solitary experiments tour 2024 deutschland

Um den vollen Funktionsumfang dieser Webseite nutzen zu können, benötigst du JavaScript. Bitte schalte JavaScript in deinem Browser ein.

• Meine Favoriten

Um mein neues Passwort zu erhalten, darf CTS EVENTIM AG & Co. KGaA meine E-Mail-Adresse verwenden.

EVENTIM legt großen Wert auf Datenschutz. Die Datenschutzinformation kannst du hier nachlesen.

• Persönliche Daten
• Meine Bestellungen
• Benachrichtigungen
• Zum Warenkorb

Solitary Experiments - The 30th Anniversary Celebration

• Suchtext löschen
• Leider keine Treffer gefunden. Bitte ändere deine Sucheingabe.
• Berlin (3) ausgewählt

Für folgende Events sind zurzeit leider keine Tickets verfügbar

Solitary experiments - the 30th anniversary celebration - tagesticket freitag.

• Kesselhaus in der Kulturbrauerei
• Ausverkauft

Solitary Experiments - The 30th Anniversary Celebration - Wochenendticket

Solitary experiments - the 30th anniversary celebration - tagesticket samstag, event-information, solitary experiments fan-report: bewertungen und rezensionen, 17 bewertungen (ø 4,8), konzert - solitary experiments.

Tolle Location - 4 Stunden mega Musik inkl. 2 Vor - Band's!!!!

Mega Konzert

Die Vorband Mental Exile und Vanguard heizten schon ordentlich ein. Solitary Experiments waren super drauf und hatten Lust zu Feiern. Es war ein grandioser Abend.

Daumen hoch

Wie so ziemlich jede Veranstaltung im Hell, absolut top!

Ähnliche Künstler

Empfehlungen für dich

• Solitary Experiments

Dein Browser lässt keine Cookies von Drittanbietern zu. Für den Ticketkauf ist die Speicherung von Cookies der CTS EVENTIM AG & Co. KGaA, dem Betreiber des Ticketshops jedoch notwendig. Die Datenschutzerklärung von EVENTIM kannst du hier einsehen. Bitte deaktiviere in deinen Browsereinstellungen das Blockieren der Cookies von Drittanbietern, um den Ticketshop auf dieser Website nutzen zu können; nach dem Ticketkauf kannst du das Blockieren der Cookies von Drittanbietern wieder aktivieren. Alternativ klickst du bitte auf unten stehenden Button, um die Ticketshop-Seite von EVENTIM in einem neuen Fenster zu öffnen.

Dein Browser verhindert die Speicherung von Cookies. Um eine Bestellung durchführen zu können, ändere bitte die Cookie-Einstellungen deines Browsers und lade diese Seite neu.

The 30th Anniversary Celebration

präsentiert von NEUWERK MUSIC & EPICENTRE BOOKING

Was 1994 in einem kleinen Homestudio in Frankfurt (Oder) begann, feiert jetzt – nach zahlreichen Veröffentlichungen, Charterfolgen und Konzerten in der ganzen Welt – sein 30-jähriges Jubiläum.

Solitary Experiments gehören mittlerweile zu den weltweit erfolgreichsten Acts des melodischen Electro und zeichnen sich immer wieder durch mitreißende Melodien, kraftvoll-tanzbaren Beats und dem unverwechselbaren harmonischen Gesang in ihren Songs aus.

Dieses ganz besondere Ereignis feiern SOLITARY EXPERIMENTS mit einem zweitägigen Festival zusammen mit sieben befreundeten Bands, plus Special Guests und Überraschungen – und natürlich mit EUCH!

Mit dabei sind NEUROTICFISH , SITD , CAT RAPES DOG , ABSURD MINDS , STERIL , ME THE TIGER und ZYNIC . SOLITARY EXPERIMENTS werden dabei an beiden Abenden jeweils ein unterschiedliches Fulltime Set mit allen Hits und vielen Raritäten spielen.

Diese Bandkonstellation verspricht einen Konzertabend voll feinster elektronischer Pop- und Clubmusik und ist ein MUSS für jeden Fan.

2 Tage, 2 Solitary Experiments Konzerte, 7 weitere Bands und ihr!!!

Kesselhaus in der Kulturbrauerei // Berlin Knaackstraße 97, 10435 Berlin

• 19. Juni 2024

Videoposting Steril

Videoposting absurd minds.

• 14. Juni 2024

Videoposting Zynic

• E-Mail an Solitary Experiments
• Datenschutz

Edition 6.12

MARKUS OTTO LEHNINER STR. 103B 14822 BORKWALDE (GERMANY) EMAIL: [email protected] MOBILE: + 49 152-53808360

Informationen

Solitary Experiments - The 30th Anniversary Celebration 2024

Bánffy Castle - Bonțida, Romania

Salzburgring - Plainfeld, Austria

Jera On Air - Ysselsteyn, Netherlands

Klein Strand - Ostend, Belgium

Glasgow Green - Glasgow, United Kingdom

O2 Victoria Warehouse Manchester - Stretford, United Kingdom

Priory Park - Southend-on-Sea, United Kingdom

Hyde Park - London, United Kingdom

Kulturbrauerei - Berlin, Germany

Nation of Gondwana - Berlin, Germany

Schokoladen - Berlin, Germany

Leffinge Leuren - Berlin, Germany

Humboldt Forum - Berlin, Germany

Raum Berlin - Berlin, Germany

Olympic Stadium and Olympic Park - Berlin, Germany

Sonic Pluriverse Festival - Berlin, Germany

TBA BERLIN - Berlin, Germany

Brandenburg Gate - Berlin, Germany

Platz der Republik - Berlin, Germany

Pumptrack Berlin - 52° e.V. - Berlin, Germany

Cassiopeia Sommergarten - Berlin, Germany

Privatclub - Berlin, Germany

Rathausplatz Sendenhorst - Hansaviertel, Germany

Festsaal Kreuzberg - Berlin, Germany

Stadtverwaltung Brandenburg an der Havel - Bürgerservice

Katapultgelaende

Strand Stöbnitz am Geiseltalsee Camp

Gedankenfabrik Bortfeld

Lippe Open Air

Norra Vallgatan 66

Freibad Verl

Bjerreds Station

Přírodní areál

Sejerø Harbour

Ulica Elektryków

Find a Place to Stay: Hotels & Rentals Near Solitary Experiments - The 30th Anniversary Celebration 2024

• Moscow concerts Moscow concerts Moscow concerts See all Moscow concerts ( Change location ) Today · Next 7 days · Next 30 days
• Most popular artists worldwide
• Trending artists worldwide

• Tourbox for artists

Search for events or artists

• Sign up Log in

• Get the app
• Moscow concerts
• Change location
• Popular Artists
• Live streams
• Deutsch Português
• Popular artists

Solitary Experiments

• On tour: yes
• Solitary Experiments is not playing near you. View all concerts
• Moscow, Russian Federation Change location

6,403 fans get concert alerts for this artist.

Join Songkick to track Solitary Experiments and get concert alerts when they play near you.

Nearest concert to you

The 30th Anniversary Celebration

Touring outside your city

Be the first to know when they tour near Moscow, Russian Federation

Join 6,403 fans getting concert alerts for this artist

Upcoming concerts (2)

Similar artists with upcoming concerts, posters (20).

Past concerts

MS RheinEnergie Konzertkahn

DARK STORM FESTIVAL

View all past concerts

Solitary Experiments tour dates and tickets 2024-2025 near you

Want to see Solitary Experiments in concert? Find information on all of Solitary Experiments’s upcoming concerts, tour dates and ticket information for 2024-2025.

Solitary Experiments is not due to play near your location currently - but they are scheduled to play 2 concerts across 1 country in 2024-2025. View all concerts.

Similar artists

• Most popular charts
• Campaigns for promoters
• API information
• Brand guidelines
• Community guidelines
• Terms of use
• Privacy policy
• Cookies settings
• Cookies policy

Get your tour dates seen everywhere.

Solitary Experiments

• Other Music News
• Live Music News
• Webzine News
• Artists A-E
• Artists F-J
• Artists K-O
• Artists P-T
• Artists U-Z
• Parties Germany
• Parties Europe
• Parties Rest of the World
• In my own Words
• Specials 2024
• Specials 2023
• Specials 2022
• Specials 2021
• Specials 2020
• Specials 2019
• Specials 2018
• Specials 2017
• Specials 2016
• Specials 2015
• Specials 2014
• Specials 2013
• Specials 2012
• Specials 2011
• Specials 2010
• Specials 2009
• Specials 2008
• Specials 2007
• Specials 2006
• Specials 2005
• Concert Photos
• Festival Photos
• Recruitment
• Promo Policy
• Imprint & Disclaimer

Latest Reviews & Interviews

• Gallery: Of Mice & Men - Esch sur Alzette 2024
• Live Review: Smashing Pumpkins, The - Monchengladbach 2024
• Live Review: Karnivool - Luxembourg City 2024
• Gallery: Gotthard - Markneukirchen 2024
• Live Review: Tool - Cologne 2024
• Live Review: Thirty Seconds to Mars - Cologne 2024
• Live Review: Gary Numan - London 2024
• Live Review: Rock im Park - Nuremberg 2024 (Day 3)
• Live Review: Rock im Park - Nuremberg 2024 (Day 2)
• Live Review: Rock im Park - Nuremberg 2024 (Day 1)
• Live Review: Dogstar - Esch sur Alzette 2024
• Gallery: Corey Taylor - Bochum 2024
• Gallery: Saltatio Mortis - Chemnitz 2024
• Live Review: 31st Wave Gotik Treffen - Leipzig 2024 (Day 3 & 2)
• Gallery: Laibach - Dresden 2024
• Live Review: 31st Wave Gotik Treffen - Leipzig 2024 (Day 1 & 2)
• Live Review: Metallica - Munich 2024 2
• Live Review: Metallica - Munich 2024
• Live Review: Fiddler’s Green - Berlin 2024
• Live Review: Laibach - Berlin 2024
• CD Review: Nemedian Chronicles - The Savage Sword
• Interview: Huir - May 2024
• Live Review: Go_A - Hamburg 2024
• Live Review: Onuka - Hamburg 2024
• Live Review: Maustetytöt - Hamburg 2024

Latest News

• HAUJOBB - Announce new album & release first single
• FORCED TO MODE - Tour Update 2024
• IN EXTREMO - Announce new studio album “Wolkenschieber” for September 6, 2024
• ZOOT WOMAN - Return with new album “MAXIDRAMA”
• MILA MAR - New Album “Songs from the other side” released
• WITHIN TEMPTATION - Release first video of the live album “Worlds Collide Tour, Live In Amsterdam”
• IN EXTREMO - Castle tour starts tomorrow & own festival on August 31st
• E-TROPOLIS FESTIVAL 2025 - Third band wave with MESH, AESTHETIC PERFECTION & TENSION CONTROL
• MAXÏMO PARK - New Album “Stream Of Life” in September
• DIARY OF DREAMS - “Under a timeless spell” new album with Leipzig Philharmonic
• LINKIN PARK - Greatest Hits album ‘Papercuts (Singles Collection 2000-2023)’ out now!
• E-TROPOLIS FESTIVAL 2025 - Solar Fake, Rotersand, Empathy Test & more bands confirmed!
• Hurricane and Southside 2024 - The line-ups are final
• ISAAC HOWLETT - Debut solo single by frontman of UK synth-pop act EMPATHY TEST out 28.02.2024 & tour March & April 2024
• APOCALYPTICA - Announces a new tribute to Metallica “Apocalyptica plays Metallica, vol. 2“
• EISBRECHER - Noel Pix leaves the Band
• THEN COMES SILENCE - Swedish post-punk trio to release ‘Ride or Die’ single.
• FOR I AM - To release brand-new Single "Power Behind The Throne"
• GARBAGE - Announces details for the expanded re-release of “Bleed Like Me” on April 5, 2024 via Stunvolume/BMG.
• THE CASSANDRA COMPLEX - Announces “Death & Sex” Album
• COMBICHRIST - Official music video “Planet Doom” on February 8th, 2024
• EINSTÜRZENDE NEUBAUTEN - New album “RAMPEN (apm: alien pop music)” on April 5, 2024 & Tour in the fall
• XMAL DEUTSCHLAND - New releases including “Early Singles 1981-1982”
• PLAGE NOIRE 2024 - Line-up complete!
• WAVE GOTIK TREFFEN 2024 - ANNEKE VAN GIERSBERGEN and more confirmed

CD Review: Solitary Experiments - Transcendent

• Out Of Line
• Solitary Experiments

See also (all categories):

• Live Review: Unter Schwarzer Flagge - Cologne 2024 - 28/04/2024 19:11
• Live Review: Dark Storm Festival - Chemnitz 2023 - 05/01/2024 12:02
• Live Review: Amphi Festival - Cologne 2023 (Day 2) - 06/08/2023 15:34
• Live Review: 30th Wave Gotik Treffen - Leipzig 2023 (Day 3) - 22/06/2023 10:53
• Preview EPICENTRE FESTIVAL 2023 - Bochum 2023-11-04 - 13/06/2023 16:03
• Live Review: Solitary Experiments - Frankfurt/ Main - 30/03/2023 09:57
• Live Review: Solitary Experiments - Leipzig 2022 - 21/11/2022 19:09
• Live Review: M’era Luna Festival - Hildesheim 2022 (Day 1) - 11/08/2022 20:00
• Live Review: E-Tropolis Festival - Oberhausen 2021 - 17/11/2021 14:11
• Live Review: Static Darkness - London 2019 (Day 2) - 17/11/2019 12:39
• Live Review: Bergfest - Thale 2019 - 07/08/2019 10:22
• Live Review: Amphi Festival - Cologne 2019 (Day 1) - 29/07/2019 11:07
• Gallery: Solitary Experiments - Oberhausen 2018 - 20/11/2018 11:15
• CD Review: Solitary Experiments - Future Tense - 26/09/2018 16:52
• Live Review: Wave Gotik Treffen - Leipzig 2018 (Day 3) - 29/05/2018 20:29
• Gallery: E-Werk Ost Festival - Dresden 2017 - 10/04/2017 14:22
• Live Review: E-Tropolis Festival - Oberhausen 2017 - 31/03/2017 09:33
• Special: Artists and their Tattoos - Frank Glassl (live-drums) from Solitary Experiments - 27/10/2016 11:46
• Live Review: Nocturnal Culture Night 11 - Deutzen 2016 (Day 1 warm-up & Day 2) - 14/09/2016 11:34
• Interview: Solitary Experiments - August 2016 - 08/08/2016 15:19
• Live Review: Amphi Festival - Cologne 2016 (Day 1) - 02/08/2016 14:58
• CD Review: Solitary Experiments - Heavenly Symphony - 11/08/2015 14:29
• Live Review: E-Werk Ost Festival - Dresden 2015 - 09/04/2015 09:30
• Live Review: E-Tropolis Festival - Oberhausen 2015 - 06/04/2015 16:14
• Interview: Solitary Experiments - February 2015 - 18/02/2015 15:48
• CD Review: Solitary Experiments - The 20th Anniversary Compilation - 14/12/2014 15:33
• Live Review: Gothic meets Klassik - Leipzig 2014 (Day 2) - 17/11/2014 14:38
• Live Review: Gothic meets Klassik - Leipzig 2014 (Day 1) - 13/11/2014 11:21
• Live Review: Solitary Experiments (20th Anniversary celebration) - Berlin 2014 - 30/10/2014 14:41
• Live Review: M’era Luna Festival - Hildesheim 2014 (Day 1) - 21/08/2014 13:50

