed with Renee.  The Spark is lighter and better suited for shorter distances due to a thinner midsole and lack of rock plate and also its more secure, race fitting upper and its even superior tread to the Peregrine 12.  That said, the Spark is not nearly as versatile, whereas the Peregrine 12 can cover all of the bases just as well, but also provide so much more protection, versatility and comfort for longer distances and training/racing crossover.

Jacob: I agree with Renee and Jeff. The Spark is my pick for racing short distances for sure as it is lighter and has a glove-like fit and excellent traction that makes it possible to run fast over any terrain. However, I would hesitate to race the Spark anything longer than 10 miles especially if there are long descents, as it is not a very protective shoe. I also see minimal use for the Spark as a trainer except for Strava segment efforts. The Peregrine is much more versatile and works for everything the Spark does (just a bit heavier and less locked-in for shorter races).

Mike P: Agree with everyone - Peregrine wins by far on versatility, especially in the protection department.  The Spark is a blast to run in though, and feels great dancing around. For me the VJ Spark has the best fit of any shoe I have right now.  The Peregrine is good, but not quite the custom-feeling fit of the Spark. I’d take the Peregrine for all-around training, and the Spark for all-out blasts and short racing (I ran a mountainous trail marathon in VJ Sparks).

Scott Supertrac RC 2 ( RTR Review )

Jeff V:  Both shoes are very comparable in use and great for moving fast on technical mountain terrain.  The Peregrine 12 is more durable with a longer lasting outsole and has a more relaxed fit, whereas the RC 2 suffers a bit from outsole wear due to the softer rubber compound.  RC 2 has a more race like fit and less protection underfoot without a rock plate, but the midsole has a softer, more cushioned feel.

Speedland SL:PDX ( RTR Review )

Jeff V:  The Peregrine 12 is lighter, more responsive, has better traction/outsole durability and comparable underfoot protection.  That said, I appreciate the versatility of the Speedland and the soft underfoot cushioned feel that the Pebax midsole insert provides, as well as the versatility to remove/add the carbon plate at will and quickly.  Not many shoes, if any, can come close to the cutting edge Dyneema fiber upper with dual two way BOA dials that provide the absolute best combination of comfort, security, protection and ease of use.  While the two shoes overlap in many ways in regard to usage, I would say the Speedland would be superior for longer distances, where the Peregrine 12 is better for shorter, faster runs.  Of course there is also the few hundred dollar price difference which is a significant factor.

ASICS Fuji Lite 2 ( RTR Review )

John: The Saucony Peregrine 12 is the same weight as the Fuji Lite, but the shoes diverge from there. The Peregrine 12 is more stable, firmer and the upper has a better and lower profile upper that has great foothold and security.  The Peregrine’s traction profile is more aggressive while the Fuji Lite performs really well on crossover terrain such as road and groomed paths. Peregrine 12 is a stiffer shoe with a bit more rock protection and is somewhat runnable on the roads, but not as enjoyable as the Fuji Lite 2.

Mike P (US 10.0): Shoes for different terrains. For the FL2 - the much softer cushion in conjunction with the non-secure upper severely limits it to flat/moderate terrain. Anything with twists or turns will not feel secure. It is very fun to run in its element though. The Peregrine is just the opposite - they’ll feel a bit stiffer on flat/moderate terrain, but super stable and secure when the terrain gets more technical and/or rocky. The Peregrine is much more protective, but I wouldn’t be taking the FL2 in any rocky terrain anyway. The Peregrine is way more versatile overall. 

Mike P (US 9.5): The Torrents are a bit lighter, and for me more suited to the moderate range of the trail spectrum. They have a similar wide-ish platform as the Peregrine, but they are less protective, especially at the forefoot. Torrents do have a bit more cush in the heel for long descents though. If the terrain is really rocky, the Peregrines would be a better pick in general. Anything leaning shorter, faster, and moderate - the Torrents would work better. For me the Peregrines also have a much better and secure fit. The Torrent upper feels boxy to me, and difficult to lock the foot in. But those fit distinctions may be subjective.

Renee is a former U. S. Marine journalist, which is when her enjoyment of running and writing started. She isn’t that awesome of a runner, but she tries really hard. Most of her weekly 50-60 miles take place on rural country roads in Nebraska, meaning mud, gravel, dirt, hills, and the occasional field. She has PR’s of 1:30:59 for the half marathon and 3:26:45 for the marathon.

Jeff Valliere runs mostly on very steep technical terrain above Boulder often challenging well known local FKT's. 

John Tribbia (5' 6", 130lbs)  is a former sponsored mountain/trail runner who has run with La Sportiva, Brooks/Fleet Feet, Pearl Izumi, and Salomon. Even though he competes less frequently these days, you can still find John enjoying the daily grind of running on any surface, though his favorite terrain is 30-40% grade climbs. He has won races such as America's Uphill, Imogene Pass Run, and the US Skyrunner Vertical Kilometer Series; and he's held several FKTs on several iconic mountains in Boulder, Colorado and Salt Lake City, Utah. If you follow him on  Strava , you'll notice he runs at varying paces between 5 minutes/mile to 12 minutes/mile before the break of dawn almost every day.

Jacob is a runner and general endurance sports enthusiast. He runs a mix of roads and trails in the Portland, Maine area. He has been running every day for over 3.5 years and averages around 50 miles per week. Jacob races on road and trail at a variety of distances from 5k to 50k. He has a recent PR of 2:49 in the marathon. In addition to running, he does hiking, biking (mountain/gravel/road), and nordic skiing. He is 26 years old, 6 ft / 182 cm tall and 155 lbs / 70 kg. You can check out Jacob’s recent activities on Strava .

Mike Postaski Born and raised in New Jersey, recently moved to Boise, ID in 2019, mainly to have better and easier access to outdoor adventure.  I have no formal running training, have never run on a team at any level, and can count the times I've run on a track on one hand.  I actually grew up inline speed skating - both indoor short track as well as roads.  Picking up running in my early 30s, starting on roads, progressing to marathons (PR 2:40, Boise 2019), eventually I discovered trails. I love going fast and running all distances, but I especially love long mountain ultras.  My three 100 milers so far have all been in the 25k vert range. I also enjoy the challenge of looped/timed trail races, and even the backyard ultra format. I am definitely a gear junkie - I have gone through more running vests than I can remember, and my trail running shoe collection currently sits at 38 pairs (all tracked via spreadsheet)!  My wife does not appreciate this . 