Comments powered by CComment

Latest Previews

• Preview FRONT 242 - Oberhausen 2024-10-19
• Preview LAIBACH - Bochum 2024-10-20
• Preview COLD HEARTED FESTIVAL - Bochum 2024-11-15
• Preview INTERPOL - Cologne 2024-10-25
• Preview IST IST - Bielefeld 2024-11-16
• Preview MOLCHAT DOMA - Hamburg 2024-11-04
• Preview SOLAR FAKE - Hanover 2024-12-13
• Preview DAVID GARRETT - Hanover 2025-04-01
• Preview STEVEN WILSON - Germany 2025
• Preview ALICE COOPER - Oberhausen 2024-10-06
• Preview MARC ALMOND - Cologne 2024-09-30
• Preview MOBY - Düsseldorf 2024-09-23
• Preview KITE - Dortmund 2024-09-23
• Preview GUANO APES - Dortmund 2024-09-21
• Preview HEILUNG - Cologne 2024-09-19
• Preview PETER FOX - Cologne 2024-09-11
• Preview THE GHOST INSIDE - Cologne 2024-10-26
• Preview SEPULTURA - Cologne 2024-11-02
• Preview WHILE SHE SLEEPS - Oberhausen 2024-11-07
• Preview TRENTEMØLLER - Cologne 2024-11-16

Latest Raffles

• Raffle: HURRICANE & SOUTHSIDE FESTIVAL 2020 - Win Festival Goodies
• Raffle: Win Tickets for JO QUAIL in Germany 2020
• Raffle: Win Tickets for Hatari

Buy Music & Merch!

Search Event Tickets

• Forgot your password?
• Forgot your username?
• Create an account

England's margin for error fades as Euro 2024 knockouts loom

C OLOGNE, Germany -- The time for improvisation is running out. England 's  insipid 0-0 draw with Slovenia in Cologne on Tuesday might have been enough to seal top spot in Group C, but it only reinforced the idea that manager Gareth Southgate is rolling the dice with his team selection and hoping the right number comes up.

The experiment of using Liverpool defender Trent Alexander-Arnold in midfield was abandoned here with Chelsea 's Conor Gallagher drafted in, the solitary change in personnel from last Thursday's 1-1 draw against Denmark , which raised so many questions and prompted former England captain Gary Lineker to brand their performance as "s---." Tuesday's effort was only marginally better, despite all the prematch talk of righting wrongs and sending a positive message.

There was a better basic structure here, England switching from 4-2-3-1 to 4-3-3, with centre-back Marc Guéhi -- one second-half mistake aside -- a stoic presence in defence. They kept the ball with more authority as Declan Rice came back to something close to his prime Arsenal form.

Beyond that, though, England's collective attacking players were once again considerably less than the sum of their stellar individual parts against a weaker team than Denmark.

It all felt thrown together in treacle: a menagerie of individuals struggling to find each other with any rhythm or tempo, stymied a little by the sweltering heat of a German summer arriving better late than never. But the heat does not explain the conservatism in possession, the reluctance to take a risk, the lack of innovation from Harry Kane , Jude Bellingham , Phil Foden (the best of the quartet) and Bukayo Saka -- four players whose innate quality decides games at club level on a weekly basis.

Southgate is a methodical manager by trade, meticulous in his planning. His biggest asset remains tournament experience.

Four tournaments as a player, now four as a manager, the 53-year-old reconnected England with their beleaguered supporters after taking charge in 2016 and found a formula that dragged them closer than any other manager since Sir Alf Ramsey in 1966 to a second major international honour, when losing the Euro 2020 final to Italy on penalties.

But England quite simply look less likely to lift a trophy now than they did even two years ago at the last World Cup. And that connection with the fans is being tested to the limit; Southgate made a point of applauding the fans housed at one end of RheinEnergieStadion and some responded in kind, but others booed and a couple threw beer cups in his direction.

A decision will be made after these Euros whether Southgate stays on through the 2026 World Cup. Some appear to have made their mind up already, believing the team has outgrown him.

"I understand it," Southgate said of the mixed reaction to him. "I'm not going to back away from it. The most important thing here is that the supporters stay with the team.

"I understand the narrative towards me and that's better for than it being towards them, but it is creating an unusual environment to operate in. I've not seen any team qualify and receive similar.

"We've made England over the last six or seven years fun again. I think it has been enjoyable for the players. We've got to be very, very careful that it stays that way.

"I recognise that when you have moments at the end of the game, I'm asking the players to be fearless, I'm not going to back down from going over and thanking the fans who were brilliant during the game. They might feel differently towards me, but for me, we only will succeed if we are together. That energy is crucial for the team and it is so important they stay with the team, however they feel towards me."

Southgate's search for answers could yield something from elements of the second half.

Gallagher lasted 45 minutes to be replaced by Kobbie Mainoo , who looked more comfortable as a No. 8; Southgate is often chastised for waiting to substitute players, but he didn't dither on this occasion. Cole Palmer was bright on his first appearance of the finals, coming on for the final 19 minutes.

There was one genuinely sharp move in each half. Saka finished a slick move 20 minutes in, but Foden was well offside in the build-up.

And in stoppage time, Anthony Gordon , also making his tournament debut, played an excellent early forward pass for Mainoo to flick onto Kane, who in turn found Palmer. The Chelsea playmaker could only fire straight at Slovenia goalkeeper Jan Oblak , but the sight of three substitutes combining with a mixture of quick thinking and fearlessness offers hope England can rouse themselves from their collective slumber when the knockout rounds begin.

Yet Southgate is scrambling. Bellingham was disappointing, kept on by reputation rather than influence. During one second-half spell, he went out left so Foden could come more inside. Briefly, he went to the right when Palmer tried to affect the game out on the left. None of it suited him.

The good news is England have four days to try to find some clarity in the confusion. Results elsewhere mean their route from here is not as fearsome as it might have been, a familiar stroke of luck Southgate has enjoyed in previous tournaments as manager.

France , Portugal , Spain and Germany are all in the opposite half of the draw. Netherlands and Italy could lie in wait in the next two rounds -- two traditional powerhouses who have so far underperformed -- and Kane was right to point out England have usually improved under Southgate the deeper they go.

"If you look at previous tournaments we have played our best football in the knockout rounds," the England captain said. "Last Euros against Germany, Ukraine and Denmark, so for sure there is more to come."

That really needs to ring true this time. England have to get the formula right in Gelsenkirchen on Sunday. The margin for error is disappearing fast.

• Live on Sky
• Get Sky Sports
• Sky Mobile Apps
• Kick It Out
• Black Lives Matter
• British South Asians in Football

Euro 2024 last 16: Should Cristiano Ronaldo start for Portugal vs Slovenia? And why the pressure is on Virgil van Dijk

The Euro 2024 last 16 matches continue on Saturday, with Sky Sports football writers previewing the action; Still to come: Germany vs Denmark, England vs Slovakia, Spain vs Georgia, France vs Belgium, Portugal vs Slovenia, Romania vs Netherlands, Austria vs Turkey

Saturday 29 June 2024 17:50, UK

Why Kroos' performances show he shouldn't retire

Germany vs Denmark , Saturday June 29, 8pm, Dortmund

LaLiga winner, Champions League winner, and now representing his country in a home tournament - Toni Kroos is going out on a high. But is the 34-year-old too good to be retiring from all professional football after this tournament?

Kroos is not just a key cog in a Germany team that has largely impressed so far, he has been one of the outstanding all-round midfielders in the tournament. The ultimate metronome.

It begs the question: why? For both Germany and Real Madrid, he could be the key difference for years to come.

• Play resumes after thunderstorm stops Germany vs Denmark LIVE!
• Transfer Centre LIVE! Ugarte, Zirkzee, Dewsbury-Hall latest
• Highlights: India beat South Africa in T20 World Cup final thriller
• Newcastle accept Brighton's £33m bid for Minteh
• Liverpool's move for Newcastle winger Gordon breaks down
• Stewards make decisions on McLaren protest, Mercedes and Verstappen
• Rate the players as Italy limp out to Switzerland LIVE!
• India win T20 World Cup after astounding Suryakumar catch
• England vs Slovakia: Trippier fit; late call over Shaw inclusion
• The greatest catch ever? | INCREDIBLE fielding by SKY in last over of T20 final!
• Latest News

Kroos has been tempted out of retirement before. He nearly quit the game 12 months ago but Real Madrid convinced him to stay another year. He then came out of international retirement in February.

"I've told him we are waiting for him to change his mind," said Real Madrid boss Carlo Ancelotti this month.

Who is playing who in the Euro 2024 last 16?

How did the group stages end?

Download the Sky Sports App

Get Sky Sports on WhatsApp

Go on Toni, give us more one farewell tour. Sam Blitz

Slovakia tie a reminder of England's long-standing problems

England vs Slovakia , Sunday June 30, 5pm, Gelsenkirchen

Struggling to break down the opposition. Laboured and short of ideas in possession. A star forward operating in the wrong areas. Makeshift midfield solutions. A pacey forward on the bench who could stretch the play not deployed. Wide players not delivering end product - would Marcus Rashford be a better option? And Harry Kane struggling to make an impact...

But enough about Sam Allardyce's solitary game in charge of England.

Eight years on, England meet Slovakia again. Another 1-0 would do the job at Euro 2024 but it is striking that Gareth Southgate is wrestling with similar issues to the ones which were on show in that World Cup qualifier in September 2016.

England are a better side now, no question. But familiar problems are preventing them from realising their potential in Germany so far.

Will Southgate cut loose and harness the pace of Anthony Gordon, or, like Allardyce with Jamie Vardy, keep his speedster in reserve? Remarkably, Allardyce said after that win it wasn't for him to tell a dropping-deep Wayne Rooney where to play. England supporters will hope Southgate uses a firmer hand to remodel his midfield and maximise the qualities of Jude Bellingham and co on Sunday.

An improved performance is needed from this current Three Lions group to prevent Slovakia being Southgate's final fixture in charge of England as it was for Allardyce. Peter Smith

Spain bringing the fun factor to Euro 2024

Spain vs Georgia , Sunday June 30, 8pm, Cologne

Thinking back to the great Spanish teams of Xavi and Andres Iniesta who won three straight major tournaments between 2008-2012 has made me think. Although delightful and revolutionary with their football, dare I say it, they could be quite boring to watch. Pass. Pass. Pass. Then we'll pass some more.

This Spain team, who are the only team with a 100 per cent record in the tournament and to have yet concede a goal, are trying to follow in some pretty huge footsteps. But they are doing it very differently. It's football that is pure fun.

Without the ball, they play a high risky defensive line and press the opposition with great intensity. With the ball, they play direct into their pacey and powerful wingers and get the ball into the box. It's proving hard to stop, especially as they can switch it up at anytime to play possession football, too. Rodri, Fabian Ruiz and Pedri are simply sublime footballers with the ball. They rarely waste it.

Just look at what they did to Italy. The 1-0 scoreline hugely flattered the Italians.

The shot count was 20-4, the expected goals numbers 2.02-0.16 and the passes in the final third 176-66.

The underlying metrics back up the visuals. Spain are the real deal. Lewis Jones

Can goal-shy neighbours France and Belgium finally kick into gear?

France vs Belgium , Monday July 1, 5pm, Dusseldorf

As the sides ranked second and third in the world going into the tournament, it was no surprise France and Belgium were among the pre-tournament favourites going into Euro 2024. To this point, however, neither has provided much justification as to why.

Let's start with France. A Max Wober own goal saw them beat Austria 1-0, before draws with the Netherlands and Poland meant they finished second in Group D, runners-up to Ralf Rangnick's impressive aforementioned Austria. And the stats that accompany the grossly unspectacular performance do not make for enjoyable reading.

Les Bleus' tally of just two goals was their fewest in a major tournament group since the 2010 World Cup - and with the second coming by way of a Kylian Mbappe penalty, Didier Deschamps' side racked up 47 non-penalty attempts without scoring, generating 5.88 xG along the way. Not only that, only Serbia (3.8 per cent) had a poorer shot conversion rate in the group stage than France's - and indeed Belgium's - 4.2 per cent.

Belgium have not fared much better, with Youri Tielemans and Kevin De Bruyne's goals in the 2-0 win over Romania their only strikes so far. They, too, racked up 48 attempts across their three group games - 18 of which were on target - and generated 4.34 xG. A significant underperformance, by any standards, but admittedly not unexpected; they have now scored just three goals from 9.15 xG across the current tournament and the 2022 World Cup.

That said, VAR has been the most painful of thorns in their side. In their opening defeat to Slovakia, Romelu Lukaku had one goal chalked off for a marginal offside and another, controversially, ruled out after the ball struck Lois Openda's hand in the build-up. Lukaku then struck to double the Red Devils' lead against Romania, only to see his third 'goal' suffer the same fate as his first.

It hasn't been pretty so far, but with a place in the quarter-finals up for grabs, there's no time like the present for one - or both - of these near neighbours to finally kick into gear. Dan Long

Is Ronaldo still good enough start?

Portugal vs Slovenia , Monday July 1, 8pm, Frankfurt

Euro 2024 so far has not been vintage for strikers - Harry Kane and Kylian Mbappe have just one goal each. Romelu Lukaku and Cristiano Ronaldo have none.

But any talk of Ronaldo potentially being dropped is likely to be unfounded. Despite being 39, the captain has still moved and played well in the group stages, linking up nicely with the wide players.

He has an assist too for Bruno Fernandes' goal against Turkey, and has registered the most shots (12) of the tournament. He ranks in the top 10 too for touches in the opposition box (16), shots on target (5) and big chances created (2).

Some of these conversations may have stemmed from his substitution in the 66th minute against Georgia - but hardly any of the Portugal team covered themselves in glory that day.

Ultimately, Ronaldo is still considered one of the best to ever play the game and looks far from finished on the international stage.