Peregrine 12 is available now including at our partners below.

Tested  s amples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased through affiliate links  in this article . These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'

24 comments:

As always, thanks to all for the thorough review! I haven't ran in a Peregrine since the 4/5's (some of my all time favorites), owing to the fact that they changed the shoe too much in later iterations (6-9 should never have happened). The 10/11 seemed like a return to the roots of the shoe, but that weight was the deciding factor against (considering competition). You sold me on the 12, which will be my next purchase for sure!

Anon, you will NOT be disappointed!

Is outsole as bad wet rock as Cascadia? From https://www.believeintherun.com/brooks-cascadia-15-performance-review/ "had some slippage on wet river rock."

How does this compare to the HOKA Torrent 2 ? Thanks.

Anon, just about any shoe is going to slip on most wet river rock (I think BITR is in Baltimore, so rocks there more slimy than most). I have had no issues with wet traction with the Peregrine 12 or the Cascadias of late (14, 15 or 16). Unknown, Torrent 2 is lighter and maybe quicker on moderate trails, but the Peregrine 12 is much more competent on technical trails with better protection and traction.

Thank you for the great review. I would be much interested in a comparison with Scarpa Spin 2.0 On the paper, they look like for similar purpose. Cheers. Antoine.

I'll defer to John and Renee on this one, as I unfortunately missed out on the Spin 2.0.

Only option to buy is to order online. Need some sizing help! For reference, I wear a 10.5 in Asics Fuji Lite 2, Brooks Catamount. 11 in Adidas Terrex Speed Ultra. Since this will be a technical and shorter distance shoe (sub 20mi) I like to keep it with just enough space for the toes, but not too much to where I'm swimming in them. Thoughts? Much appreciated.

Hard to predict, but can maintain that they run true to size. What ever size you most often get, then go with that size.

Unknown- My thoughts will be added to the review shortly, but this is my comp to the Torrent 2- The Torrents are a bit lighter, and for me more suited to the moderate range of the trail spectrum. They have a similar wide-ish platform as the Peregrine, but they are less protective, especially at the forefoot. Torrents do have a bit more cush in the heel for long descents though. If the terrain is really rocky, the Peregrines would be a better pick in general. Anything leaning shorter, faster, and moderate - the Torrents would work better. For me the Peregrines also have a much better and secure fit. The Torrent upper feels boxy to me, and difficult to lock the foot in. But those fit distinctions may be subjective.

Anonymous - These are my sizes (all in US) in the shoes you mentioned - Fuji Lite 2 (10.0), Brooks Catamount (9.5), Terrex Speed Ultra (9.5), Peregrine 12 (9.5)

Does anyone know if a gore-tex version will be coming?

TT, that is a great question! I was actually wondering the same, as I would be very keen to review if so. I reviewed last year's Gore Peregrine 11 and still use it often, but incorporating all the updates of the Peregrine 12 with a Gore wrap would be a dream. I'll keep you posted.

Bonjour J'ai eu la 10 et la 11. J ai le pied très fin et j avais noté que la 11 était plus large que la 10 et me convenait moins. J aurais du prendre 1/2 pointure de moins. Quand est il de la 12 par rapport ? Il y a t il toujours cette double semelle qui part lorsque les pieds sont mouillés. Merci

Would you recommend the Peregrine 11s with the gore tex or the 12s without. Only problem I have is the 11s colorways are gross and the new 12s are clean.

Anonymous- I'm not a big fan of gore tex shoes myself. I'd always pick the much lighter standard version. In these case V12 also dropped a lot of weight from V11 on top of the GTX weight savings. I'd definitely go with the V12. It's really a lot of shoe and very versatile at the price point.

The 12 is a MUCH better shoe, but if I were running in really wet conditions, consistent deep snow, slush, slop, or if was just really cold, I would consider the 11 GTX to be a better pick for that day. I have not yet tested or seen a 12 GTX, but if so, that would be a clear favorite.

Are these comparable to the Brooks Cascadia 16? From your reviews, both shoes stand out as having the protection and traction for all mountain running, with enough lightweight-stack for medium to long distance. How do they both hold up in wet (UK) conditions? Thanks

The Xodus Ultra has been more recently reviewed and seems to be valued highly by the testing team. Is the main point of difference between them the distance and traction?

Anon- The Cascadia is definitely geared towards longer efforts. They are a bit heavier with more cushion and protection. The Peregrine 12's do have a lightweight, and responsive, although not-cushy feel. They're better for short to medium distance in rocky/technical terrain. Cascadia would be better on the medium to long end of the spectrum.

Fantastic, Mike, thanks for your thoughts. It sounds like the Cascadia is more like the Xodus ultra than the Peregrine then, for distance at least. Your comparisons suggest the Xodus Ultra is more fun but can it handle the off trail mountain stuff as well as the Cascadia and Peregrine?

Yes exactly - Cascadia and Xodus Ultra would be in the same comparison class. In terms of the off trail mountain stuff, I'd say it really would come down to distance/duration. Peregrine has an edge in agility and ground feel, and just a slight edge in traction. But if you're running long, you wouldn't be going as fast anyway and the Xodus Ultra's comfort advantages would become apparent. I just ran the XU's at Scout Mountain 50M and they were great, but if I were going out for say a 1-2 hour "blast" run in technical terrain, I'd grab the Peregrines.

Mike, fantastic insight. Thanks for taking the time. Hope you ran well and enjoyed your day out. Would the XU be more comparable to the new Pulsar Trail than the Ultra Glide? It seemed that the UltraGlide did a lot of what the XU does but before it’s time!

Yep it was a great day for me, one of my better races - felt steady, start to finish. Based on Sam's insights, I'd say the XU seems more comparable to the Pulsar Trail. I haven't tested it though to see if it performs as well. I've never run in the UltraGlide, it never seemed appealing to me. Seems more like a long distance cruiser for moderate terrain. The XU has better technical chops for sure and is also really smooth in moderate terrain too.

Post a Comment

• Nutrition & Training
• Shoe Finder

• Daily Trainers
• Max Cushion
• Non-Technical
• Long Distance
• New Balance

Anatomy of a Shoe

Here’s how we break down the shoe in every review.

• Performance
• Accessories

Bipped Up Cap

We use cookies to provide the best experience on our website. Read our Cookie Policy .

Saucony Peregrine 12: Trail Running for the People

What You Need To Know

• Weighs 9.7 oz. (274 g.) for a US M10 / 8.5 oz. (240 g.) for a US W8.5
• Most of Saucony’s changes are in the revamped upper
• The 5mm PWRTRAC lugs are as grippy as ever
• Available now for $130

TAYLOR: Trail running gear has been around long enough that we have been starting to designate some marquis pieces. Think of brands like Montrail and shoes like the Cascadia — straight-up classics!

It is really in the following generation where the sport took off and so did the equipment to go with it. Somewhere in that space and time, Saucony launched the Peregrine line. It has been one of the most recommended and sought-after trail shoes because it gives you what you think you want and need when you step into the trail world. Great grip, foot protection, and a secure fit are all key characteristics.

With an ever-evolving scene, the Peregrine has maintained a lot of what it’s known for and, I would dare to say, that the 12 has been its most significant update yet. The Peregrine, which once was ahead of the game, is now trying to get back to that spot with a “simplification.” Saucony has slimmed this thing down and built it up all at the same time, and I’m here for it.

MATT: On the trail running scene, there are not many shoes that have the longevity from model to model as the Saucony Peregrine. On par with consistent favorites like the Hoka Speedgoat and the Altra Lone Peak , the Peregrine has now reached 12 installments. To last that long, you have to be doing something right, and historically the Peregrine has fit the mold as a solid and steady all-arounder that gets the job done and is modestly priced.

I enjoyed the Peregrine 11 and was excited to check out the improvements rolled out with this latest edition. Saucony looked to balance that fine line of providing continuous improvement without disrupting the things that work and keeping people choosing the Peregrine.

ALEX: The Saucony Peregrine is a classic. The improvements over the years keep this one on the top of the list as a go-to option for the trail runner looking to log long miles on varied terrain. I’ve logged miles in earlier versions and especially love the Peregrine ICE, so I was super pumped to get into these. The two major updates that I noticed in the Peregrine 12 were: 1) the significant drop in weight — over an ounce lighter than the 11 and 2) the completely redone breathable, stretchy upper.

ROBBE:  As classic as this shoe is, this is actually the first time I’ve ever stepped into a pair of the Peregrine. It’s one of those shoes that’s up there with the Brooks Caldera in terms of legacy and ease-of-use, in that it usually accommodates anyone trying to get some extra traction on trails. And I always appreciate a light trail shoe, so I was excited to see what this version was all about. Let’s go.

TAYLOR: The big (or not so big) story of the Peregrine 12 is that this iteration is more than an ounce lighter than the last model. It didn’t lose any stack, underfoot protection, or grip. How is that possible?! At 10.4 ounces for a men’s 10.5, this is making its way toward the “lightweight” category where it has always belonged. The shoe has always looked light and fast. Now, it is.

So, how did this magic trim work? It’s just a simpler shoe in a lot of ways. It utilizes a softer, lighter, more forgiving mesh upper for starters, and many of the overlays were left out. I do not think the trade for welded overlays will hurt the Peregrine’s durability too much. The mesh hugs nicely from the toe to heel and has that “next-to-skin” comfort. It’s a slim and sleek design with not much fluff. And let’s face it, the Gold/Vizi Red colorway is a bombshell. Gimme’ more of that!

One aspect I have wanted more of from the Peregrine in the past was more lockdown. There has always seemed to be a slip here or there, but this one has incredible lockdown throughout the foot. It definitely has a slim profile. It also just feels like it is shaped a little better. A firm heel cup, padded hell, and higher “elf heel” need to have some credit too. More on all of this later.

Underfoot, a few things are working in the runner’s favor. Now, I haven’t run in the Peregrine since the 10, and the midsole name hasn’t changed. I am convinced that Saucony has tooled it to give PWRRUN a lot more character. It is still medium density and has the same stack (26.5mm to 22.5 mm / 4mm drop). There’s a little bit of rebounded cush, a little bit of responsiveness, and a little bit of protection — which is also thanks to a thin forefoot rock plate. The Peregrine 12 has some of everything but not a lot in either department. Another piece of this equation is that a PWRRUN+ sock liner is added to give a little extra cushion for each step. I felt this big time compared to past iterations! The combo of the sock liner and midsole immediately gives this shoe more range of terrain and distance. It’s not my first choice for a long day in the mountains, but it can certainly handle a couple of hours on most any terrain with ease.

Grip has always been a staple with this shoe. I mean, it is named after a falcon. The PWRTRAC outsole did get an update with a new lug pattern. There is no compromise in grip, though. The 5mm chevron lugs are multidirectional, and the rubber compound is outstanding on a wide range of surfaces. The lugs shed dirt, mud, and snow relatively easily this time around.

A couple of other minor features are a gaiter attachment. I could see myself using these in chossy terrain with a gaiter thrown on. Also, a lace “garage” strap runs over the top of the midfoot and holds laces securely on every run.

Overall, the Peregrine is a pretty solid mix that would fit somewhere between a Brooks Catamount and Merrell MTL Skyfire.

MATT: In discussing improvements, let’s start with a couple of the biggest, which go hand in hand — the upper construction and the weight. The Saucony Peregrine 12 drops over an ounce from the 11, which wasn’t a super heavy shoe to begin with. My size 10 came in a tad under 10 oz., and they feel light and nimble on foot.

The upper is where repeat customers will notice the most significant change. It’s stripped down to a much more minimal construction with redesigned pliable overlays to lend support where necessary. There is also a sock-liner insert that provides a comfortable and secure fit. The sock-liner contains PWRRUN+ cushioning to provide added comfort.

The shoe feels faster than previous versions. I’m not sure if that is from the weight trimming, the PWRRUN+ liner, or the addition of the newly redesigned rock plate, but it’s likely the synergy of all of the above. While testing in the cold of winter, I actually think the redesigned upper will function well in warm temps. It seems to breathe really well and shed moisture.

The PWRRUN Midsole and PWRTRAC outsole are carryovers from the Peregrine 11, so not much has changed here. However, the 5mm lugs are arranged differently with the newest version, focusing on more efficient shedding of debris.