He lends Portugal a gravitas and aura that few other players can provide, and expect him to have more goal involvements before his tournament is out. Charlotte Marsh

Van Dijk and Dutch must show their true colours

Romania vs Netherlands , Tuesday July 2, 5pm, Munich

The Netherlands' team are becoming a party-pooper for its thousands of exuberant orange-clad fans after dark horses Austria turned the Oranje to squash in arguably the game of the tournament so far.

That 3-2 loss demolished confidence but Romania offers a golden opportunity to set up a swift chance for revenge provided Ralf Rangnick's side defeat Turkey.

For that to happen, Virgil van Dijk must rediscover his best form. Marco van Basten has doubled down this week on his criticism of the Liverpool captain.

"He's got to lead and he's the one we're going to hold accountable in the end," the 59-year-old said. "He has to organise things and he is responsible. He is the great leader of the team and you have to organise these kinds of things better.

Van Dijk: Dutch may have overestimated own qualities

"I can completely understand the criticism," Van Dijk told a Friday press conference. "I'm not stupid, I also know that I can do better and that it should be better, and that's what I'm working on. "I didn't play my best game against Austria. It does affect me, I also think that things overall can and should be better. The whole team didn't run, but I look first at myself. I could have brought much more. "Maybe we overestimate ourselves. A lot had to be said and we had to analyse a lot. Things went completely wrong against Austria. It was very bad. We have talked about many aspects, now we have to show it. "It was not the tactics where things went wrong. It was mainly the will to win, to win that second ball. You don't have to talk about that with the coaches, the players must do that among themselves. So, we have talked about that...and with harsh words."

"Unfortunately, the criticism has not led to improvement, because it is actually the same points that are not going well. In that respect, it's a bit disappointing. I'm sorry I have to say it again, but I can also keep my mouth shut."

He is of course not alone in shouldering the blame for the loss in Berlin.

Ronald Koeman's team are missing influential midfielder Frenkie de Jong, who failed to recover from an ankle injury in time for the tournament. Teun Koopmeiners was also forced to drop out while Joey Veerman was hooked after 35 minutes in the Austria loss.

A midfield imbalance is not only afflicting England out in Germany. Unlike Gareth Southgate, Koeman is not afraid to make changes - but so far, none have paid off.

Despite the problems, the Netherlands will be favoured to overcome Romania, giving Koeman and Van Dijk another shot at breaking the longstanding Dutch tradition of disappointing at major tournaments. Ben Grounds

Dangerous Austria are a force to be reckoned with

Austria vs Turkey , Tuesday July 2, 8pm, Leipzig

Ralf Rangnick admitted there was scepticism among the players when he was hired as Austria's manager in 2022, but those doubts have been quickly eradicated after the national team finished top of their group at a European Championship for the first time in their history.

Known as one of the godfathers of "gegenpressing", the German has left a permanent mark on modern football and Austria's current squad is excelling under his guidance.

Their aggressive, front-foot approach saw them perform well in a narrow loss to France before more eye-catching displays followed in deserved wins over Poland and the Netherlands .

While Austria's tireless running and fluid movement caused the Dutch constant problems last time out, their never-say-die attitude - instilled by Rangnick - was equally as impressive.

Many will view a country ranked 25th in the world as a surprise package at this tournament, but Austria have now lost just twice in 19 matches.

Rangnick's side are a force to be reckoned with and won't fear anyone in the knockout stage. They are on the same side of the draw as England. The Three Lions better watch out. Dan Sansom

Correctly predict six scorelines for a chance to win £250,000 for free. Entries by 3pm Saturday.

Stream the T20 World Cup, the World Cup of Darts and more

• Upgrade Now

The Federal Register

The daily journal of the united states government, request access.

Due to aggressive automated scraping of FederalRegister.gov and eCFR.gov, programmatic access to these sites is limited to access to our extensive developer APIs.

If you are human user receiving this message, we can add your IP address to a set of IPs that can access FederalRegister.gov & eCFR.gov; complete the CAPTCHA (bot test) below and click "Request Access". This process will be necessary for each IP address you wish to access the site from, requests are valid for approximately one quarter (three months) after which the process may need to be repeated.

An official website of the United States government.

If you want to request a wider IP range, first request access for your current IP, and then use the "Site Feedback" button found in the lower left-hand side to make the request.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 28 June 2024

Synergistic olfactory processing for social plasticity in desert locusts

• Inga Petelski 1 , 2 , 3   na1 ,
• Yannick Günzel   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7553-4742 1 , 2 , 3 , 4   na1 ,
• Sercan Sayin 2 , 4 ,
• Susanne Kraus 2 &
• Einat Couzin-Fuchs   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-345X 2 , 3 , 4  

Nature Communications volume  15 , Article number:  5476 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

10 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Olfactory system
• Sensory processing
• Social behaviour

Desert locust plagues threaten the food security of millions. Central to their formation is crowding-induced plasticity, with social phenotypes changing from cryptic (solitarious) to swarming (gregarious). Here, we elucidate the implications of this transition on foraging decisions and corresponding neural circuits. We use behavioral experiments and Bayesian modeling to decompose the multi-modal facets of foraging, revealing olfactory social cues as critical. To this end, we investigate how corresponding odors are encoded in the locust olfactory system using in-vivo calcium imaging. We discover crowding-dependent synergistic interactions between food-related and social odors distributed across stable combinatorial response maps. The observed synergy was specific to the gregarious phase and manifested in distinct odor response motifs. Our results suggest a crowding-induced modulation of the locust olfactory system that enhances food detection in swarms. Overall, we demonstrate how linking sensory adaptations to behaviorally relevant tasks can improve our understanding of social modulation in non-model organisms.

Similar content being viewed by others

Visual recognition of social signals by a tectothalamic neural circuit

Alarm communication predates eusociality in termites

Olfactory coding in the antennal lobe of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris

Introduction.

The ability to adapt to a changing social environment is a fundamental aspect of life. Locusts exhibit a distinct ability to switch between a solitary and gregarious lifestyle rapidly, rendering them an ideal model for studying social plasticity and the emergence of collective behavior. Furthermore, these transitions are central to the formation of large-scale destructive locust outbreaks, which are precipitated by an autocatalytic process of positive feedback between population density and aggregation behavior 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . When population density spontaneously increases, formerly solitarious locusts are forced to conglomerate on limited resources, leading to further increases in local density and subsequent directed aggregation of animals that have become gregarious. These dynamics also trigger changes in other density-dependent traits, including metabolism, developmental, and reproductive physiology, which together foster population growth and swarm formation (cumulatively termed ’phase change’, 3 ). As crowding further increases, the demand for nutrients rises, compelling large locust aggregations to leave areas with low food availability and forage despite associated risks of predation and cannibalism 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 . These rapid density-dependent adaptations pose questions about the neural processing in changing social environments that allow animals to adjust their decision-making appropriately in a context-dependent manner.

The transition to group living also alters the sensory information available to locusts when searching and selecting feeding sites. Gregarious desert locusts ( Schistocerca gregaria ) effectively utilize both asocial (e.g., sight and/or smell of food) and social (e.g., presence or action of conspecifics) cues for their foraging decisions 10 . Specifically, the decision to join a food patch is positively influenced by the number of conspecifics on the patch, as well as by its quality and the locust’s prior experience with it. However, our understanding of the sensory processes that mediate these density-dependent decisions remains limited.

Like many animals, locusts use olfactory information to locate food, find mates, and avoid predators or toxins. Invariably, olfactory systems face the challenge of encoding and decoding a vast array of chemical structures across varying odor concentrations and mixtures in turbulent environments. Knowledge gained about olfactory systems across the animal kingdom has demonstrated a largely typical organization of a single neuropile—the antennal lobe (AL) in insects and the olfactory bulb in mammals—located only one synapse away from the peripheral sensory neurons 11 . To meet the challenge of complexity in chemical space, the antennal lobe (like the olfactory bulb) acts as an early processing center in which numerous incoming olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) converge on fewer output projection neurons (PNs). Non-linear summation in such synapses and gain control mediated by local neurons enables the coding of odors over dynamic ranges 12 .

Invertebrate and vertebrate model systems in olfactory research, including rodents 13 , zebrafish 14 , and fruit flies 15 , have a typical early olfactory coding architecture. Convergent input and output neurons form a computational unit called the glomerulus. Each glomerulus receives input from all ORNs expressing the same olfactory receptor type, and most output neurons are exclusive to a particular glomerulus 11 . Such a glomerular structure effectively organizes olfactory coding in linear and parallel channels. In locusts, however, the AL structure and connectivity deviate from those of many insects 16 . In contrast to, for example, 50 individually identified glomeruli in the fruit fly 15 , it houses an unusually large number of more than a thousand so-called microglomeruli and more strikingly, all output PNs innervate multiple microglomeruli (no uniglomerular PNs have been described to date), and each ORN projects to multiple glomeruli 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 . Consequently, it is largely unknown how this structural difference impacts locust olfaction and if it is related to the notable phenotypic plasticity many locust species exhibit.

While the wiring of the locust antennal lobe remains unresolved, research on odor processing in locusts has played a pioneering role in advancing our understanding of combinatorial coding in olfactory systems 21 , 22 , 23 . Using intracellular and extracellular recording techniques and computational models, locust odor representation has been postulated as a dynamic combinatorial code 19 , 20 , suitable for rapid discrimination of odor identity and intensity 24 , 25 , as well as for contrast enhancement when stimuli overlap or follow distractor odors 26 , 27 , 28 . Despite the importance of combinatorial coding and ensemble dynamics, most data sets captured only a fraction of antennal lobe output at a given recording or lacked the cell’s identity, which prevented assigning structure to function. Both problems can be addressed with functional imaging techniques that allow monitoring of network-spanning dynamics, which is particularly important for the highly distributed innervation of the locust AL.

To this end, we have established a functional imaging protocol to investigate the spatial organization of odor-evoked activity in a large subset of PNs of the locust AL. We map the interaction between food and social odors in gregarious and solitarious locusts to examine how odor representation is impacted by crowding. We link our findings to the animals’ preferences in a behavioral assay by estimating the contribution of different sensory cues to foraging decisions. Our results reveal a crowding-induced olfactory modulation and advance the accessibility of locusts as a model system for studying collective behavior and the neuronal mechanisms underlying social plasticity.

Social plasticity and the sensory basis of foraging decisions

We start our investigation of how population density is linked with sensory processing and decision-making by analyzing the contribution of different sensory modalities to foraging decisions, focusing on social and food olfactory cues. For this, we employed simple patch selection assays that presented locusts with four options: food (blackberry leaves, denoted as L v s ), a social setting (eight gregarious locusts, L c t ), a combination of leaves and locusts ( L v s L c t ), and an empty control patch ( C t r ). We controlled the availability of olfactory and visual cues by using different stimulus containers that either provided both visual and olfactory cues or limited one of them (see Fig.  1 a and Methods for details). We observed that gregarious desert locusts, Schistocerca gregaria , exhibited a strong attraction to the patch containing both leaves and locusts, as shown in Fig.  1 b ( V i s (+) O l f (+)). This attraction diminished in the absence of either visual ( V i s (−) O l f (+)) or olfactory cues ( V i s (+) O l f (−), see also Supplementary Fig.  1 for animal trajectories). In contrast, solitarious locusts typically disregarded social stimuli and predominantly approached patches where food was presented alone (Fig.  1 d). Notably, just as with gregarious animals, the choices of solitarious locusts were most pronounced when both visual and olfactory cues were available.

a Animals were tested in a circular arena with four patch options (blackberry leaves L v s , locusts L c t , leaves and locusts L v s L c t , and control C t r ) under one out of three sensory conditions (visual and olfactory cues available: V i s (+) O l f (+); olfactory but no visual cues: V i s (-) O l f (+); visual but no olfactory cues: V i s (+) O l f (-)) to isolate the effects of visual and olfactory cues during patch selection. On the left, we show a color-inverted, example frame from a gregarious animal trial. Here, the superimposed circles indicate the four patches, and the square shows the location of the locust. We used different stimulus containers for the different sensory conditions (schematics on the right) that were either transparent and odor-permeable with surrounding holes to provide both visual and olfactory cues ( V i s (+) O l f (+)), opaque with holes to restrict visual cues ( V i s (-) O l f (+)), or transparent but sealed with Parafilm (blue-shaded top) to restrict olfactory cues ( V i s (+) O l f (-)). b We tested gregarious locusts under the three sensory conditions. Heatmaps depict average locust density in each stimulus quarter (blackberry leaves L v s , locusts L c t , leaves and locusts L v s L c t , and control C t r ) for different sensory conditions (visual and olfactory cues available: V i s (+) O l f (+), left ( n  = 26); olfactory but no visual cues: V i s (-) O l f (+), center ( n  = 26); visual but no olfactory cues: V i s (+) O l f (-), right ( n  = 28)). Swarm plots represent individual locusts' mean density in each stimulus quarter, dark gray bar plots with error bars indicate corresponding grand means with 95% confidence intervals, and light gray bar plots with error bars indicate means and 95% credible intervals from a decision-making model (5000 simulations; see Methods). c Information reliability scores for each information class (social, food) and sensory modality (visual, olfactory), were obtained by fitting a decision-making model to the patch selection data in ( b ). d , e Similar experiments and analysis as in ( b , c ) but for solitarious animals ( V i s (+) O l f (+): n  = 25; V i s (-) O l f (+): n  = 32; V i s (+) O l f (-): n  = 25). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

We dissected the contributions of different sensory cues to the decision process via a Bayesian decision-making model 10 , 29 , extended to encompass the four types of cues available in the current assay: vision, olfaction, social, and food. Specifically, we estimated the reliability of each information class—socio-visual, food-visual, socio-olfactory, and food-olfactory—to elucidate how these factors influence locusts’ choices (Fig.  1 c and e, light gray bars; reliability parameter C i in Eqn. ( 1 )). The close alignment between our model’s predictions and the observed choices (light and dark gray bars respectively in Fig.  1 b and d) suggests that the integration of available sensory cues can effectively describe locust decisions. This model enabled us to dissect further and quantify the parameters that contributed to these decisions. Notably, we found that gregarious animals were highly responsive to social cues, with the highest information reliability scores associated with the presence of conspecific odors at a patch (Fig.  1 c). In contrast, solitarious-reared animals appeared deterred by the sight of conspecifics, as indicated by their negative scores in this context (Fig.  1 e).