I have found the PWRTRAC outsole to be very effective all-around. It is grippy across various terrain and, combined with the 5mm lugs, provides a secure plant in the ground. I also booted a few rocks and roots on my last run, and the added protection in the toe area is solid and kept me from absorbing any damage.

The overall ride feels smooth, turnover feels fast, and you feel secure going fast regardless of trail conditions.

ALEX: I was pretty distracted by “The Bad,” but before I get into that, I will take some time on the redeeming qualities of the shoe.

First, the shoe looks great. The new colorways are vibrant and fresh, reminiscent of a box of tropical Mike and Ikes. As previously stated, it is also very light. A women’s 8.5 weighs just over 8.5 oz.

The upper is lightweight and highly breathable — these are going to keep your feet cool and drain well in the summer months. For winter runs, your feet are going to be cold. With any luck, the shipping and distribution issues will persist, and you won’t have to make that choice. The upper is also armed with well-placed overlays, including a welded toe bumper that is super protective from roots and rocks. The rock plate and dense PWRRUN midsole will offer ample protection, and the lower stack height means you still get some ground feel.

The aggressive PWRTRAC outsole is equipped with 5mm lugs that are well oriented for great traction and grip in pretty much any conditions and terrain. I am also a fan of the minimal tongue and secure lacing system.

ROBBE:  What I really appreciate about this shoe is that it seems like it’ll just work for a majority of runners, especially those new to the trail. Like, if someone asks me, “which trail shoe should I get?” I’d probably just tell them to get this. There certainly isn’t anything super special about it unless you count the 10-ounce weight in a package capable of handling most surfaces. Now that I think about it, I guess that is kind of special.

It’s hard to say exactly how I ran since my experience in the shoe was a 12-mile technical trail run in 12-degree weather. As anyone knows, EVA firms up real good in those temps, so the ride itself felt pretty firm. But in average temps, PWRRUN provides a pretty nice overall ride, standard in what you’d find in an everyday daily trainer. I actually enjoyed the somewhat narrow feel of this shoe and liked how it performed on the trails. The 5 mm lugs give it some teeth, and the light weight makes it nimble when picking around rocks and roots.

The traction on the Peregrine 12 was pretty solid. I felt secure on the surfaces I encountered, ranging from roots to wet rocks to rocky trails. It’s funny because I’ve tried shoes like the Saucony Canyon TR in the past with PWRTRAC, and it absolutely blows, so much so that I still think the Canyon TR is one of the worst trail shoes ever made aside from the total recall of the Endorphin Trail.

This shoe will be a lot more fun in the summertime as the midsole will soften up, and your toes will feel great in the airy mesh upper.

TAYLOR: I’ve mentioned it already, but this shoe is slim and trim. Though security is top-notch, comfort doesn’t exactly follow suit. I have a reasonably average foot width, and most shoe shapes don’t bother me. I fell prey to the Peregrine yet again. The midfoot is just too slim. I do not feel it after initially slipping them on, but after 30-45 minutes, I can feel that forefoot constriction. It’s important to know that I have a flared joint (aka bunion) on one foot. However, both feet felt the tightness. I would say that this time around, it was not as severe because of the more minimal overlays. It is a bummer, though, because I want to put more time into this shoe. I’m just not sure it is worth paying for it over the next day or so. The crunchy forefoot reminded me of shoes like the Nike Wildhorse or the VJ Spark .

Another discomfort comes from the opposite side of the shoe. A really firm heel cup serves well in the security department but comes up short in comfort too. It rubs consistently on my heel. Over an hour run, it’s not a huge deal. When I went further, it became a much more noticeable discomfort.

MATT: I’ve had the pleasure of testing the new Peregrine in some downright freezing conditions here in Maryland the past few weeks. I bring this up because it exposes a few flaws in the shoe that may not be an issue in warmer weather.

First off, the PWRRUN midsole really hardens up in these cold temps, making the ride pretty harsh. The ground feel was tough to judge fairly with the midsole feeling very brick-like. I think the review would be more positive if tested in the spring.

The new upper is quite thin, which I like and think will pay dividends in the summer months, but if you wear these in cold temps, you may want to ensure you pair with a thicker/warmer pair of socks.

One last thing is that after just a few runs, I noticed some staining of the upper material in the thin sections. It seemed that the combination of black socks and the light orange material caused some color to “bleed.” I have seen this before with brand new socks, but that was not the case here, so just something to be aware of.

ALEX (THE BAD): So you know the athletes on your Strava feed who consistently post those 9.99 or 19.99 or whatever.99 mile runs? Like just shuffle out the extra .01 miles, amirite?! (Lookin’ at you, Ben Johnson). Well, let it be known that the Saucony Peregrine 12 turned me into one of those runners because my Achilles demanded that when I got within eyesight of my front door, the run had to end.

The changes to the upper made this one feel way too small. The midfoot wrap felt too snug and made the shoe feel very narrow. I also noticed that my toes found the front of the narrow toe box even on a minor descent.

ALEX (THE WORST): The rigid heel cup and collar curved in at just the right amount and angle to put pressure on my Achilles and make it quite angry. That thing typically gets really fat (aka swollen and overused) in the late summer and fall months and retreats to hibernation in the winter. Waking it up before spring is never good.

ROBBE:  Apparently, Alex’s Achilles saw her shadow, which means spring is around the corner. Good for us, not for her Achilles. I didn’t have any issues with the Achilles, nor did I really have any problem with the fit. I mean, honestly, I didn’t really hate anything about this shoe, but I also didn’t love anything about it. Now again, I was running in 12-degree cold — I mean, our damn cold brew was freezing right after we poured it when we tried to trailgate post-run.

I would definitely save these for the warmer months, there’s just not enough there to keep your feet warm, and the PWRRUN just turns into a brick in those super cold temps.

Saucony Peregrine 12 Conclusion

TAYLOR: Just like Thor losing power to his hammer momentarily, this shoe has fallen short of living up to its name for a short while. The new Peregrine 12 can rightfully take its name back as it very much does mimic its namesake bird of prey. This shoe is light, fast, and nimble — which does come with a price in this case. This year’s update also makes the package a lot more versatile by slimming in some areas and adding some comfort and performance measures.

I would definitely grab for this shoe on shorter (2 hours or under) runs on a wide variety of terrain. Whether you want to tag a peak or roll along on some muddy singletrack, the Peregrine 12 could be a solid option for a lot of people (with slimmish feet).

MATT: I think Saucony did a really good job of applying improvements to a classic model without disrupting the things that have made the Peregrine popular in the first place. The new upper is a winner in my book, and when combined with the tried and true PWRUN midsole and PWRTRAC outsole, you have a really solid all-around trail shoe.

I would be mindful of the impact that cold temps will have on the quality of the ride, but if you live in a warmer climate or can rotate these in during milder temperatures, that would be my recommendation.

The Peregrine is a really solid choice for someone starting out on trails or that person who doesn’t want to break the bank but still wants a trustworthy and reliable shoe that they can trust on singletrack, fire roads, gravel, and anything between.

ALEX: Even though my fellow Peregrine 12 reviewers had no issues with sizing, you might want to go for a test run in them before you commit to your standard size. I can’t say I would have had the same experience if I had sized up, although, given my affinity for roomy, wide, foot-shaped shoes, this isn’t going to turn into a go-to for me. My grumpy Achilles tendon and metatarsalgia-prone feet made me put that in writing.

ROBBE:  Well, it’s been one of those reviews with differing opinions. And while I don’t love this shoe, I think this is a great shoe for someone looking to get into trail running who doesn’t want to break the bank. Or somebody who wants a shoe that you can take out for 3-6 miles in the warmer months and have some fun in. The Capri Sun colorways help as well. Get juiced, y’all.

You can pick up the Saucony Peregrine 12 for $130 on January 25 at Running Warehouse (featuring free 2-day shipping and 90-day returns) by using the shop link below.

Want to learn more about how our review process works? Check out this guide .

Have something to say? Leave a Comment

Is there anywhere to get an equivalent to the PWRRUN+ sock liner/insole?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Previous Post

Inov-8 X-Talon Ultra 260 V2 Review: Built For The Worst Conditions

Topo Athletic Trailventure WP 2 Performance Review

Related posts.

Dynafit Ultra DNA Review: Mont Blanc or Bust

Hoka Speedgoat 6 Review: Must We Demote The Goat?

VJ Lightspeed Review: I’m Proud of You, Cowboy

Inov-8 Trailfly Speed Review: Lean, Mean Technical Trail Machine

Best Asics Running Shoes Right Now

Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 Matryx Review: Voltron Levels Up

HQ 1805 Eastern Ave Baltimore, MD 21231

Weekly community runs from the @believeintherun HQ. Every Thursday at 6:30 PM. More About Believe Run Club

• How Our Reviews Work
• Job Opportunities

• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions
• Cookie Policy

2018 Primetime Emmy & James Beard Award Winner

R&K Insider

Join our newsletter to get exclusives on where our correspondents travel, what they eat, where they stay. Free to sign up.

A History of Moscow in 13 Dishes

Featured city guides.

Destination guides

Download free Russia travel guides

• St Petersburg
• Golden Ring
• Lake Baikal
• Murmansk (Kola Peninsula)
• Moscow & St Petersburg
• Russia River Cruises
• Expedition Cruises
• Trans-Siberian Tours
• Northern Lights Tours
• Siberia Tours
• Winter Tours
• Students Trips
• Luxury Tours
• Plan My Tour

Start planning my tour

Your Russia, your dates, your mates

• Destination Guides
• Russia Travel Tips
• Russian Visa
• Travel Insurance
• Why 56th Parallel
• Traveller Reviews

Moscow Vibes – Three Day City Escape

Duration 3 days

Price from USD $730 ? Currency Conversion Converted from USD based on the latest exchange rate. Final amount and payment will be in USD. Final conversion rate is determined by your bank.

Trip Style Sightseeing

Time of year All Year

Home / Moscow Tours / Moscow Vibes – Three Day City Escape

• Dates & Prices

This short Moscow tour will give you a true taste of the history, culture and incomparable urban vibe that define one of the world’s largest metropolises. In just three days, this Moscow itinerary takes in all the most iconic sights of this attraction-packed destination. After two and half days getting acquainted with the city, we’ve set time aside for you to explore Moscow your way and discover your own favourite hang-outs in a city overflowing with hidden treasures

3-Day Moscow Tour Highlights:

• Panoramic Tour of Moscow: See Moscow beyond the postcard images on a private excursion by car through the city streets including a drive along the banks of the Moskva River. Visit the famous Bolshoi Theatre, pass by Gorky Park and the Novodevichy Convent, and admire the city from on high at the Sparrow Hill observation platform.
• Moscow Historical City Centre Guided Walking Tour : Immerse yourself in the atmosphere of one of the world’s biggest metropolises and discover local haunts on foot, including the Red Square, the Kremlin and the multi-coloured domes of St Basil’s Cathedral.
• Armory Chamber tour: Explore the endless treasures of this unique museum, displaying the wealth accumulated by Russian rulers from the 12th century until the October Revolution of 1917. Walking through the exhibition halls is a journey through the centuries.
• Moscow Metro Tour : Go deep underground on a subway tour of the famous Moscow metro. The world’s deepest metro system is renowned for its palatial, art-adorned stations, complete with marble columns and chandeliers.

On your first day, you’ll be treated to a panoramic, drive-by tour of Moscow to get a feel for the immense scale of one of the world’s most rapidly developing urban centres. The city’s history unfolds in real-time as you pass lavish imperial mansions, solemn Soviet structures and luxurious modern shopping centres.

Day two kicks off exploring Moscow’s historic centre on foot, followed by a tour of the Kremlin, the seat of Russian power and political intrigue for centuries. Stand in the Red Square, surrounded by the stunning architecture as you hear stories of the people and events behind many of Moscow’s most iconic landmarks.

On your final day, we’ll head beneath the city for a tour of the Moscow Metro and its famously ornate underground stations. Art lovers should hit up one of Moscow’s many world-class galleries such as the Tretyakov State Gallery, the Pushkin Museum or Garage, Moscow’s cutting-edge contemporary art museum. History fans can follow a Soviet trail through the city including Stalin’s Bunker, while those seeking a more indulgent experience can browse trendy neighbourhoods like Kitay Gorod or shop for everything from fashion to kitsch souvenirs at the enchanting Izmaylovo Flea Market. Foodies can head to one of the countless speciality stores sampling vodka, caviar and chocolate.