Functional imaging revealed differences in olfactory processing between gregarious and solitarious locusts

Building on the importance of olfaction in patch discrimination, we mapped how respective odor cues are represented in the locust antennal lobe (AL). An anatomical reconstruction of the AL, using back-fill labeling of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) and projection neurons (PNs), shows the arrangement of PN cell bodies on the anterior surface of the AL, with their dendrites situated beneath, encircling a central fiber core. Here, they form functional units, microglomeruli, with ORN axon terminals (Fig.  2 a–c). To monitor local calcium signals as a proxy for neuronal activity, we established a protocol for functional imaging via mass retrograde labeling of PNs with the fluorescent calcium indicator Cal-520 30 . This technique was optimized to label the vast majority of PNs, facilitating subsequent optical recordings (see Methods for further details).

a Maximum projection of a confocal stack of a projection neuron (PN) backfill staining along the z -axis (top) or the y -axis (bottom). b Identification of 181 individually stained PN somata (superimposed green dots) in one section of the scanned locust antennal lobe. c Confocal scans with a double backfill staining of PNs (green) and olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs, magenta) at various imaging depths (indicated above, Z  = 0 corresponds to the anterior surface of the AL). d Schematic diagram detailing the staining protocol for PNs in locust antennal lobes for in-vivo functional calcium imaging and the subsequent analysis pipeline (see Methods for specifics). e Gas chromatography analysis identifies leaf alcohol acetate ( L a a , cis-3-Hexenyl Acetate) and leaf alcohol ( Z 3 h l , 3-Hexen-1-ol) as prominent food-related volatiles in blackberry leaves. f Confocal microscopy data of odor-induced responses to the locust odor L c t (left), leaf alcohol acetate L a a (center), and their combination L a a L c t (right). Average activity time courses (grand means with 95% confidence intervals as shaded areas) show the responses of all gregarious animals ( n  = 28), while the false color-coded images show the mean intensity projections of an exemplary animal during the window for analysis (dark gray bars below the time courses; stimulus onset is indicated by vertical dotted lines). Responses to the solvent are shown as light gray time courses. g Evaluation of gregarious animals' mixture responses to test for generality (increase in response magnitude for other food-related stimuli upon addition of the social component) and specificity (the increase in mixture response occurs only for the combination of a food-related with a social stimulus). Swarm plots show individual animal means during the window for analysis, violin plots indicate probability density estimates, while crosses depict grand means and 95% confidence intervals for all stimuli ( L a a , Z 3 h l , and 1-Octanol O c t ) and respective combinations (generality: n ( f o o d 1+ s o c i a l )  = 28, n ( f o o d 2+ s o c i a l )  = 20; specificity: n ( o t h e r + f o o d )  = 11, n ( f o o d + f o o d )  = 25, n ( o t h e r + s o c i a l )  = 11). h , i Correspond to ( f , g ), but for solitarious animals (generality: n ( f o o d 1+ s o c i a l )  = 19, n ( f o o d 2+ s o c i a l )  = 9; specificity: n ( o t h e r + f o o d )  = 9, n ( f o o d + f o o d )  = 9, n ( o t h e r + s o c i a l )  = 10). Statistical inferences in ( g ) and ( i ) were based on paired two-tailed bootstrap randomization tests (ns: not significant; * p  < 0.05: ** p  < 0.01: *** p  < 0.001 with gregarious p ( f o o d 1+ s o c i a l )  = 3.58*10 −5 , p ( f o o d 2+ s o c i a l )  = 0.0237, p ( o t h e r + f o o d )  = 0.2781, p ( f o o d + f o o d )  = 0.8534, p ( o t h e r + s o c i a l )  = 0.1411; solitarious p ( f o o d 1+ s o c i a l )  = 0.0316, p ( f o o d 2+ s o c i a l )  = 0.3539, p ( o t h e r + f o o d )  = 0.6247, p ( f o o d + f o o d )  = 0.9531, p ( o t h e r + s o c i a l )  = 0.0601). Scale bars: 100 μ m. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Furthermore, we developed a data-driven analysis pipeline (Fig.  2 d) that segments the highly arborized structure of the locust AL into distinct activity granules and overcomes the limitations of biased manual selection of specific regions of interest. Calcium signals were captured at focal depths of 35 ± 25 μ m and 140 ± 25 μ m, chosen to maximize the number of detectable cell bodies and glomeruli, respectively (see Fig.  2 c for anatomical reference with examples of functional maps below).

Interested in the AL representation of the cues presented in our behavioral experiment, we conducted a chemical analysis to identify dominant volatiles in the headspace of the blackberry leaves. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopic analysis featured two prominent appetitive plant volatiles 19 : leaf alcohol acetate (cis-3-Hexenyl-acetate, denoted as L a a ) and the leaf alcohol 3-Hexel-1-ol (denoted as Z 3 h l ), Fig.  2 e. We then used the identified volatiles and an extraction of the locust odor ( L c t ) as stimuli to measure PN responses in gregarious and solitarious animals.

Each stimulus elicited a response apparent as calcium signals in a large set of PNs distributed across the AL (functional maps at the focal depth of the cell bodies show odor-induced responses in regions matching in size, shape, and number to individual cell bodies; examples in Fig.  2 f and h). In both gregarious and solitarious locusts, response magnitudes to the leaf odor (the prevalent leaf component L a a ) were higher than those to the locust odor L c t (green and orange curves in Fig.  2 f and h show population response averages for L a a and L c t , with respective responses to the solvent as control in gray). Notably, however, was the respective change in response magnitude when both odors were simultaneously delivered as a mixture ( L a a L c t ; containing half the amount of each single component; see Methods for mixture preparation). PN responses of gregarious animals significantly increased when adding the social component to the food-related one ( p  < 0.0001; paired two-tailed bootstrap randomization test), while in solitarious animals, adding the social component resulted even in a significant decrease in response magnitude ( p  = 0.0316; see average time courses in Fig.  2 f–h with the respective comparisons for individual data points in the left panels of Fig.  2 g–i for gregarious and solitarious animals, respectively). This difference is also reflected by the population response trajectories (Supplementary Fig.  4 ), illustrating distinct response patterns for the different stimuli that are generally consistent across the two phenotypes, albeit with noticeable differences (especially in the first principal component).

We observed similar findings when testing PN responses to crushed blackberry leaves ( L v s ) in combination with the locust odor (Supplementary  Methods and Supplementary Fig.  2 a–e). Here, the response magnitude to L v s L c t mixture was significantly higher compared to the individual components L v s and L c t in gregarious ( p  = 0.02; paired two-tailed bootstrap randomization test) but not in solitarious ( p  > 0.99) locusts. Since this experiment was conducted with a widefield microscope, which—despite being faster—lacks the capacity for thin optical slices, we replicated the experiments with leaf alcohol acetate L a a for a direct comparison (Supplementary Fig.  2g–j ). With similar response magnitudes and comparable differences between the phenotypes, these results align with the confocal data. Additional tests of antennal responsiveness to the odors via electroantennograms (EAG), reflecting summed receptor potentials along the antenna 31 , show almost identical response patterns in gregarious and solitarious antennae (Supplementary Fig.  3c , d ). This observation suggests the differences between the social phenotypes are not present presynaptically to the AL. Altogether, we propose that neural processing of odor mixtures in locusts may be subjected to a density-dependent modulation in the AL, highlighting a potential neural mechanism underlying differences in social behavior.

Generality and specificity of synergistic mixture response

Next, we tested whether the increased response to the mixture could be generalized to other food-related components. For that, a subset of animals was tested with additional odor combinations, beginning with the second appetitive plant volatile in the blackberry leaf headspace, Z 3 h l 32 . As for L a a and crushed leaves, PN responses to Z 3 h l in gregarious locusts significantly increased when the social component was added ( p  = 0.0237 for Z 3 h l vs Z 3 h l L c t ; paired two-tailed bootstrap randomization test). At the same time, in solitarious locusts, the response to the same mixture was not higher than to the individual components ( p  = 0.3539).

Considering the consistent phenotypic differences across all mixtures tested so far, we explored the possibility that mixture processing is broadly different in the two social phenotypes. We addressed this by evaluating whether the observed increase in gregarious response magnitude is specific to a mixture of a social with a food-related stimulus or whether it can also be observed for other mixtures. For this, we tested additional odor combinations containing a non-social and/or non-food component, combining equal amounts of a neutral (non-food and non-social) component 1-Octanol with L a a ( O c t L a a , other+food), L a a with the second leaf component Z 3 h l ( L a a Z 3 h l , food+food) and the mixture of 1-Octanol with L c t ( O c t L c t , other+social). For gregarious locusts (Fig.  2 g), neither of the combinations—other+food, food+food, other+social—induced a change in PN responses magnitude ( p  = 0.2781, p  = 0.8534, and p  = 0.1411, respectively; paired two-tailed bootstrap randomization tests). Similarly, but as expected, no increase was observed for solitarious animals either ( p  = 0.6247, p  = 0.9531, and p  = 0.0601). Taken together, these findings suggest that the consistently increased response observed in gregarious locusts when combining a social with a food-related odor— L a a L c t , Z 3 h l L c t , and L v s L c t (Supplementary Fig.  2 for the later)—represents a phenotype-specific difference in which the salience of food odors is heightened when accompanied by the presence of conspecifics.

Combinatorial odor processing with mixture-specific PNs in the locust antennal lobe

We further analyzed the odor-induced response maps to understand better how the mixtures are processed and what may mediate the increase in gregarious animals’ response magnitude. At first, we noted that responses to the different stimuli were highly overlapping. Most PNs responded to multiple tested odors, with only a few responding to a narrower subset (Fig.  3 a). Interestingly, out of these narrower ones, we could detect mixture-specific PNs which were activated by a mixture but not by its components, showing a clear phenotypic difference in the prevalence of L a a L c t -specific cells (red and blue bars in Fig.  3 b show the proportion of mixture-specific PNs in gregarious and solitarious locusts; p ( L a a L c t o n l y )  = 0.0220, p ( O c t L a a o n l y )  = 0.9284, p ( L a a Z 3 h l o n l y )  = 0.1161, p ( O c t L c t o n l y )  = 0.5295; two-sample two-tailed bootstrap randomization tests).

a The proportion of gregarious (red) and solitarious (blue) PNs that respond to a given number of stimuli, as symbolized on the right by the pie charts with the proportion of responses for each PN, overlaid onto the antennal lobe illustration. All animals ( n ( g r e g . )  = 10; n ( s o l i . )  = 8) were tested with nine stimuli (locust odor L c t , leaf alcohol acetate L a a , leaf alcohol Z 3 h l , 1-Octanol O c t , as well as their mixtures L a a L c t , Z 3 h l L c t , O c t L a a , Z 3 h l L a a , and O c t L c t ). b The relative proportion of mixture-specific PNs — regions that are responsive to a two-component mixture ('yes') but not to its two components ('no'). The proportion of mixture-specific PNs was calculated out of all PNs responding to that mixture (specific+non-specific) for gregarious (red; n ( L a a L c t o n l y )  = 28, n ( O c t L a a o n l y )  = 11, n ( Z 3 h l L a a o n l y )  = 15, n ( O c t L c t o n l y )  = 11) and solitarious (blue; n ( L a a L c t o n l y )  = 19, n ( O c t L a a o n l y )  = 9, n ( Z 3 h l L a a o n l y )  = 9, n ( O c t L c t o n l y )  = 10) animals. c Diagram explaining the clustering of individual PNs' response magnitude sets into odor response vectors. The scatter plot displays the linear discriminant analysis 2-D projection after clustering to visualize the classification into activity vectors (circles: gregarious ( n  = 10); diamonds: soliatrious ( n  = 8) animals). d Representation of each odor response vector along with pie charts displaying the relative allocation of gregarious (red) and solitarious (blue) PNs to the respective vector. Bars, color-coded to signify response vector type (color: odor-specific; gray: combinatorial), indicate grand means with 95% confidence interval error bars ( n ( g r e g . )  = 10; n ( s o l i . )  = 8). Statistical inference in ( b ) was based on two-sided two-tailed bootstrap randomization tests (ns: not significant; * p  < 0.05: ** p  < 0.01: *** p  < 0.001: with p ( L a a L c t o n l y )  = 0.022, p ( O c t L a a o n l y )  = 0.9284, n ( Z 3 h l L a a o n l y )  = 0.1161, n ( O c t L c t o n l y )  = 0.5295). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To investigate these PN response patterns, we employed a unified analysis approach. For this, we projected the response maps from all PNs and all tested odors across all animals into a unified odor response space, as illustrated in Fig.  3 c. Despite the considerable overlap described above, we discerned distinct odor response vector classes. These classes aided in delineating PN response types, which we used to explore potential differences between the social phenotypes (Fig.  3 d, and Fig.  3 c for the linear discriminant analysis 2-D projection). Upon evaluating these response vectors, we found that the population response to a specific odor primarily drives certain vectors. For instance, vector 1 is predominantly influenced by L c t , and similarly, vector 2 by Z 3 h l , vector 4 by L a a , and vector 5 by O c t . Conversely, the other vectors encapsulate a more combinatorial response profile. For example, vector 3 demonstrates a combinatorial pattern with responses to a broad set of stimuli. The distribution of PN types according to the odor space clustering was largely similar in both phenotypes, with a difference in prevalence mainly for L c t -positive and L c t -negative types (pie charts in Fig.  3 d show the proportion of each PN type in red and blue for gregarious and solitarious locusts, respectively).