If you only have a few days to spend in Moscow, this tour will ensure you make the most of your time in the city. Let the experts navigate you through this complex and occasionally overwhelming capital, giving you plenty of time to soak up the city’s most unmissable attractions.

Accomodation

Not Included

Sightseeing

Action rating ?

Type of tour

3 days / 2 nights

Private - Any Date

Day 1 Panoramic city tour

Welcome to the glorious capital of Russia, Moscow! You’ll be met by your driver at the airport and taken to your centrally located hotel.

After check-in and rest, meet your private guide at the hotel lobby for a comprehensive tour of Moscow by car. Visit the starkly contrasting Theatre Square to see the stunning Bolshoi Theatre, pass Tverskaya Street, the city’s main boulevard and home to the landmark Yeleseyevskiy Grocery Store.

You’ll enjoy a panoramic drive along the Moskva River, where a huge, controversial state of Peter the Great was erected. Pass by the legendary Gorky Park and the White House before a stop at the architecturally stunning Novodevichy Convent, and the observation platform at Sparrow Hills, for a bird’s eye view over this staggering megalopolis.

Day 2 Red Square and Kremlin

After breakfast at the hotel, your guide will take you on a walking tour of the historical city centre. Stroll through the Red Square, the hub of cultural life in Moscow, with its elaborate ‘stone flower’ fountain and fantasy-like St Basil’s Cathedral – a postcard-perfect symbol of the nation. Admire the grandiose façade of GUM, the city’s most luxurious shopping centre, and visit Alexander’s Garden, with its eternal flame and the chance to watch a changing of the guards.

Break for lunch before continuing on a tour of the Kremlin and Armoury Chamber, famous of its collection of tsarist fashion, with regalia such as jewel-encrusted crowns, orbs and sceptres as well as arms and armour, exotic gifts from the leaders of faraway lands, and an illustrious case of Imperial Faberge eggs.

As an option* spend an evening on a sumptuous dinner cruise, taking in the stunning sights and city lights of this mesmerising metropolis by night.

Day 3 Metro and Arbat Street

Start a day with a tour of Metro, stopping on the way to marvel at some of the most elaborately decorated stations of the world-famous Moscow subway system. Take a stroll along Old Arbat street - the most famous street in Moscow. Through the centuries Arbat used to be one of the most bohemian places in Moscow. Today Arbat is a promenade full of small cozy cafes and street life.

The afternoon is free for you to either enjoy the rest of the day on your own or choose among optional excursions to explore more of Moscow. Visit the Tretyakov Gallery or Pushkin State Museum to admire Russian art. Join locals for a stroll at the Gorky or VDNH park.

Visit beautiful Kolomeskoye Estate or Izmailovo Kremlin, or spend a day exploring the beautiful city of the Golden Ring (Russian province) - Sergiev Posad. In the evening you will be transferred to the airport for your departure to your next destination.

Print this page

Save a printed version of this tour, so you can make a decision later

Send to my inbox

Email yourself or a friend the link for this tour

Ask a question

Have a question about this tour? Our experts will be happy to help

Group airport/train-station arrival and departure transfers

All transportation according to the itinerary with a private driver

4* hotel accommodation in the historical city center (twin/double)

Local licensed English-speaking guide

All activities, indicated in the itinerary, except optional

Entry fees according to the itinerary (skip-the-lines policy)

Russian visa support document

Travel insurance

Russian visa and visa fees. Russian visa can be arranged by 56th Parallel for an additional cost (for Australian citizens only). Apply for concierge visa service here .

Optional excursions/activities

*Private tour. Price is per person, based on min 2 people

Similar tours

Highlights of moscow & st petersburg.

Immerse yourself in the art, history and culture of Russia and explore the contrasting styles of Moscow and St Petersburg in just one week. Experience the iconic landmarks of ...

Golden Ring at a Glance

Take a short detour from Moscow to discover the age-old allure of Russia. Travelling from the capital to the countryside, where golden spires and the onion-shaped domes of ...

Treasures of St Petersburg

This in-depth tour is a fun and fascinating discovery of the legacy of Imperialist Russia, just in one week. A showcase for the wealth and tastes of the Emperors of Russia from ...

Classic Moscow – Art, History and Culture

Breathe in the history of Moscow, explore its Imperial and soviet past, dynamic contemporary culture and lifestyle. On this 5-day tour of Moscow, you'll visit the must-see sights ...

Why travel to Russia with 56th Parallel?

Destination Specialists

Our team offers over 18 years of experience travelling and planning travel in Russia. Delivering outstanding travel experiences in Russia’s capitals and in some of the most stunning & remote locations takes experience, special access and the right connections. We make sure that all the fine details are handled perfectly so you can enjoy your Russia travel experience.

Group & Private Tours

The choice to join a small group on a guaranteed departure or chose to travel on your own dates with your own mates. Each destination we travel to in Russia offers an option between private tours and small group tours. Please note: on our adventure tours in remote destinations, we mostly run group tours to keep the cost down.

Bonded & Licensed

56th Parallel is a fully licensed, insured and accredited travel provider.

From USD $730

Day 1: Panoramic city tour

Day 2: red square and kremlin, day 3: metro and arbat street, not included, start planning your tour.

A destination specialist will follow up on you enquiry shortly. Prefer to chat? Call us on +61 412 587 785 we will be delighted to be of service.

Email this tour to:

Have a question or need specific information.

Send us a note below or call us

Country * Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegowina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia (Hrvatska) Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France France Metropolitan French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard and Mc Donald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao, People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka St. Helena St. Pierre and Miquelon Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Yugoslavia Zambia Zimbabwe

If you have any urgent questions or enquiries, please give us a call +61 412 587 785

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser .

• Moscow Tours

Our 20 Best Moscow Tours of 2022

Join us on an unforgettable tour to Moscow, the capital of Russia. Imagine visiting Red Square, St. Basil’s the Kremlin and more. Moscow is one of Europe’s most vibrant cities and one of Russia’s most historical. All of our tours to Moscow are fully customizable and can be adjusted to fit any budget. Our most popular tours are listed below. Please click on the tour details to learn more or contact us for more information about our Moscow tours using the form at the side of the page. You can also schedule a call with one of our Russian travel specialists to learn more.