Combinatorial odor maps stay consistent across multiple repetitions

Previous studies on locust odor mapping have shown that, although the population-level responses reliably determine odor identity, there can be substantial variability at the level of individual PNs 25 . Thus, we continued our investigation by examining how consistent odor responses are across repetitions. Response consistency was determined for three general odors in the PN cell bodies (similar optical slice as before) and their dendritic terminals (concentrically arranged glomeruli captured at the focal depth that maximizes the number of visible glomeruli, 140  μ m). As expected from a combinatorial coding system, odor-induced responses had considerable overlap (displayed as a color-coded overlay in Fig.  4 a). However, these responses were distinct across different odors and remained consistent for the same odor over multiple trials (see Fig.  4 b and Supplementary Fig.  5 for individual trials in the example animal, and Fig.  4 c for the population response).

a Examination of projection neuron (PN) response maps in cell bodies (top row) and glomeruli (bottom row) following repeated presentations of three single-molecule odorants (1-Octanol O c t , leaf alcohol acetate L a a , 1-Hexanol H e x ) in an exemplary animal. Individual standard deviation projections of the repeated presentation of three stimuli were overlayed in RGB color space (red: O c t , green: L a a , blue: H e x ) to visualize regions responding to one stimulus alone or to several stimuli (see Supplementary Fig.  5 for all standard deviation projections). b Principal component analysis (PCA) of PN responses to five trials of each odor with an accompanying hierarchical binary cluster tree dendrogram ( c , cophenetic correlation coefficient). Data correspond to ( a ). c Euclidean distance in PC space between responses of trials with the same odor (within) and different odors (between) in n  = 11 gregarious animals. Swarm plots show individual animal means, violin plots for probability density estimates, and crosses for grand means and 95% confidence intervals (with p  = 4.46 * 10 −6 for cell bodies and p  = 6 * 10 −8 for glomeruli). d Functional confocal microscopy data of odor-induced responses to the locust odor L c t , leaf alcohol acetate L a a , and their combination L a a L c t in the glomerulus layer of an exemplary gregarious animal. The heatmaps show the standard deviation projections across all stimuli (grayscale), alongside the mean intensity projections (color) during the window of analysis (see gray bars in ( e )). e Average activity time courses of all glomerular regions (medial tract excluded; stimulus onset is indicated by vertical dotted lines) across all n  = 15 gregarious animals (grand means with shaded 95% confidence intervals). f Swarm plots of individual animal means during the window of analysis. Violin plots indicate probability density estimates, and crosses show grand means and 95% confidence intervals ( p  = 0.0177, same animals as in ( e )). g – i Correspond to ( d – f ), but for n  = 14 solitarious animals with p  = 0.1141. Statistical inference in ( c ), ( f ), and ( i ) was based on paired two-tailed bootstrap randomization tests (ns: not significant; * p  < 0.05: ** p  < 0.01: *** p  < 0.001). Scale bars: 100  μ m. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Phase-dependent differences are consistent across cell compartments

By recording responses to social and food-related odors in the PN dendrites of gregarious (Fig.  4 d–f) and solitarious (Fig.  4 g–i) animals, we noted a trend further corroborating what we observed in the cell bodies and widefield imaging above. In gregarious animals, the response magnitude to the mixture ( L a a L c t ) was again significantly higher than to L a a alone ( p  = 0.0118; two-tailed bootstrap randomization test). In contrast, we observed a strong trend for a decreased mixture response in solitarious animals ( p  = 0.0761). This is in line with a larger proportion of L a a L c t -specific glomeruli in gregarious (0.12 [0.08, 0.18], mean [95% confidence interval]; Supplementary Table  1 ) than in solitarious animals (0.05 [0.02, 0.08]), and more L a a -specific glomeruli in solitarious (0.23 [0.11, 0.48]) than in gregarious (0.06 [0.04, 0.11]) animals.

Response motif dynamics in the locust antennal lobe reliably predict social phenotypes

Our results repeatedly suggest that social cues synergize with appetitive olfactory signals in antennal lobe projection neurons of gregarious locusts. Moreover, we observed sustained somatic activity patterns (Fig.  2 f and h), which hint at complex response profiles following a network-spanning integration. Unlike transient glomerular responses (Fig.  4 e and h), which could be more critical for stimulus detection, the sustained somatic patterns may provide a continuous assessment of the olfactory landscape for adaptive behavioral output. In view of that, we continued to characterize individual PN response profiles on the level of the cell bodies to uncover what distinguishes gregarious and solitarious phenotypes.

We applied an unsupervised analysis to all PN cell body response profiles resulting from the three stimuli ( L c t , L a a , L a a L c t ), identifying six distinct odor-induced response motifs (Fig.  5 a, b). Ordered by peak magnitude and timing, these motifs categorize PN responses as inhibitory (below baseline motifs 1 and 2), delayed response (motif 3), excitatory phasic (motifs 4), strong excitatory phasic (motifs 5), and excitatory sustained (motif 6). Examining the proportion of PNs in each response category, which were averaged across animals for each stimulus (Fig.  5 c), revealed key differences between gregarious and solitarious locusts (Fig.  5 d). Notably, solitarious animals exhibited a higher prevalence of the inhibitory (motif 2) and delayed (motif 3) responses for the locust colony odor, and a higher prevalence of the strong phasic (motif 5) and sustained (motif 6) response for the food-related stimulus. In contrast, gregarious animals exhibited a higher prevalence of the excitatory phasic response (motif 4) for the mixture.

a Schematic illustration of the clustering process used to categorize the activity profiles of individual cell bodies into six distinct odor-induced response motifs. b Temporal profiles of the response motifs, arranged according to peak magnitude and timing. Shown are grand means for each motif across both gregarious and solitarious animals with shaded 95% confidence intervals ( n ( g r e g . )  = 28; n ( s o l i . )  = 19). c Circular stacked bar plots represent the proportion of each response motif for each of the three stimuli (the locust odor L c t , leaf alcohol acetate L a a , and their combination L a a L c t ). Gregarious animals are shown on the left ( n  = 28), and solitarious animals on the right ( n  = 19). d Distinct differences in response motif allocation between gregarious and solitarious animals. Variations in circle color and size denote the degree of disparity (absolute difference in proportion for each motif and odor). e Diagram demonstrating the dynamics of motif transitions with odors, which lead to a unique motif triplet for every cell body. We used this to calculate a mixture interaction (Bliss) score for each cell, by comparing the observed L a a L c t response motif to the ones expected from the L c t and L a a components if there was no interaction between them. f Analysis of motif interactions using Bliss interaction score time courses to distinguish between synergistic (scores > zero) and antagonistic (scores < zero) interactions between L a a and L c t . Shown are Bliss profiles of the 12 triplet combinations that exhibited the largest differences in prevalence between gregarious and solitarious locusts (cf. Supplementary Table  1 ). g The average (mean with shaded 95% confidence intervals) Bliss interaction score time courses based on all (but those with identical response motifs across all three stimuli) gregarious (red; n  = 28) and solitarious (blue; n  = 19) motif triplets. h A confusion matrix showing correct (white) and incorrect (dark gray) phenotype classifications using a linear discriminant analysis model. The model was trained on the dynamics of motif transitions (the proportion of PNs that switch motifs between for a given change between stimuli; see Supplementary Fig.  6 ) for predicting each animal’s phenotype (see Methods for details). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Particularly interested in what underlies the difference in mixture processing between gregarious and solitarious animals, we conducted a deeper analysis of the synergistic responses to the mixture. We tracked how PN response motif assignments change with odors and hence assigned each PN a response motif triplet. For instance, [2 ∣ 4 ∣ 5] (Fig. 5 e, left) corresponds to the neuron’s response to the three presented stimuli ( L c t , L a a , and L a a L c t ). Based on this information, we calculated an individual mixture-interaction score (Bliss score, Fig.  5 e, right) using Eqn. ( 3 ) 33 . Specifically, we estimated the mixture response as expected if there was no interaction between the individual components ( L a a and L c t ; Eqn. ( 3 ), f e x p e c t e d ) and compared it for each point in time with the observed response motif to the mixture ( L a a L c t ). Consequently, the resulting score distinguishes synergistic interactions (score > zero) from antagonistic ones (score < zero) between L a a and L c t . We observed that certain motif triplets, and thus certain Bliss interaction scores, were more prevalent in either gregarious or solitarious animals. We identified the 12 triplets that most substantially differentiated the two phenotypes (Fig.  5 f; color-coded according to the predominant phase) to further understand the crowding-induced synergy in processing food and social mixtures. Seven of these combinations involved PNs whose mixture responses were determined by either the stronger (e.g., 2 ∣ 5 ∣ 5) or the weaker component (e.g., 3 ∣ 6 ∣ 3). The remaining triplets display substantial mutual synergistic (e.g., 1 ∣ 1 ∣ 4 and 1 ∣ 1 ∣ 6) and antagonistic (e.g., 6 ∣ 6 ∣ 3) interactions, which are predominantly found in gregarious (red bliss score profiles) and solitarious (blue) locusts (see also Supplementary Table 2 for triplet prevalence). These types of gregarious synergistic triplets could account for the mixture-specific PNs labeled in Fig.  3 b. Further, the proportion of strongly synergistic PNs (Bliss score larger than one standard deviation of the whole distribution) was significantly larger in gregarious (0.25 [0.21, 0.30], grand mean [95% confidence interval]) than in solitarious (0.13 [0.10, 0.20]) animals ( p  = 0.0005; two-sample two-tailed bootstrap randomization test). Pooling all PN Bliss interaction scores, except those with identical response motifs for all three stimuli, highlights the differences in mixture interactions between the two phenotypes in the context of their response motifs (Fig.  5 g).

The increased level of synergy in gregarious processing, together with phenotype-specific motif triplets, suggests that the dynamics of motif transitions between odors carry information about odor processing that may classify the phenotypes. Our comprehensive dataset allowed us to estimate the probabilities of motifs changing, given a change in stimulus (see Supplementary Fig.  6 for heatmaps summarizing the occurrence of all motif transitions). Based on this, we examined the predictive strength of a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classification model trained on gregarious and solitarious motif transition maps (see Methods for details). This analysis revealed that antennal lobe response dynamics can reliably distinguish gregarious and solitarious phenotypes with 84.4% correct predictions (Fig.  5 h). Taken together, our analysis suggests that network interaction variations are manifested in shifts of single PN response profiles, which conjointly give rise to a crowding-induced synergy in the olfactory processing of food and social odors.

We investigated the neural processing of olfactory information in changing social environments, allowing locusts to make decisions appropriately in a context-dependent manner. We established an i n- v i v o functional calcium imaging protocol to reliably monitor the activity of a large subset of antennal lobe (AL) projection neurons (PN). Our results indicate a crowding-induced synergy in the processing of food and social odors that originates from phenotype-specific transition dynamics between distinct response motifs. As a direct consequence, this allowed us to use the AL network dynamics to reliably predict whether a locust was gregarious (group-living) or solitarious. Moreover, our study draws connections between the physiological observations and behaviorally tested patch preferences, providing further insight into the locust decision-making system guiding foraging.

During foraging, the presence of others can indicate both resource quality and location, offering graded and discrete information, respectively 34 . In gregarious locusts, this social information serves as an attractive cue for individuals to join a food patch 10 , 35 , potentially even more than the sight/smell of the food itself (Fig.  1 b). We used a Bayesian decision-making rule 10 , 29 , a powerful approach for disentangling multiple contributing factors in behavioral data 36 , 37 , 38 , to estimate the relative contribution of the different cue types. Our analysis indicates that both visual and olfactory cues influenced patch selection, and it revealed phenotype-specific differences: while in solitarious locusts visual cues qualitatively predict patch choices on their own (similar preference in V i s (+) O l f (-) and V i s (+) O l f (+), Fig.  1 d), it is only when both modalities are simultaneously present that a clear preference is demonstrated in gregarious locusts. Taken together, this revealed the nuanced roles different sensory modalities play in affecting locust foraging decisions, allowing for an investigation of the underlying neural mechanisms.

Given the importance of olfaction for patch selection, we monitored odor-induced neuronal activity across the primary olfactory center. The results showed that PN responses to appetitive odors are modulated by phenotype (i.e., with phase change) when mixed with the social odor. Previous work on gregarious and solitarious locusts described that the two phenotypes have a generally similar AL anatomy (except for a higher number of sensilla in solitarious individuals, potentially relating to their longer developmental period 39 ), similar PN spiking properties 20 , and response probabilities to single tested compounds 40 . The ability to map odor responses across a large set of PNs in a single animal verified that the phenotypic differences are indeed subtle (i.e., same response motifs in Fig.  5 b; largely overlapping response vectors in Fig.  3 d; similar response trajectories in an unifying principal component space shown in Supplementary Fig.  4 ), but clearly distinguish the evaluation of the food+social mixture. Given additionally that electroantennography recordings do not reflect the same phenotypic difference observed in the AL (see Supplementary Fig.  3 ), we suggest that locust phase change is less likely to impact presynaptic receptor sensitivity, but that the observed crowding-dependent modulation is probably mediated by lateral network interactions. All other tested mixture combinations (lacking either the colony compound or appetitive food odor) were not different from the response to their components, reflecting a hypo-additive, or elemental, mixture response 41 , 42 , 43 . The comparison of PN response profiles to the food+social mixture revealed higher mixture synergy in gregarious locusts, which is reflected by both a larger proportion of mixture-specific PNs (Fig.  3 b) and synergistic response triplets (i.e., \(\left.[1\,| \,1\,| \,4]\right]\) and [1 ∣ 1 ∣ 6] in Fig. 5 f). The resulting odor profile—constructed from all PNs’ response statistics—reliably separates gregarious and solitarious phenotypes (LDA analysis, Fig.  5 h) and gives rise to specific differences in mixture processing. These predominantly rely on a higher proportion of PNs subjected to antagonistic mixture interactions in solitarious animals and synergistic in gregarious (Fig.  5 f). Mechanistically, given the lack of observed excitatory local interneurons (LNs, 44 ), these changes in network processing are likely mediated by disinhibition of lateral inhibitory LNs, innervated by L a a - or L c t -sensitive PNs. Local disinhibition will enable motif switches via the temporally and structurally diverse nature of LN populations 45 , 46 , 47 and thus give rise to differential response profiles with increasing population density.

State-dependent regulation of odor processing in the insect antennal lobe has been predominantly investigated in the context of hunger, which incites animals to approach odor cues they would typically avoid (reviewed in refs. 48 , 49 ). This reconfiguration involves both modulation of presynaptic receptor sensitivity 50 and recruitment of local interneuronal input by neuromodulatory pathways 46 , 51 . Another relevant type of context-dependent modulation in olfactory circuits is enhanced courtship receptivity in flies after detecting a food source nearby 52 , 53 . This enhancement is mediated by lateral excitatory input to the pheromone-sensitive glomerulus in the presence of vinegar smell 53 . In that context, differential lateral processing can be locally modulated by state-dependent (e.g., sex-specific, or virgin vs. mated) modifications to LN innervation patterns 53 . In locusts, similar network-spanning adjustments could occur with changes in population density to enhance food detection in swarms. This can be mediated via adaptive regulation of various components of the interweaved AL network—from local gain control by presynaptic interglomerular inhibition that attenuates ORN-PN signal transfer 47 , 54 , 55 to lateral interactions between LN pairs that sharpen odor discrimination and tune transient PN synchronization patterns 56 , 57 , 58 . Similarly, local inhibitory circuits within the mouse olfactory bulb—mediated by dendro-dendritic synaptic connections between mitral cells and granule cells 59 , 60 , analogous to antennal lobe PNs and LNs, respectively—facilitate the discrimination of closely related stimuli 61 . Taken together, nonlinear processing steps are essential for a context-dependent regulation of the olfactory system 62 . However, future research is needed to address how the locust AL network can be fine-tuned for swarming.

Our functional imaging approach complements previous work on locust olfaction characterizing odor mapping as a dynamic code of temporally evolving PN response trajectories that code odor identity 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 in a history-, and context-dependent manner 24 , 27 , 63 , 64 . Now, our study expands on this by mapping the spatial arrangement of odor responses across PNs in a single preparation. We demonstrate that individual odors activate broad, overlapping sets of multiglomerular PNs across the AL. Similar to other insects, these subsets are odor-specific and stable across repetitions (Fig.  4 a–c, in agreement with 25 ). Recent observations from clonal raider ants—another insect species with largely arborized ALs, similar to locusts—revealed a highly stereotyped odor encoding logic in the ORN population 65 . The many-to-many wiring map of single sensory neurons innervating multiple glomeruli in locusts predicts a broad combinatorial PN response (as seen here), even for narrowly tuned receptors 66 . The implications of such a wiring scheme on coding capacity, which is generally enhanced in the postsynaptic PN layer 67 , 68 , 69 , need further investigation.

Furthermore, we recorded from different cellular compartments—PN cell bodies (Fig.  2 ) and glomeruli (Fig.  4 d–h)—revealing synergistic interactions for both. Previous studies suggest that locust cell bodies match the overall PN activity profiles generated via local field potential recordings ( 22 . This is in line with PN cell bodies in Drosophila clearly exhibiting the odor tuning observed in the respective glomeruli 70 . Yet, our recordings also show differences between somatic and glomerular response properties that potentially reconcile disparities between the literature on locust olfaction and other insects. On the one hand, prolonged and temporally-varying somatic odor responses (Fig.  2 f and h) align with electrophysiological recordings from PN cell bodies in locusts 25 , 40 , 63 . On the other hand, fast rise and decay times in the glomerular calcium signals (Fig.  4 e and h) are consistent with more transient combinatorial maps described in other insects with functional imaging at the dendritic terminals (e.g., refs. 71 , 72 ). Taken together, these points advocate for stable glomerular odor separation across species and AL structures, which is reformatted via network processing into temporally dynamic odor maps for behaviorally relevant representations.

Swarms of desert locusts can span several hundred square kilometers and threaten the food security of millions. The density-dependent phase change from one phenotype to another is accompanied by substantial changes in the quantity, quality, and type of information animals can gather. Our results suggest that crowding already operates in early sensory processing centers, modulating—in our case—the antennal lobe output to influence animals’ foraging decisions. The higher proportion of mixture-specific PNs to both food+social but also food+food mixtures in gregarious animals (Fig.  3 b) may indicate a more general adaptation of gregarious locusts to handle multiple simultaneous odor signals in complex environments, such as swarms or varying ecological settings. Yet, to fully understand locust phase change and swarm formation, future research is needed to address the multimodal nature of this phenomenon. Our Bayesian decision-making model suggests that the integration of olfactory with visual information is essential for reliable decision-making, offering new research venues in the fields of vision and multimodal cue integration.

Furthermore, our robust and data-driven calcium imaging analysis provides a comprehensive way to measure odor representation across the locust AL. Given the natural gradient of sociality in locusts, this can be further extended to investigate the cellular mechanisms of adaptive social behavior in changing sensory environments. Altogether, considering their behavioral and social plasticity, locusts provide an excellent opportunity for investigating olfactory processing in complex environments and offer a trackable system for linking sensory adaptations to behaviorally relevant tasks.

All experiments were performed on gregarious and solitarious desert locusts S c h i s t o c e r c a g r e g a r i a (Forskål, 1775) obtained from our breeding colony at the animal facility of the University of Konstanz (Konstanz, Germany). Behavioral experiments were done with the last larval instar and functional imaging with freshly molted (<7 days old) adults. Gregarious locusts were reared in crowded cages (~200 animals per 50 × 50 × 80 cm cage), while solitarious locusts were raised in individual boxes (9 × 9 × 14 cm) with opaque walls in a well-ventilated room with constant air exchange (following 73 ). Except for animal density, all other conditions were kept similar for the two colonies with a 12:12 h light:dark cycle, temperature of 27–29 °C, relative humidity of 45% and a diet of in-house grown wheat seedlings, and freshly collected blackberry leaves ( R u b u s sect. R u b u s ). For all experiments, locusts of both sexes were used after one night of starvation. All experiments were carried out following the recommendations of the “3Rs” principles as stated in the Directive 2010/63/EU and all procedures were performed according to the guidelines of the German animal welfare law.

Behavioral choice assay

We initiated our study with an analysis of the interactions between social and food cues in a patch selection assay (modified from 74 ) which presented single locusts with four options: food (blackberry leaves, denoted as L v s ), a social setting (eight gregarious locusts, L c t ), a combination of leaves and locusts ( L v s L c t ), and an empty control patch ( C t r ). Locusts were tested in a 90 cm diameter arena with the four patch choices distributed equally (exchanging positions between trials) in the arena, with a distance of approximately 7 cm from the wall. The four patch choices were made from identical circular plastic containers (Fig.  1 a; width: 12 cm; height: 9 cm) and contained either 5 g of ripped blackberry leaves, eight locusts, eight locusts with 5 g of ripped blackberry leaves, or an empty control. In order to allow/prevent access to olfactory and/or visual cues, containers were either transparent with small holes, opaque with holes, or transparent but fully odor-sealed with Parafilm sealing film (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Each trial lasted 30 min and was recorded at 25 fps by a Basler camera (acA2040—90  μ m; Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany) with an IR longpass filter at the top of the arena. Uniform illumination was composed of a ceiling LED ring light (Hakutatz LED ring light, 33 cm, 35 W Bi-color 3200-5600 K) and a grid array of IR 850 nm with a diffuser plate below the arena. In order to prevent potential surrounding visual cues from the lab, uniform white walls of 1 m height were placed around the arena. Experiment containers and the arena were cleaned after each trial. The ambient temperature during experiments was kept between 24 and 26 °C.

Analysis of behavioral data

We obtained trajectories of individual locusts using a custom-written GUI 75 in MATLAB (R2023a, The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA, USA) for automated tracking with manual supervision. Obtained trajectories were temporally smoothed by convolution with a Gaussian kernel (half-width = 2 s, σ  = \(\frac{2}{3}\) s). Visit density at each patch option was estimated as previously described 10 by binning x / y -coordinates in a 1000 × 1000 pixel grid, followed by a frame-wise application of a 2-D Gaussian smoothing kernel (s.d. = 78, spatial filter domain, filter size = grid size minus one; matching the density-independent interaction range employed by locusts of ~7 cm 76 ). The resulting visit density maps were normalized by frame count, divided into four quarters, centered around each patch, and realigned so trials could be pooled across different patch configurations.

To dissect the processes underlying locust patch choice and to evaluate the contributions of the four information classes in the current assay (socio-visual, food-visual, socio-olfactory, and food-olfactory), we extended a Bayesian decision-making rule previously used in patch choice studies (Eqn. ( 1 ); refs. 10 , 29 ). Given the availability of each information class (e.g., w ( s o c i o − o l f a c t o r y )  = 1 for options containing locusts in the Olf(+) conditions, but 0 for the control option), we fitted the corresponding reliability parameter ( C i ) to the experimental visit density data in each patch quarter ( P x ).

We used Bayesian hyperparameter optimization (MATLAB built-in function bayesopt ) to fit the parameters in the range of 1 e −1 and 1 e 1 (log-transformed). We repeated the fitting process 5000 times, resulting in a predictive distribution based on which we estimated 95% credible intervals. Moreover, the nature of parameter C i allowed us to estimate an information reliability score ( l o g 10 ( C i )) that assesses the degree of attraction (values approaching 1) or aversion (values approaching -1) each information class had on the tested locusts.

Preparation of animals for functional fluorescence microscopy

We performed functional fluorescence microscopy in the antennal lobes (ALs) of young adult desert locusts by modifying protocols for backfilling AL projection neurons with dextran-coupled calcium indicators 77 , 78 . For dye application, we anesthetized animals with C O 2 to facilitate handling, removed wings and legs, and restrained the locusts in a custom-made holder using dental wax. On the first day, we opened a small window in the head capsule between the compound eyes, exposing the injection site. Next, using a glass capillary, we injected a crystal of a calcium indicator (Cal-520-Dextran Conjugate MW 10’000, AAT Bioquest ∣ Biomol GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) into the medial calixes of both mushroom bodies for a retrograde backfill of AL projection neurons. Following the injection, the brain was covered with locust saline 21 , and the head capsule was sealed with a drop of Eicosane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to prevent brain desiccation. We allowed the dye to travel overnight with the animal kept in a humid box at 15 °C. On the following day, we exposed the brain and especially both antennal lobes. However, as the antennal base is located directly above the antennal lobes and consequently occluding them, we carefully relocated each antenna ventrally toward the ipsilateral compound eye. Special care was taken to prevent damage to the antennal nerves. Following a successful relocation, we carefully removed the neural sheath covering the AL using fine forceps. For better optical accessibility, we gently elevated the brain with a stainless steel needle. As a last preparation step, we covered the preparation site with a transparent two-component silicon (Kwik-Sil, WPI, Sarasota, FL, USA).

Neuroanatomical staining

For morphological visualization of the olfactory pathway, we double-labeled PNs and ORNs using retrograde labeling. PN labeling followed a similar dye loading preparation as for the calcium imaging (see above) using the fluorescent tracer Alexa Fluor 568 conjugated with 10 kDa dextran. For receptor neuron tracing, the antennae were ablated close to the base, exposing the antennal nerve. The exposed antennal nerve was inserted into a glass capillary, loaded with 10 kDa dextran-conjugated Alexa Fluor 488 (both dyes by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Animals were incubated for 24 h at 15 °C, after which brains were quickly dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 3 h at 4 °C in the dark. Brains were further washed in PBS and dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol (50, 70, 90, 98, 100%), cleared in xylene for 10 min, and mounted in DPX mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). Successfully stained antennal lobes were scanned as z-stacks with a Zeiss laser scanning microscope 880 equipped with an Airyscan fast detector and a 25x water immersion objective (LD LCI Plan-Apochromat 25x/0,8 Imm Korr DIC, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) in the Bioimaging Centre at the University of Konstanz.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

Confocal microscopy of separate optical sections was acquired using an LSM 510 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), equipped with a 20 × water immersion objective (Zeiss W Plan-Apochromat 20 × /1,0 DIC VIS-IR, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The calcium-sensitive dye was excited with a 488 nm wavelength laser, and emitted light was filtered through a 500–550 nm band-pass filter. Optical sections were acquired at 1 Hz in two different depths (~ 35  μ m, and 140  μ m from the surface of the AL), with a resolution of 0.77  μ m/px ( x , y ), and a full-width half maximum of 25  μ m ( z ).

Odor preparation, olfactory stimulation, and chemical analysis

Odor stimulation was delivered via a custom-built olfactometer with a flow speed of 10 mL/s, and odors were injected for two seconds via a Teflon tube (inner diameter, 0.87 mm) to the ipsilateral antenna 79 . Stimuli were delivered by activating valves that redirected air towards a vial containing 200  μ L of diluted odor. In the case of a single odor, the flow via the odor headspace (200 mL/min) was compensated by closing a balancer that reduces the airflow by the same amount. For mixtures, the headspaces of the two odors (100 mL/min each) were passed through a common Teflon tube, allowing them to mix before arriving at the locust antenna. A 2-min inter-stimulus interval of clean air was used to flush any residues of odors and to let the PNs return to their resting state. The flow of the individual odors and the mixtures was monitored by a photoionization detector (Mini-PID model 200A, Aurora Scientific Inc, Ontario, Canada), which was placed at the opening of the odor delivery tube.

All synthetic compounds (purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) were diluted in mineral oil. Locusts were tested with the following odorants: cis-3-Hexenyl-acetate diluted to 10 −2 “ L a a ", 3-Hexen-1-ol diluted to 10 −2 “ Z 3 h l ", 3-Octanol diluted to 10 −2 “ O c t ", and 1-Hexanol diluted to 10 −3 “ H e x ". Odor dilutions were chosen after an initial screening for average PN response magnitude comparable to that of the blackberry leaves L v s in gregarious animals.

Lacking clear dominant candidates for emitted volatiles in the desert locusts (see latest summary of odor composition in ref. 80 ), we used an extraction from our locust colonies as the social “ L c t " odor. This was done by placing an evenly spread cotton wool layer in a gregarious colony cage with nymphs of the last larval instar and immature adults for two consecutive days. Odor vials were filled with either 0.5 g of colony cotton wool or 200 μL of odor dilution on 0.5 g of pure cotton wool. Mixtures were prepared by combining half the amount of the respective odor dilution, leaf extract, or colony cotton wool.

Volatile compounds for chemical analysis of the blackberry leaves were collected via 1 h leaf extract exposure of solid phase microextraction (100  μ m Polydimethylsiloxane Coating SPME Fiber Assembly, Supelco, Bellefonte, USA) and analyzed with a TRACE GC Ultra Multi-channel gas chromatograph, coupled to DSQ II single quadrupole MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The leaf extract was produced by grinding 1 g blackberry leaves in 200  μ L mineral oil.

Analysis of calcium imaging data

For our calcium imaging analysis, we obtained a three-dimensional stack ( x ,y, time) for each stimulus and processed the data in MATLAB (Fig.  2 d). First, we filtered raw images spatially to account for shot (photon) noise, using a combination of a median filter (3-by-3 pixels window) and a 2-D Gaussian filter (s.d. = 1). Potential bleaching was accounted for by subtracting a trendline (linear polynomial curve fit to each stimulus’ median pixel intensity time course). Next, we aligned frames belonging to one stimulus using a non-rigid motion correction algorithm (NoRMCorre 81 ) and a 2-D alignment based on phase differences 82 . Carefully aligning our data allowed us to apply a box-shaped kernel (3 frames) in the temporal domain before calculating relative fluorescence changes (Δ F / \({F}_{0}=\frac{F-{F}_{0}}{{F}_{0}}\) ) with the mean pre-stimulus activity five frames before stimulus onset as baseline activity F 0 . In the case of two repetitions, preprocessed stimulus sets were registered based on phase differences between the sets and eventually averaged.

Interested in an unbiased evaluation of AL responses and detailed quantification of complex response patterns, we referred from manually applying circular regions of interest. Instead, we opted for segmentation into individual, activity-dependent regions (granules) based on the Voronoi topology of the standard-deviation-projection (s.d.-projection) across the whole stimulus set. For this, we identified regional maxima and minima (pixel neighborhood was defined as pixels adjacent in the horizontal, vertical, or diagonal direction) in the s.d.-projection across all stimulus sets. Since the Voronoi diagram and Delaunay triangulation are geometric duals of each other, we could compute Voronoi granules from the Delaunay triangulation of the obtained regional extrema. This resulted in a rough 2-dimensional segmentation into regions that showed substantial changes in activity for any of the stimuli (regional maxima), separated by granules that lacked strong changes (regional minima).

Next, to obtain a more refined segmentation, we evaluated the activity of pixels along the Voronoi vertices. Specifically, we calculated the root median squared error between the activity of the pixel in question and the average activity of the neighboring Voronoi granule or the pixel’s ’home’ Voronoi granule, respectively. If the pixel had a smaller error with the neighboring Voronoi granule, we assigned it to this area in the next iteration. Alternatively, we kept the original assignment. This evaluation was applied to all pixels along borders between two granules and over a maximum of 50 iterations. Granules smaller than a minimum size of 5 px were fused with their neighboring granules. Last, we removed regions outside the AL and classified all valid ones as ’active’ or ’non-active’ given each stimulus. For this, we applied Otsu’s method to the respective mean intensity projection.