Classic Moscow

This is our most popular Moscow tour that includes all the most prominent sights. You will become acquainted with ancient Russia in the Kremlin, admire Russian art in the Tretyakov Gallery, listen to street musicians as you stroll along the Old Arbat street, and learn about Soviet times on the Moscow Metro tour.

Accommodation

PRIVATE TOUR

A Week in Moscow

This tour is a perfect choice for those who wish to get to know Moscow in depth. One of the highlights of this package is the KGB history tour which gives an interesting perspective on the Cold War. You will also have time for exploring the city on your own or doing extra sightseeing.

Weekend in Moscow

This tour is a great way to get acquainted with the capital of Russia if you are short of time. You will see all the main attractions of the city, the most important of which is the Kremlin - the heart of Russia. The tour starts on Friday and can be combined with a business trip.

Group Tour Moscow Break by Intourist

Russia's capital has so much to offer, from the Kremlin and the Metro to the Old Arbat street and the Tretyakov Gallery. Besides these sites, you will also visit a fascinating country estate which today is quite off the beaten path, Gorky Estate, where the Soviet leader Lenin spent the last months of his life.

Kolomenskoye Tour with transport

The history of Kolomenskoye stretches back for centuries. In 1380, Dmitri Donskoi’s army passed through Kolomenskoye on their way to the Kulikovo battlefield, and it was...

Tours by car

Kremlin, Red Sq., Cathedrals & Armory Tour

The Kremlin is truly a fascinating structure, at the same time it is an ancient tower, the city’s former military fortification, a palace, an armory, the sovereign treasury...

Walking tours

Kremlin, Red Sq., Cathedrals, Armory, Diamond Fund Tour

Old Arbat walking tour

You will be told of the street’s interesting history and view the street’s artisan culture. You will also have the opportunity to view and purchase souvenirs from the...

Tour to Sergiev Posad with transport

Considered by some to be the Russian Vatican, Sergiev Posad is the temporary residence of the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church. The Trinity St. Sergius Monastery (Lavra)...

Tour to Kuskovo with transport

The Kuskovo Estate often called the Moscow Versailles due to its perfectly preserved French park, is an example of an 18th century, luxurious Moscow summer residence. Its history...

Tour to Tsaritsyno with transport

The Tsaritsyno Estate is located in the southern part of Moscow. The estate was constructed for Catherine the Great by the Russian architects Bazhenov and Kazakov in a romantic...

Moscow Metro and Old Arbat Tour

The Moscow Metro is one of the largest and most grandly built metro systems in the world. It was meant to be a showcase of the Soviet Union’s achievements for both the Russians...

Vodka Museum Tour with transport (excursion and vodka tasting)

Vodka is an important component of Russian life, an element of national identity and everyday culture. We invite you to visit the Vodka Museum and feel the atmosphere of long-gone...

Mikhail Bulgakov Apartment Museum

This apartment museum located close to Patriarch Ponds became the prototype of the "bad apartment" described in the novel "The Master and Margarita." Currently the museum's...

Kremlin, Red Sq., Cathedrals & Diamond Fund Tour

The State Museum of Lev Tolstoy Tour

Take this opportunity to learn more about the Russian writer Lev Tolstoy. During the visit to the museum you will see part of a vast collection of exhibits connected to Tolstoy...

Novodevichy Convent Tour with transport

Tour of the Novodevichy Monastery. Founded in 1524 by Grand Prince VasiliIoanovich, the original convent was enclosed by fortified walls and contained 12 towers. The structure...

City Tour with Visit to St. Basils & Red Sq. with transport

Panoramic City Tour. This Moscow tour is a great start to your trip and the best way to get acquainted with many of the city’s major highlights. Our professional guide will...

City Tour of Moscow

Head to the heart of Moscow with a professional guide on a 4-hour private walk through the city center. See Tverskaya and Old Arbat streets, Theatre Square with the world-famous...

Moscow Metro walking tour

Kremlin, Red Square and Cathedrals Tour

KGB Tour with transport

This is a very interesting and insightful tour. You will visit places connected with Stalin’s terror - a time of great repression and fear. You will be shown monuments to...

Soviet and Post-Soviet Moscow Tour

The tour begins with a drive or walk down Tverskaya Street – a Soviet masterpiece. In the years of Soviet power, Tverskaya began to undergo a transformation: it was widened...

Tretyakov State Gallery Tour

This world-famous gallery contains masterpieces of Russian art beginning in the 10th century up until today. You will view exquisite Russian icons and paintings from the 18th and...

Jewish Heritage of Moscow Tour

This tour offers a detailed look into the history and present-day life of the Jewish community of Moscow. On the tour, you will visit sites connected with the cultural and religious...

Vodka Museum Tour with transport (excursion only)

Lena, our guide in Moscow was excellent. She was very knowledgable and could answer any question we had for her. We liked that she could pick up on our interests and take us places we might not have thought of to go. When we realized that one of the places we had chosen to see would probably not be that interesting to us, she was able to arrange entry to the Diamond Fund and the Armoury for us. Riding the Metro with Lena was a real adventure and a lot of fun. In Saint Petersburg we found Anna well versed in the history of the Tsars and in the Hermitage collection. Arkady in Veliky Novgorod was a very good guide and answered all of our questions with ease. Novgorod was perhaps a long way to go for a day trip, but we did enjoy it. Vasily was a great driver to have and kept us safe with good humour and skill. We enjoyed ourselves so much, my daughter says she is already planning to return. We would both have no hesistation to recommend ExpresstoRussia to anyone we know.

Just wanted to let you know that My grandson Bruno and I couldn´t have been more pleased with our week in Moscow (6/15 - 6/21). We were absolutely enchanted with the whole experience, including getting lost a couple of times in the Metro during our free time. Although both our guides (both Eleanas) were excellent, I would particularly commend the first one (she took us to the Tatiakov, the KGB tour, and to that beautiful cemetery where so many great Russian artists, authors, composers, musicians, militarists, and politicians are buried). Her knowledge is encyclopedic; and her understanding of today´s Russia as a product of its past was, for us, truly enlightening. I will be taking another tour in Russia, with my wife, within the next two or three years. I will be in touch with you when the time comes. Meanwhile, I will refer you to other potential visitors to Russia as I meet them.

Tours to Moscow

Our Moscow tours are land only meaning that you arrange your own air travel to Russia and our expert staff meets you at the airport and handles everything else from there. Our online Airline Ticket booking system offers some of the most competitive rates to Russia available on the web so if you need tickets, please visit our Russian air ticket center . Rest assured that you will be taken great care of on one of our Moscow tours. Express to Russia has a fully staffed office in Moscow that will help to make your visit fun, informative and unforgettable. Please remember that of all these tours are private and can be adjusted to your taste. You can add, replace or skip some sights; you can add more days to the package or cut the tour short. Our specialists will be glad to help you create the tour of your dreams!

Moscow, a City Like No Other

Moscow is Russia’s largest city with a population of between 12 and 13 million. It is also Europe’s largest city and when you visit Moscow, you can feel it. The layout and architecture of the city is eclectic, ranging from crooked, ancient streets and alleyways to wide, bustling boulevards, from medieval churches to Stalin skyscrapers and to modern, glass buildings towering over everything and of course in the center of it all is the Kremlin and the magnificent Red Square. Moscow is also home to a fantastic, efficient and very beautiful metro system – each station having its own special design. In fact, Express to Russia’s Moscow metro tours and excursions are some of our most popular attractions that we offer. On our Moscow tours, you will see this and more.

Moscow Tours centering on Russian History

Moscow has a long and interesting history and has been the capital of Russia in many of its different iterations – capital of the Grand Duchy of Moscow , the Russian Empire and of course the Soviet Union (who could ever forget the Soviet Union?). Moscow, was founded in the 12th century by Prince Yuri Dolgaruki (Yuri of the long arms – he really did have long arms!). From that time on, it was home to the Russian Tsars until Peter the Great moved the capital to St. Petersburg in 1703. The city has survived invasions and sieges from the Mongols, the Tartars, the Poles, Lithuanians and Napoleon but has always persevered. Our Moscow tours will enlighten you on this great history and give you insights into Muscovites and their unique culture. Our Moscow tours show you what the city is like today but also brings to life the past. Moscow never seems to sleep and is bursting with energy. A Moscow tour with Express to Russia is truly the best way of getting to know Russia’s largest and most vibrant city.

Frequently Asked Questions From Our Travelers

What is the best time to visit moscow.

Any time of year is fine depending on what you plan to do. Summertime is pleasantly warm, ideal for exploring the city and its vibrant atmosphere, but Moscow will be much busier and accommodation is more expensive. Winter can be quite cold but beautiful nonetheless, and this is unproblematic if you intend to spend most of your trip in museums and galleries. There are also various festivals and events organised throughout the year. For more information about the best time to visit, read our guide

How many days are enough in Moscow?

If you plan your itinerary strategically and aren’t averse to a packed schedule, you can cover Moscow’s main sights over a long weekend. Most popular attractions are in the city centre, and the Moscow Metro allows you to cover much ground in a small amount of time. Ensure that your accommodation is fairly central and book tickets in advance, so that you can make the most of your days. For an informative and well-organised day out, check out our Moscow day tours with options to suit all interests.

Do they speak English in Moscow?

As Russia’s capital city, tourists are well accommodated in Moscow. There should be English-speaking staff in restaurants, bars, hotels, shops and attractions in tourist hotspots, and there are also English-speaking tourist police. Transport services have English translations on their maps and English announcements via intercom; alternatively, order taxis from the Yandex Taxi app (Russian Uber), though it’s unlikely that your taxi driver will speak English. If you get stuck and cannot communicate, it’s fine to use Google Translate.

Is it safe to travel to Moscow?

It is no less safe to travel to Moscow than to any European city if you exercise common sense and look after your belongings. As with every city some regions can be more unsavoury than others, but no tourist attractions are located there. The traffic in Moscow is notorious, so exercise caution when crossing roads. Do not take unlicensed taxis; book in advance or take public transport, which is widespread and perfectly safe. If you encounter any problems, look for the special tourist police who can help you. For more information, read our guide about staying safe in Russia .

Our travel brands include

Express to Russia

Join us on Facebook

We invite you to become a fan of our company on Facebook and read Russian news and travel stories. To become a fan, click here .

Join our own Russian Travel, Culture and Literature Club on Facebook. The club was created to be a place for everyone with an interest in Russia to get to know each other and share experiences, stories, pictures and advice. To join our club, please follow this link .

We use cookies to improve your experience on our Website, and to facilitate providing you with services available through our Website. To opt out of non-essential cookies, please click here . By continuing to use our Website, you accept our use of cookies, the terms of our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service . I agree

Free Shipping* & Free Returns

• ACCOUNT SIGN IN

Discover the perfect shoe in less than a minute with our shoe finder! Find your perfect fit

Did you mean?

Your recent searches, popular searches.

Click offer codes below to apply in checkout . Tap offer codes below to apply in checkout .

There are no promotions running at this time. There are no promotions running at this time.

Like being first?

Sign up to get the inside scoop on fresh releases, limited editions, and exclusive offers.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Get a $20 eGift card when you refer a friend to Saucony.com and they make a qualifying purchase. Your friend will receive a $20 promo code to use on their first purchase of $100+ at Saucony.com. Please read all terms and conditions. Not valid on Endorphin Collection, prior purchases or in Saucony outlet stores. Offer valid on US orders only. Some restrictions may apply.

Refer A Friend Give $20,

Your browser's Javascript functionality is turned off. Please turn it on so that you can experience the full capabilities of this site.

Excursion TR15

Recommended Products

Like being first.

Connect with us:

Visit saucony on facebook. Opens in new window.

Visit saucony on linkedin. Opens in new window.

Visit saucony on instagram. Opens in new window.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Saucony Privacy Policy

15% Off Your Next Purchase Over $75: Not valid on collaborations, prior purchases or in Saucony outlet stores. Valid only on Saucony.com. Exclusions may apply.

The original running brand

1898 is where it all began. Since then, Saucony has rightfully taken its place as one of the world's leading running companies. Built on a legacy of performance, Saucony continues to offer best-in-class running shoes, running apparel, and timeless retro footwear that has helped shape who we are today. The next great innovation has always been right at our fingertips—from speed shoes to trail running shoes and walking shoes to casual classics. Get exclusive access to new arrivals, top sellers, sales, extended sizes, and online-only offers.