Construction of odor response vectors

To investigate network-spanning combinatorial coding patterns across all projection neuron cell bodies, we created a response magnitude matrix including data from all gregarious and solitarious animals. In this matrix, each row represents a single PN, and each column corresponds to the respective mean response magnitude during the window of analysis to each of the stimuli ( L a a , L c t , L a a L c t , Z 3 h l , Z 3 h l L c t , O c t , O c t L c t , Z 3 h l L a a , and O c t L a a ; Fig.  2 c). To account for inter-animal variability, we normalized the data belonging to a single animal. For this, we initially subtracted the minimum value in order to root-transform the data. Next, we centered the animal’s data to have a mean of zero and scaled them to have a standard deviation of one. As a last step, we rescaled the range of each PN’s vector (each row) to [-1, 1] before we projected the normalized response matrix into principal component (PC) space, retaining PCs that cumulatively explained at least 99% of the variance.

Following the preprocessing steps, we applied k -means clustering to construct distinct odor response vectors. The optimal number of clusters, k (1 <  k  ≤ 20), was ascertained by identifying the elbow point of the Variance Ratio Criterion (VRC, Eqn. ( 2 )) curve, which was exponentially decaying with an increasing number of clusters. The VRC is defined as

Here, S S B denotes the between-cluster variance, S S W denotes the within-cluster variance, and N denotes the number of observations corresponding to the rows in the response matrix. We defined the elbow point as the point on the VRC curve that was farthest from the line segment connecting the first V R C ( k  = 2) and last V R C ( k  = 20) points on the curve. We performed the k -means clustering based on squared Euclidean distances, with a maximum number of 10 6 iterations, 500 replicates, and with an online update phase in addition to the batch update phase, resulting in six odor response vectors.

Analysis of response consistency

Consistency in spatial odor representation was estimated with three general odorants: L a a , H e x , and O c t . Responses were captured in the focal depths of the PN cell bodies and glomeruli with repeated stimulus blocks (each stimulus presented once in semi-random order and repeated five times) to estimate the similarity between response maps. For this analysis, the rescaled (range set to [0, 1]) mean intensity maps from each animal were projected into the principal component (PC) space, treating each map as an observation and considering all pixels as features. We retained all PCs that cumulatively accounted for at least 95% of the variance. To evaluate the similarity between maps in PC space, we calculated the Euclidean distance between maps of the same odor stimulus and across maps from different stimuli. Using the average linkage method, we created a hierarchical cluster tree for each animal. Further, we estimated the overall within- and between-stimulus Euclidean distances to pool results across all animals.

Analysis of dynamical odor response motifs for locust phenotype prediction

To gain deeper insight into the dynamics of odor-induced PN responses and their variation across different stimuli, we identified distinct temporal response motifs. For this, we adopted an approach comparable to the one used to analyze odor response vectors (see above). We used the PN cell body confocal microscopy dataset, encompassing data from all gregarious and solitarious animals, to construct a response profile matrix (Fig.  5 a). Unlike the response vectors matrix, we treated all frames as features, each cell body appeared as three observations—one for each stimulus ( L a a , L c t , and L a a L c t )—and we z-scored each row. However, the principal component analysis-based preprocessing and k -means clustering remained consistent, identifying six odor response motifs based on the distinct patterns observed.

Next, we tracked how PN response motif assignments changed with odors. For this, we estimated the transition probabilities between response motifs (e.g., motif 2 → motif 4) from one stimulus to another (e.g., L c t  →  L a a ) for each individual animal. We used this information to fit a discriminant analysis classifier to differentiate between gregarious and solitarious animals based on the dynamics of motif transitions (same diagonal covariance matrix for both phenotypes). The classifier was trained using a leave-one-out approach, with each iteration including all but one animal for training (the model’s weights were adjusted to compensate for unequal sample sizes across classes) and employing the model to predict the phenotype of the excluded animal. This procedure was repeated for each animal in the dataset, providing a robust evaluation of the classification accuracy. Further, given the high feature dimensionality, we initially reduced the feature set (transition probabilities) using PCA, retaining all PCs that cumulatively accounted for at least 83% (based on screening different values) of the variance.

Analysis of synergistic stimulus interaction

To dissect odor response interactions, we analyzed motif triplets using the Bliss score (Eqn. ( 3 )), a standardized measure to categorize pairwise interactions 33 .

Here, f 1 and f 2 denote the individual response strengths (Δ F / F 0 as decimal rather than percentage) to L a a and L c t , respectively, while f 3 represents the observed response strength to the mixture ( L a a L c t ). Positive Bliss scores, which arise when the observed response strength ( L a a L c t response) exceeds the expected response strength, indicate synergistic interaction effects between L a a and L c t . Conversely, negative values represent antagonistic effects, and values approximating zero indicate additive effects. Note that we divided f 1 and f 2 by two in Eqn. ( 3 ) to account for using only half of each component ( L a a and L c t ) when creating the mixture.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis steps were conducted in MATLAB. Unless stated otherwise, we report averages as grand means, which represent the mean of animal means, together with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (with a bootstrap sample size of 5000) as shaded areas or error bars, respectively. Further, we used bootstrap randomization tests with B  = 10 7 samples (cf. 83 ) for statistical inference. We employed the following test statistic (Eqn. ( 4 )) for a paired, two-tailed comparison of observations z and y with the resulting pairwise difference x (mean \(\bar{x}\) , standard deviation σ x , sample size n )

For an unpaired, two-sample, two-tailed test, comparing observations z (mean \(\bar{z}\) , standard deviation σ z , sample size n ) and y (mean \(\bar{y}\) , standard deviation σ y , sample size m ), we used the following test statistic (Eqn. ( 5 ))

For both tests, we applied the same statistical summary to the permutated test statistic and to the test statistic of the original sample to determine the probability p of observing the permutated test statistic being the same or more extreme than the test statistic of the original sample. Note that this approach yields the lowest achievable p -value of 1/ B  = 1/10 −7 . In the case of a multiple comparison, the p -value was adjusted using the Bonferroni method.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the  Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Source data is provided as a source data file under accession code https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10931394 .  Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

All analysis code used for this paper is publicly available under accession code https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11190013 .

Simpson, S. J., McCaffery, A. R. & Hägele, B. F. A behavioural analysis of phase change in the desert locust. Biol. Rev. 74 , 461–480 (1999).

Article   Google Scholar  

Simpson, S., Sword, G., Whitman, D. W. & Ananthakrishnan, T. Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences 1st edn (Science Publishers, Inc., 2009).

Pener, M. P. & Simpson, S. J. Locust phase polyphenism: an update. Adv. Insect Physiol. 36 , 1–272 (2009).

Cullen, D. A. et al. From molecules to management: mechanisms and consequences of locust phase polyphenism. Adv. Insect Physiol. 53 , 167–285 (2017).

Collett, M., Despland, E., Simpson, S. J. & Krakauer, D. C. Spatial scales of desert locust gregarization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95 , 13052–13055 (1998).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Guttal, V., Romanczuk, P., Simpson, S. J., Sword, G. A. & Couzin, I. D. Cannibalism can drive the evolution of behavioural phase polyphenism in locusts. Ecol. Lett. 15 , 1158–1166 (2012).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Sword, G. A., Simpson, S. J., El Hadi, O. T. M. & Wilps, H. Density–dependent aposematism in the desert locust. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 267 , 63–68 (2000).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Wei, J. et al. Phenylacetonitrile in locusts facilitates an antipredator defense by acting as an olfactory aposematic signal and cyanide precursor. Sci. Adv. 5 , eaav5495 (2019).

Article   ADS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Chang, H. et al. A chemical defense deters cannibalism in migratory locusts. Science 380 , 537–543 (2023).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Günzel, Y., Oberhauser, F. B. & Couzin-Fuchs, E. Information integration for decision-making in desert locusts. iScience 26 , 106388 (2023).

Wilson, R. I. & Mainen, Z. F. Early events in olfactory processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29 , 163–201 (2006).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Galizia, C. G. Olfactory coding in the insect brain: data and conjectures. Eur. J. Neurosci. 39 , 1784–1795 (2014).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Stewart, W. B., Kauer, J. S. & Shepherd, G. M. Functional organization of rat olfactory bulb analysed by the 2-deoxyglucose method. J. Comp. Neurol. 185 , 715–734 (1979).

Korsching, S. I., Rummrich, A., Friedrich, R. W. & Weth, F. In Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. (eds Johnston, R. E., Müller-Schwarze, D. & Sorensen, P. W.) 525–533 (Springer, Boston, MA, 1999).

Hallem, E. A. & Carlson, J. R. The odor coding system of drosophila. Trends Genet. 20 , 453–459 (2004).

Ignell, R., Anton, S. & Hansson, B. S. The antennal lobe of orthoptera–anatomy and evolution. Brain Behav. Evol. 57 , 1–17 (2001).

Hansson, B., Ochieng’, S., Grosmaitre, X., Anton, S. & Njagi, P. Physiological responses and central nervous projections of antennal olfactory receptor neurons in the adult desert locust, schistocerca gregaria (orthoptera: Acrididae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 179 , 157–167 (1996).

Hansson, B. S. & Stensmyr, M. C. Evolution of insect olfaction. Neuron 72 , 698–711 (2011).

Anton, S. & Hansson, B. S. Antennal lobe interneurons in the desert locust schistocerca gregaria (forskal): processing of aggregation pheromones in adult males and females. J. Comp. Neurol. 370 , 85–96 (1996).

Ignell, R., Anton, S. & Hansson, B. Central nervous processing of behaviourally relevant odours in solitary and gregarious fifth instar locusts, schistocerca gregaria. J. Comp. Physiol. A 183 , 453–465 (1998).

Laurent, G. & Davidowitz, H. Encoding of olfactory information with oscillating neural assemblies. Science 265 , 1872–1875 (1994).

Laurent, G., Wehr, M. & Davidowitz, H. Temporal representations of odors in an olfactory network. J. Neurosci. 16 , 3837–3847 (1996).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Wehr, M. & Laurent, G. Odour encoding by temporal sequences of firing in oscillating neural assemblies. Nature 384 , 162–166 (1996).

Stopfer, M., Jayaraman, V. & Laurent, G. Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system. Neuron 39 , 991–1004 (2003).

Mazor, O. & Laurent, G. Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by locust antennal lobe projection neurons. Neuron 48 , 661–673 (2005).

Brown, S. L., Joseph, J. & Stopfer, M. Encoding a temporally structured stimulus with a temporally structured neural representation. Nat. Neurosci. 8 , 1568–1576 (2005).

Broome, B. M., Jayaraman, V. & Laurent, G. Encoding and decoding of overlapping odor sequences. Neuron 51 , 467–482 (2006).

Nizampatnam, S., Saha, D., Chandak, R. & Raman, B. Dynamic contrast enhancement and flexible odor codes. Nat. Commun. 9 , 3062 (2018).

Arganda, S., Pérez-Escudero, A. & de Polavieja, G. G. A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 , 20508–20513 (2012).

Lock, J. T., Parker, I. & Smith, I. F. A comparison of fluorescent ca2+ indicators for imaging local ca2+ signals in cultured cells. Cell Calcium 58 , 638–648 (2015).

Schneider, D. Elektrophysiologische untersuchungen von chemo-und mechanorezeptoren der antenne des seidenspinners bombyx mori l. Z. f.ür. Vgl. Physiol. 40 , 8–41 (1957).

Wang, P., Yin, X. & Zhang, L. Plant approach-avoidance response in locusts driven by plant volatile sensing at different ranges. J. Chem. Ecol. 45 , 410–419 (2019).

Bliss, C. I. The toxicity of poisons applied jointly 1. Ann. Appl. Biol. 26 , 585–615 (1939).

Dall, S. R., Giraldeau, L.-A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J. M. & Stephens, D. W. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 , 187–193 (2005).

Lihoreau, M. et al. Collective foraging in spatially complex nutritional environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 372 , 20160238 (2017).

Pérez-Escudero, A. & de Polavieja, G. Collective animal behavior from Bayesian estimation and probability matching. Nat. Preced. 7 , e1002282 (2011).

Wystrach, A., Mangan, M. & Webb, B. Optimal cue integration in ants. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282 , 20151484 (2015).

Meyniel, F., Sigman, M. & Mainen, Z. F. Confidence as bayesian probability: from neural origins to behavior. Neuron 88 , 78–92 (2015).

Ochieng, S. A., Hallberg, E. & Hansson, B. Fine structure and distribution of antennal sensilla of the desert locust, schistocerca gregaria (orthoptera: Acrididae). Cell tissue Res. 291 , 525–536 (1998).

Anton, S., Ignell, R. & Hansson, B. S. Developmental changes in the structure and function of the central olfactory system in gregarious and solitary desert locusts. Microsc. Res. Tech. 56 , 281–291 (2002).

Shen, K., Tootoonian, S. & Laurent, G. Encoding of mixtures in a simple olfactory system. Neuron 80 , 1246–1262 (2013).

Clifford, M. R. & Riffell, J. A. Mixture and odorant processing in the olfactory systems of insects: a comparative perspective. J. Comp. Physiol. A 199 , 911–928 (2013).

Mohamed, A. A. et al. Odor mixtures of opposing valence unveil inter-glomerular crosstalk in the drosophila antennal lobe. Nat. Commun. 10 , 1201 (2019).

Ernst, K. D., Boeckh, J. & Boeckh, V. A neuroanatomical study on the organization of the central antennal pathways in insects. Cell Tissue Res. 176 , 285–308 (1977).

Nagel, K. I. & Wilson, R. I. Mechanisms underlying population response dynamics in inhibitory interneurons of the drosophila antennal lobe. J. Neurosci. 36 , 4325–4338 (2016).

Vogt, K. et al. Internal state configures olfactory behavior and early sensory processing in drosophila larvae. Sci. Adv. 7 , eabd6900 (2021).

Barth-Maron, A., D’Alessandro, I. & Wilson, R. I. Interactions between specialized gain control mechanisms in olfactory processing. Curr. Biol. 33 , 5109–5120 (2023).

Sayin, S., Boehm, A. C., Kobler, J. M., De Backer, J.-F. & Grunwald Kadow, I. C. Internal state dependent odor processing and perception-the role of neuromodulation in the fly olfactory system. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12 , 11 (2018).

Lin, S., Senapati, B. & Tsao, C.-H. Neural basis of hunger-driven behaviour in drosophila. Open Biol. 9 , 180259 (2019).

Root, C. M., Ko, K. I., Jafari, A. & Wang, J. W. Presynaptic facilitation by neuropeptide signaling mediates odor-driven food search. Cell 145 , 133–144 (2011).

Albin, S. D. et al. A subset of serotonergic neurons evokes hunger in adult drosophila. Curr. Biol. 25 , 2435–2440 (2015).

Grosjean, Y. et al. An olfactory receptor for food-derived odours promotes male courtship in drosophila. Nature 478 , 236–240 (2011).

Das, S. et al. Electrical synapses mediate synergism between pheromone and food odors in drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114 , E9962–E9971 (2017).

Olsen, S. R. & Wilson, R. I. Lateral presynaptic inhibition mediates gain control in an olfactory circuit. Nature 452 , 956–960 (2008).

Warren, B. & Kloppenburg, P. Rapid and slow chemical synaptic interactions of cholinergic projection neurons and gabaergic local interneurons in the insect antennal lobe. J. Neurosci. 34 , 13039–13046 (2014).

MacLeod, K. & Laurent, G. Distinct mechanisms for synchronization and temporal patterning of odor-encoding neural assemblies. Science 274 , 976–979 (1996).

MacLeod, K., Bäcker, A. & Laurent, G. Who reads temporal information contained across synchronized and oscillatory spike trains? Nature 395 , 693–698 (1998).

Patel, M., Rangan, A. V. & Cai, D. A large-scale model of the locust antennal lobe. J. Comput. Neurosci. 27 , 553–567 (2009).

Article   MathSciNet   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Shepherd, G. M., & Greer, C. A. Olfactory bulb. In The synaptic organization of the brain . (ed. Shepherd, G. M.), 4th ed., 159–203 (Oxford University Press, 1998).

Abraham, N. M. et al. Synaptic inhibition in the olfactory bulb accelerates odor discrimination in mice. Neuron 65 , 399–411 (2010).

Schoppa, N. E. & Urban, N. N. Dendritic processing within olfactory bulb circuits. Trends Neurosci. 26 , 501–506 (2003).

Badel, L., Ohta, K., Tsuchimoto, Y. & Kazama, H. Decoding of context-dependent olfactory behavior in drosophila. Neuron 91 , 155–167 (2016).

Saha, D. et al. Behavioural correlates of combinatorial versus temporal features of odour codes. Nat. Commun. 6 , 6953 (2015).

Ling, D., Zhang, L., Saha, D., Chen, A. B. & Raman, B. Adaptation invariant concentration discrimination in an insect olfactory system. eLife 12 , RP89330 (2023).

Hart, T. et al. Sparse and stereotyped encoding implicates a core glomerulus for ant alarm behavior. Cell 186 , 3079–3094.e17 (2023).

Chang, H. et al. Odorant detection in a locust exhibits unusually low redundancy. Curr. Biol. 33 , 5427–5438 (2023).

Bhandawat, V., Olsen, S. R., Gouwens, N. W., Schlief, M. L. & Wilson, R. I. Sensory processing in the drosophila antennal lobe increases reliability and separability of ensemble odor representations. Nat. Neurosci. 10 , 1474–1482 (2007).

Raman, B., Joseph, J., Tang, J. & Stopfer, M. Temporally diverse firing patterns in olfactory receptor neurons underlie spatiotemporal neural codes for odors. J. Neurosci. 30 , 1994–2006 (2010).

Lüdke, A. et al. Calcium in kenyon cell somata as a substrate for an olfactory sensory memory in drosophila. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12 , 128 (2018).

Root, C. M., Semmelhack, J. L., Wong, A. M., Flores, J. & Wang, J. W. Propagation of olfactory information in drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 , 11826–11831 (2007).

Vosshall, L. B., Wong, A. M. & Axel, R. An olfactory sensory map in the fly brain. Cell 102 , 147–159 (2000).

Sachse, S. & Galizia, C. G. The coding of odour-intensity in the honeybee antennal lobe: local computation optimizes odour representation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 , 2119–2132 (2003).

Hoste, B. et al. An improved breeding method for solitarious locusts. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104 , 281–288 (2002).

Günzel, Y. et al. Social modulation of individual preferences in cockroaches. iScience 24 , 101964 (2021).

Article   ADS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Guenzel, Y. YannickGuenzel/BlobMaster3000: v1.0.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12394004 (Zenodo, 2024).

Buhl, J. et al. From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312 , 1402–1406 (2006).

Sachse, S. & Galizia, C. G. Role of inhibition for temporal and spatial odor representation in olfactory output neurons: a calcium imaging study. J. Neurophysiol. 87 , 1106–1117 (2002).

Paoli, M., Andrione, M. & Haase, A. In Imaging techniques in insects. Lateralized Brain Functions: Methods in Human and Non-human Species 471–519 (Springer, 2017).

Raiser, G., Galizia, C. G. & Szyszka, P. A high-bandwidth dual-channel olfactory stimulator for studying temporal sensitivity of olfactory processing. Chem. Senses 42 , 141–151 (2017).

Torto, B., Kirwa, H., Kihika, R. & Niassy, S. Odor composition of field versus laboratory desert locust populations. J. Insect Physiol. 134 , 104296 (2021).

Pnevmatikakis, E. A. & Giovannucci, A. Normcorre: An online algorithm for piecewise rigid motion correction of calcium imaging data. J. Neurosci. Methods 291 , 83–94 (2017).

Kughlin, C. & Hines, D. The phase correlation image alignment method. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Society 163–165 (IEEE, 1975).

MacKinnon, J. G. Bootstrap hypothesis testing. Handb. Comput. Econ. 183 , 213 (2009).

Google Scholar  

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Yvonne Hertenberger and Hannes Kübler for help with data collection; Nina Schwarz for providing locust illustrations; the team of the Bioimaging Centre at the University of Konstanz for help with obtaining confocal microscopy scans of antennal lobe double stainings; Marco Paoli for valuable insight on calcium imaging and corresponding analyses; Giovanni Galizia for providing feedback and facilities; Dieter Spiteller for GC advice and Hanna Schnell for odor preparation and support with the GC operation and analysis. James Foster, Ahmed El Hadi and Katrin Vogt for insightful comments on the manuscript. This work was completed with the support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy—EXC 2117—422037984 (supporting Y.G., S.S., S.K. and E.C.F.) and DFG project grant CO 1758/3-1 (E.C.F.).

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Inga Petelski, Yannick Günzel.

Authors and Affiliations

International Max Planck Research School for Quantitative Behavior, Ecology and Evolution from lab to field, 78464, Konstanz, Germany

Inga Petelski & Yannick Günzel

Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78464, Konstanz, Germany

Inga Petelski, Yannick Günzel, Sercan Sayin, Susanne Kraus & Einat Couzin-Fuchs

Department of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78464, Konstanz, Germany

Inga Petelski, Yannick Günzel & Einat Couzin-Fuchs

Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, 78464, Konstanz, Germany

Yannick Günzel, Sercan Sayin & Einat Couzin-Fuchs

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

I.P., S.S., and E.C.F. established the calcium imaging technique; Y.G. and E.C.F. conceptualized the project and wrote the first manuscript draft; I.P. and S.K. conducted behavior experiments, anatomy, chemical analysis, and functional imaging with S.S. and Y.G. providing conceptual and technical advice; Y.G. recorded EAG data, developed analysis models, analyzed data and created all figures. All authors contributed to writing the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yannick Günzel or Einat Couzin-Fuchs .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature Communications thanks Brian Smith and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information, peer review file, reporting summary, source data, source data, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Petelski, I., Günzel, Y., Sayin, S. et al. Synergistic olfactory processing for social plasticity in desert locusts. Nat Commun 15 , 5476 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49719-7

Download citation

Received : 09 January 2024

Accepted : 11 June 2024

Published : 28 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49719-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Find anything you save across the site in your account

Avril Lavigne Takes a Break From Touring for Couture Week

By Hannah Jackson

For Avril Lavigne , nothing is complicated about Paris. “My father was born here," she tells Vogue. "I used to live here and I took French classes, so I actually know the city very well. I feel very connected to Paris.”

Just days after she released her Greatest Hits record, Lavigne took to Paris for Iris van Herpen’s museum-like fall 2024 couture show . Straight from the Southside Festival in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, she hopped right into glam. “I got in and had a crêpe, French toast, and a cappuccino,” she says. While this may be her first couture show of the season, Lavigne is no stranger to fashion week. “My first time at Paris Fashion Week was a Chanel show and it was so wonderful. I hung out with Karl Lagerfeld and went to visit the Coco Chanel apartment,” she recalls. “I did my own hair and makeup that trip and kept it very minimal, and enjoyed wearing such iconic, beautiful garments.”

This time around, the Sk8r Boi singer is trading in her miniskirt and combat boots for a sculptural black-and-white piece by van Herpen. “I love to go extra for a fashion show and really experiment with new hairstyles and more experimental makeup looks. And I am willing to try anything wild and out there clothing wise! It’s all about having an open mind,” she says. As for what drew her to this specific dress? “It was a very different silhouette and fabric than I am used to which made it fun.”

Below, Avril Lavigne brought Vogue along as she attended the Iris van Herpen fall 2024 couture show in Paris.

Just rolled off the tour bus and went straight into glam! Still buzzing from the show the night before at Southside Festival

Glam before the event

Arriving at the Show no Idea what to expect. All we have been told is we will move through the show

Ran into my close friend Guram. We ended up walking through the show together and admiring the work.

Meeting Iris van Herpen

• Cast & crew

A father and his teen daughter attend a pop concert only to realize they've entered the center of a dark and sinister event. A father and his teen daughter attend a pop concert only to realize they've entered the center of a dark and sinister event. A father and his teen daughter attend a pop concert only to realize they've entered the center of a dark and sinister event.

• M. Night Shyamalan
• Josh Hartnett
• Hayley Mills
• Alison Pill

• Tour Manager

• Jody's Mom

• Police Officer

• Cooper's Mother

• (credit only)

• Kid Next To Riley

• Young Swat Member

• Main Street Pedestrian #1
• All cast & crew
• Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

New and Upcoming Horror

More like this

Did you know

• Trivia While being distributed by a major studio (Warner Bros), Trap was allowed to resume filming under an interim agreement during the SAG-AFTRA strike as M. Night Shyamalan independently finances his own films.

Cooper : Psst! Cooper.

Vendor : Jamie.

Cooper : What's with all the police trucks outside and the cameras everywhere, Jamie?

Vendor : I'm not supposed to tell.

Cooper : Something happening?

Vendor : Don't rat me out.

Cooper : I won't.

Vendor : You know the Butcher? That freakin' nutjob that goes around just chopping people up? Well, the feds or whatever heard that he's gonna be here today, so they set up a trap for him. This whole concert? It's a trap. They're watching all the exits, checking everyone that leaves. There's no way to get out of here. It's kinda dope, right?

• Connections Referenced in IMDb Explains: All About Horror in 2024 (2023)
• When will Trap be released? Powered by Alexa
• August 2, 2024 (United States)
• United Kingdom
• United States
• Good Grades
• Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (FirstOntario Center)
• Blinding Edge Pictures
• See more company credits at IMDbPro

Technical specs

Related news, contribute to this page.

• See more gaps
• Learn more about contributing

More to explore

Recently viewed.

• Statistics Stats
• You are here:

Solitary Experiments

• May 21, 2022 Setlist

Solitary Experiments Setlist at Stadthallengarten, Görlitz, Germany

• Edit setlist songs
• Edit venue & date
• Edit set times
• Add to festival
• Report setlist
• Every Time Play Video
• Epiphany Play Video
• Crash & Burn Play Video
• Immortal Play Video
• A Rush of Ecstasy Play Video
• Wonderland Play Video
• Delight Play Video
• Stars Play Video
• Odyssey of Mind Play Video
• Every Now and Then Play Video
• Trial and Error Play Video
• Pale Candle Light Play Video
• Point of View Play Video
• Brace Yourself! Play Video
• Game Over Play Video
• Rise and Fall Play Video
• Nobody's Diary ( Yazoo  cover) Play Video

Edits and Comments

3 activities (last edit by earfdae , 22 May 2022, 18:43 Etc/UTC )

Songs on Albums

• A Rush of Ecstasy
• Point of View
• Rise and Fall
• Trial and Error
• Brace Yourself!
• Crash & Burn
• Odyssey of Mind
• Pale Candle Light
• Every Now and Then
• Nobody's Diary by Yazoo

Complete Album stats

More from this Artist

• More Setlists
• Artist Statistics
• Add setlist

Stadthallengarten

• Solar Fake Add time Add time
• Solitary Experiments This Setlist Add time Add time
• Seadrake Add time Add time

Solitary Experiments Gig Timeline

• Nov 13 2021 E-tropolis Festival 2021 Oberhausen, Germany Add time Add time
• May 13 2022 Out of Line Weekender 2022 Berlin, Germany Add time Add time
• May 21 2022 Stadthallengarten This Setlist Görlitz, Germany Add time Add time
• Jul 29 2022 Festung Königstein Open-Air 2022 Königstein, Germany Add time Add time
• Aug 06 2022 M'era Luna Festival 2022 Hildesheim, Germany Add time Add time

4 people were there

• MarkoGlauko

Share or embed this setlist

Use this setlist for your event review and get all updates automatically!

<div style="text-align: center;" class="setlistImage"><a href="https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/solitary-experiments/2022/stadthallengarten-gorlitz-germany-13b7614d.html" title="Solitary Experiments Setlist Stadthallengarten, Görlitz, Germany 2022" target="_blank"><img src="https://www.setlist.fm/widgets/setlist-image-v1?id=13b7614d" alt="Solitary Experiments Setlist Stadthallengarten, Görlitz, Germany 2022" style="border: 0;" /></a> <div><a href="https://www.setlist.fm/edit?setlist=13b7614d&amp;step=song">Edit this setlist</a> | <a href="https://www.setlist.fm/setlists/solitary-experiments-bd6e55a.html">More Solitary Experiments setlists</a></div></div>

Last.fm Event Review

[url=https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/solitary-experiments/2022/stadthallengarten-gorlitz-germany-13b7614d.html][img]https://www.setlist.fm/widgets/setlist-image-v1?id=13b7614d[/img][/url] [url=https://www.setlist.fm/edit?setlist=13b7614d&amp;step=song]Edit this setlist[/url] | [url=https://www.setlist.fm/setlists/solitary-experiments-bd6e55a.html]More Solitary Experiments setlists[/url]

Tour Update

Marquee memories: pond.

• Jun 27, 2024
• Jun 26, 2024
• Jun 25, 2024
• Jun 24, 2024
• Jun 23, 2024
• Jun 22, 2024
• FAQ | Help | About
• Terms of Service
• Ad Choices | Privacy Policy
• Feature requests
• Songtexte.com